Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Alabama 6,10 44.1 (43.3, 44.9) 2,416 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.8, 2.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 40.6 (40.5, 40.7) 139,095 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.3)
Jefferson County 6,10 43.5 (41.4, 45.8) 320 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.8, 2.9)
Mobile County 6,10 49.2 (46.3, 52.2) 225 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.8, 4.5)
Madison County 6,10 38.7 (35.8, 41.7) 139 stable stable trend 3.4 (-6.3, 14.1)
Montgomery County 6,10 47.9 (44.0, 52.1) 113 stable stable trend -6.3 (-17.5, 6.4)
Baldwin County 6,10 41.5 (37.9, 45.4) 99 stable stable trend 2.6 (-6.0, 11.9)
Tuscaloosa County 6,10 42.0 (37.9, 46.5) 78 stable stable trend -8.3 (-22.8, 8.8)
Shelby County 6,10 37.8 (34.0, 42.0) 76 stable stable trend 4.2 (-5.7, 15.3)
Calhoun County 6,10 46.3 (41.3, 51.8) 64 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.2, -2.5)
Morgan County 6,10 44.8 (40.0, 50.2) 63 stable stable trend -1.6 (-19.0, 19.5)
Etowah County 6,10 44.2 (39.2, 49.6) 59 stable stable trend -1.9 (-10.9, 8.0)
Houston County 6,10 45.9 (40.5, 51.7) 55 stable stable trend -1.8 (-18.5, 18.3)
Talladega County 6,10 49.3 (43.2, 56.1) 48 stable stable trend -5.1 (-17.5, 9.1)
Lauderdale County 6,10 39.8 (34.8, 45.5) 46 stable stable trend -3.9 (-13.7, 6.9)
Marshall County 6,10 41.7 (36.3, 47.6) 45 stable stable trend -2.1 (-21.1, 21.5)
Lee County 6,10 34.9 (30.2, 40.1) 42 stable stable trend 0.4 (-15.4, 19.0)
Cullman County 6,10 40.8 (35.3, 47.0) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-8.3, 7.4)
St. Clair County 6,10 39.8 (34.2, 46.1) 38 stable stable trend -3.0 (-14.7, 10.3)
Elmore County 6,10 45.3 (38.9, 52.4) 37 stable stable trend -9.7 (-21.3, 3.6)
Limestone County 6,10 37.6 (32.2, 43.7) 36 stable stable trend -3.3 (-11.6, 5.7)
Walker County 6,10 42.4 (36.3, 49.3) 36 stable stable trend 0.6 (-19.3, 25.5)
Colbert County 6,10 46.4 (39.6, 54.1) 34 stable stable trend 9.1 (-6.0, 26.5)
Dallas County 6,10 62.4 (52.8, 73.3) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-14.5, 15.6)
Jackson County 6,10 45.4 (38.4, 53.5) 31 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.2, 5.3)
DeKalb County 6,10 36.7 (31.0, 43.2) 30 stable stable trend -1.6 (-23.8, 27.2)
Russell County 6,10 51.3 (43.1, 60.5) 29 stable stable trend -5.0 (-28.6, 26.4)
Blount County 6,10 41.1 (34.4, 48.7) 28 stable stable trend -4.7 (-22.8, 17.7)
Covington County 6,10 51.1 (42.6, 60.8) 27 rising rising trend 13.1 (3.3, 23.9)
Autauga County 6,10 46.2 (38.5, 55.0) 26 stable stable trend -4.2 (-13.2, 5.7)
Chambers County 6,10 49.7 (40.7, 60.1) 23 stable stable trend 16.5 (-8.1, 47.7)
Tallapoosa County 6,10 40.2 (32.8, 48.8) 22 stable stable trend -9.5 (-31.8, 20.2)
Clarke County 6,10 67.1 (54.8, 81.5) 21 stable stable trend 1.9 (-19.0, 28.2)
Dale County 6,10 35.4 (28.7, 43.3) 20 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.9, 8.5)
Escambia County 6,10 43.2 (35.0, 52.8) 20 stable stable trend 8.4 (-22.7, 51.9)
Lawrence County 6,10 48.0 (38.7, 59.1) 19 stable stable trend 3.4 (-35.5, 65.6)
Marion County 6,10 46.8 (37.5, 57.9) 19 stable stable trend 9.7 (-0.8, 21.4)
Monroe County 6,10 62.6 (50.1, 77.5) 18 stable stable trend 9.6 (-1.3, 21.8)
Coffee County 6,10 30.3 (24.2, 37.4) 18 stable stable trend 4.6 (-15.3, 29.3)
Franklin County 6,10 45.3 (36.0, 56.4) 17 stable stable trend -2.0 (-9.4, 6.0)
Winston County 6,10 50.1 (39.6, 62.8) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-18.3, 18.0)
Barbour County 6,10 49.6 (39.1, 62.1) 16 stable stable trend -4.1 (-35.7, 43.0)
Chilton County 6,10 29.5 (23.1, 37.2) 15 stable stable trend 6.3 (-23.0, 46.7)
Geneva County 6,10 40.3 (31.4, 51.2) 14 stable stable trend -2.0 (-14.4, 12.1)
Cherokee County 6,10 35.9 (27.7, 46.2) 14 stable stable trend 6.2 (-17.5, 36.7)
Fayette County 6,10 58.9 (45.5, 75.5) 14 stable stable trend -2.9 (-32.8, 40.4)
Randolph County 6,10 45.0 (34.7, 57.7) 14 stable stable trend -7.3 (-24.8, 14.2)
Marengo County 6,10 49.8 (38.4, 63.8) 13 stable stable trend 13.0 (-7.6, 38.3)
Butler County 6,10 47.8 (36.8, 61.4) 13 stable stable trend 5.9 (-20.4, 40.8)
Macon County 6,10 54.4 (41.7, 70.1) 13 stable stable trend 19.5 (-17.0, 72.1)
Pike County 6,10 36.0 (27.3, 46.7) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-32.4, 43.5)
Lamar County 6,10 57.4 (43.4, 74.9) 12 rising rising trend 14.7 (5.2, 25.0)
Washington County 6,10 54.1 (40.6, 70.9) 11 stable stable trend 2.4 (-5.1, 10.4)
Bibb County 6,10 44.5 (33.4, 58.3) 11 stable stable trend -13.5 (-38.0, 20.7)
Pickens County 6,10 39.0 (29.0, 51.6) 10 stable stable trend -10.2 (-33.3, 21.0)
Choctaw County 6,10 51.8 (37.9, 69.7) 10 stable stable trend 22.8 (-35.6, 134.1)
Crenshaw County 6,10 53.8 (39.6, 71.9) 10 stable stable trend 12.4 (-10.7, 41.4)
Wilcox County 6,10 70.9 (51.9, 94.8) 10 stable stable trend 6.2 (-23.4, 47.1)
Cleburne County 6,10 49.6 (36.3, 66.5) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-27.6, 43.2)
Conecuh County 6,10 52.2 (37.8, 70.9) 9 falling falling trend -20.3 (-33.5, -4.4)
Henry County 6,10 39.2 (28.1, 53.5) 9 stable stable trend -14.3 (-50.9, 49.5)
Lowndes County 6,10 64.8 (46.5, 88.4) 9 stable stable trend -20.9 (-41.8, 7.5)
Hale County 6,10 44.8 (32.0, 61.3) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-13.2, 13.7)
Clay County 6,10 44.0 (31.1, 60.7) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-34.6, 53.1)
Bullock County 6,10 60.7 (42.8, 84.0) 8 stable stable trend -11.0 (-57.4, 85.8)
Sumter County 6,10 41.7 (28.8, 58.9) 7 stable stable trend -7.4 (-46.8, 60.9)
Greene County 6,10 52.2 (35.2, 75.3) 6 stable stable trend -5.3 (-25.8, 20.9)
Perry County 6,10 47.9 (31.9, 69.4) 6 stable stable trend -6.2 (-46.5, 64.4)
Coosa County 6,10 31.8 (20.4, 48.1) 5 stable stable trend -4.4 (-25.5, 22.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/25/2016 6:04 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top