Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Colon & Rectum, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6,10 No 43.7 (42.9, 44.5) 2,430 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 39.8 (39.7, 39.9) 139,083 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Coffee County 6,10 Yes 29.8 (23.8, 36.8) 18 stable stable trend -9.5 (-24.2, 8.0)
Chilton County 6,10 Yes 31.1 (24.5, 38.9) 16 stable stable trend 10.0 (-17.1, 46.1)
Coosa County 6,10 Yes 33.9 (21.7, 51.1) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-23.7, 26.5)
Geneva County 6,10 Yes 34.6 (26.5, 44.8) 13 stable stable trend -6.4 (-31.9, 28.6)
Lee County 6,10 Yes 34.9 (30.3, 40.0) 43 stable stable trend 1.4 (-14.3, 19.9)
Cherokee County 6,10 Yes 35.8 (27.7, 46.0) 14 stable stable trend 4.1 (-26.4, 47.3)
Madison County 6,10 Yes 37.7 (34.9, 40.7) 140 stable stable trend 2.9 (-9.2, 16.6)
Cullman County 6,10 Yes 38.0 (32.7, 43.9) 39 stable stable trend -5.7 (-19.4, 10.3)
Pickens County 6,10 Yes 38.0 (28.3, 50.5) 10 stable stable trend 13.1 (-10.4, 42.7)
Blount County 6,10 Yes 38.9 (32.5, 46.2) 27 stable stable trend -7.4 (-25.0, 14.4)
Tallapoosa County 6,10 Yes 38.9 (31.6, 47.5) 21 stable stable trend 7.8 (-18.2, 42.0)
Shelby County 6,10 Yes 38.9 (35.1, 43.1) 80 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.1, 4.7)
Tuscaloosa County 6,10 Yes 39.0 (35.0, 43.3) 74 stable stable trend 0.6 (-5.5, 7.1)
DeKalb County 6,10 Yes 39.4 (33.5, 46.1) 33 stable stable trend 1.7 (-19.1, 27.7)
Hale County 6,10 Yes 39.5 (27.8, 54.9) 8 stable stable trend -3.7 (-19.3, 14.9)
Limestone County 6,10 Yes 39.8 (34.3, 46.0) 39 stable stable trend 3.9 (-13.2, 24.3)
Pike County 6,10 No 40.2 (31.0, 51.4) 14 stable stable trend 3.2 (-27.1, 46.2)
Dale County 6,10 No 40.5 (33.3, 48.8) 23 stable stable trend 11.0 (-4.7, 29.4)
Jackson County 6,10 No 41.5 (34.7, 49.2) 28 stable stable trend -8.8 (-31.1, 20.6)
Jefferson County 6,10 No 41.6 (39.5, 43.8) 308 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.0, 2.7)
Morgan County 6,10 No 41.7 (37.1, 46.9) 59 stable stable trend -1.2 (-19.0, 20.5)
Baldwin County 6,10 No 41.8 (38.2, 45.7) 103 stable stable trend -3.4 (-6.6, 0.0)
St. Clair County 6,10 No 42.0 (36.2, 48.4) 41 stable stable trend -2.8 (-15.7, 12.1)
Franklin County 6,10 No 42.1 (33.2, 52.7) 16 stable stable trend -3.3 (-11.6, 5.7)
Henry County 6,10 No 42.1 (30.6, 56.9) 9 stable stable trend -12.9 (-39.3, 24.8)
Perry County 6,10 No 42.6 (27.8, 63.0) 5 stable stable trend -8.2 (-50.8, 71.3)
Conecuh County 6,10 No 42.9 (29.9, 60.0) 8 stable stable trend -8.3 (-33.6, 26.5)
Elmore County 6,10 No 43.0 (36.8, 49.9) 36 stable stable trend -9.0 (-19.6, 3.0)
Lauderdale County 6,10 No 43.4 (38.1, 49.2) 51 stable stable trend 5.0 (-14.3, 28.5)
Marshall County 6,10 No 43.4 (38.0, 49.5) 48 stable stable trend 2.6 (-19.1, 30.2)
Montgomery County 6,10 No 44.3 (40.5, 48.3) 105 stable stable trend -1.5 (-8.3, 5.8)
Sumter County 6,10 No 44.7 (30.5, 63.6) 7 stable stable trend 30.1 (-23.3, 120.7)
Escambia County 6,10 No 45.1 (36.8, 54.8) 21 stable stable trend -3.2 (-29.0, 32.2)
Calhoun County 6,10 No 45.1 (40.2, 50.5) 63 stable stable trend -0.6 (-9.1, 8.8)
Butler County 6,10 No 45.2 (34.5, 58.6) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-29.3, 42.5)
Etowah County 6,10 No 45.3 (40.2, 50.8) 61 stable stable trend 4.1 (-8.0, 17.8)
Randolph County 6,10 No 45.4 (35.0, 58.2) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-22.1, 25.2)
Houston County 6,10 No 45.5 (40.2, 51.3) 56 stable stable trend 0.1 (-15.6, 18.8)
Clay County 6,10 No 46.1 (32.7, 63.6) 8 stable stable trend 24.8 (-11.0, 75.1)
Walker County 6,10 No 46.6 (40.2, 53.9) 40 stable stable trend 2.1 (-18.0, 27.0)
Colbert County 6,10 No 46.8 (39.9, 54.6) 34 stable stable trend 8.6 (-11.9, 34.0)
Winston County 6,10 No 47.3 (37.0, 59.9) 15 stable stable trend -2.4 (-19.3, 17.9)
Autauga County 6,10 No 47.4 (39.6, 56.4) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-7.9, 7.8)
Mobile County 6,10 No 48.8 (45.9, 51.7) 227 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.1, 6.6)
Barbour County 6,10 No 48.8 (38.6, 61.1) 16 stable stable trend -11.3 (-35.1, 21.3)
Bibb County 6,10 No 48.9 (37.3, 63.0) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-32.6, 43.1)
Marion County 6,10 No 49.0 (39.6, 60.3) 20 stable stable trend 4.4 (-10.0, 21.2)
Crenshaw County 6,10 No 49.1 (35.4, 66.7) 9 stable stable trend 10.4 (-28.3, 69.8)
Talladega County 6,10 No 49.9 (43.7, 56.7) 49 stable stable trend 7.6 (-1.8, 17.9)
Greene County 6,10 No 50.0 (33.5, 72.7) 6 stable stable trend 6.2 (-11.4, 27.3)
Russell County 6,10 No 50.5 (42.5, 59.5) 29 rising rising trend 13.7 (7.6, 20.3)
Macon County 6,10 No 50.9 (38.5, 66.2) 12 stable stable trend 14.7 (-41.9, 126.4)
Fayette County 6,10 No 51.7 (39.0, 67.5) 12 stable stable trend -15.0 (-40.3, 21.2)
Cleburne County 6,10 No 53.5 (39.9, 70.6) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-21.1, 27.7)
Marengo County 6,10 No 54.2 (42.1, 68.9) 14 stable stable trend 2.7 (-18.9, 30.1)
Bullock County 6,10 No 55.5 (38.8, 77.5) 7 stable stable trend -26.2 (-59.1, 33.3)
Covington County 6,10 No 56.0 (47.1, 66.2) 30 stable stable trend 7.6 (-6.9, 24.4)
Washington County 6,10 No 56.1 (42.4, 73.2) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 4.0)
Chambers County 6,10 No 57.1 (47.5, 68.3) 26 stable stable trend 6.1 (-10.1, 25.2)
Lawrence County 6,10 No 57.6 (47.5, 69.4) 24 stable stable trend 6.1 (-26.0, 52.0)
Dallas County 6,10 No 57.7 (48.6, 68.1) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-16.9, 17.9)
Lamar County 6,10 No 58.1 (44.2, 75.7) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-17.4, 20.2)
Lowndes County 6,10 No 58.2 (40.8, 80.7) 8 stable stable trend 4.5 (-26.2, 48.1)
Choctaw County 6,10 No 62.5 (47.2, 81.8) 12 stable stable trend 12.3 (-32.6, 87.0)
Monroe County 6,10 No 62.6 (50.0, 77.6) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-20.7, 24.1)
Clarke County 6,10 No 63.4 (51.4, 77.5) 20 stable stable trend -6.1 (-25.3, 18.0)
Wilcox County 6,10 No 72.0 (52.3, 96.9) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-26.3, 41.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2017 4:48 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top