Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Alabama 6,10 37.3 (36.3, 38.3) 1,127 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.9, 4.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 35.5 (35.4, 35.7) 66,990 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
Wilcox County 6,10 69.7 (46.3, 102.0) 6 stable stable trend 14.8 (-33.0, 96.7)
Monroe County 6,10 56.7 (41.2, 76.7) 9 rising rising trend 23.5 (2.2, 49.2)
Dallas County 6,10 55.3 (43.5, 69.3) 16 stable stable trend -5.7 (-25.8, 20.0)
Clarke County 6,10 52.2 (37.8, 70.7) 9 stable stable trend 8.2 (-34.9, 79.7)
Russell County 6,10 51.4 (40.8, 64.1) 16 stable stable trend -9.3 (-33.1, 23.0)
Conecuh County 6,10 49.5 (30.6, 76.8) 5 stable stable trend -21.8 (-50.3, 23.2)
Washington County 6,10 49.1 (31.7, 73.0) 5 stable stable trend -22.0 (-42.1, 5.1)
Lamar County 6,10 49.0 (31.9, 73.3) 5 stable stable trend 4.4 (-19.9, 36.2)
Bullock County 6,10 47.1 (25.8, 80.1) 3
*
*
Lowndes County 6,10 46.6 (27.5, 75.2) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-43.7, 73.0)
Jackson County 6,10 46.4 (36.7, 58.0) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-13.4, 12.4)
Barbour County 6,10 45.6 (32.1, 63.3) 8 stable stable trend -9.3 (-43.5, 45.5)
Chambers County 6,10 45.5 (34.4, 59.4) 12 stable stable trend 7.9 (-26.3, 58.1)
Macon County 6,10 44.6 (30.3, 64.1) 6 stable stable trend 23.9 (-24.8, 104.1)
Autauga County 6,10 44.2 (34.2, 56.2) 14 stable stable trend -8.5 (-21.8, 7.1)
Marion County 6,10 43.0 (30.5, 59.3) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-17.7, 28.3)
Franklin County 6,10 43.0 (30.9, 58.4) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-27.5, 35.8)
Winston County 6,10 42.4 (29.8, 59.2) 8 stable stable trend 10.6 (-28.4, 70.9)
Montgomery County 6,10 42.0 (37.2, 47.2) 57 stable stable trend -7.6 (-22.8, 10.5)
Colbert County 6,10 40.5 (32.1, 50.7) 17 stable stable trend 14.2 (-6.6, 39.6)
Mobile County 6,10 40.5 (37.0, 44.2) 104 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.5, 1.6)
Walker County 6,10 40.4 (32.5, 49.9) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-32.6, 45.2)
Choctaw County 6,10 39.8 (23.7, 63.8) 4 stable stable trend 14.6 (-49.7, 161.3)
Crenshaw County 6,10 39.7 (23.9, 63.2) 4 stable stable trend 38.0 (-4.7, 99.8)
Fayette County 6,10 39.5 (25.7, 59.4) 5 stable stable trend 8.5 (-33.4, 76.6)
Talladega County 6,10 39.3 (31.9, 47.9) 21 stable stable trend -5.6 (-27.1, 22.4)
Bibb County 6,10 39.0 (25.3, 58.0) 5 stable stable trend -28.0 (-61.3, 34.1)
Elmore County 6,10 39.0 (31.0, 48.4) 17 stable stable trend -10.4 (-36.6, 26.6)
Geneva County 6,10 38.9 (27.1, 54.6) 7 stable stable trend 6.3 (-16.5, 35.3)
Houston County 6,10 37.9 (31.5, 45.4) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-14.3, 16.6)
Calhoun County 6,10 37.1 (31.2, 43.9) 29 stable stable trend -11.7 (-29.7, 10.7)
Jefferson County 6,10 36.9 (34.3, 39.7) 155 stable stable trend -1.7 (-13.2, 11.2)
Hale County 6,10 36.7 (21.8, 58.6) 4
*
*
Blount County 6,10 36.7 (28.3, 46.9) 14 stable stable trend -10.7 (-35.4, 23.5)
Covington County 6,10 36.7 (27.5, 48.4) 11 stable stable trend 5.7 (-11.6, 26.4)
Tuscaloosa County 6,10 36.5 (31.4, 42.3) 37 stable stable trend -12.0 (-28.7, 8.7)
Marshall County 6,10 36.0 (29.4, 43.7) 22 stable stable trend 18.1 (-7.9, 51.4)
Lawrence County 6,10 35.9 (25.4, 49.4) 8 stable stable trend -6.6 (-46.1, 61.6)
Cullman County 6,10 35.8 (28.9, 43.9) 19 stable stable trend 5.1 (-9.5, 21.9)
Tallapoosa County 6,10 35.6 (26.4, 47.4) 10 stable stable trend -6.6 (-40.0, 45.4)
Escambia County 6,10 35.5 (25.6, 48.4) 9 stable stable trend -9.1 (-31.2, 20.2)
Etowah County 6,10 35.1 (29.3, 41.9) 27 stable stable trend -3.8 (-20.1, 16.0)
Morgan County 6,10 34.9 (29.1, 41.5) 26 stable stable trend -5.4 (-16.9, 7.7)
DeKalb County 6,10 34.6 (27.1, 43.6) 15 stable stable trend 1.5 (-29.2, 45.6)
Marengo County 6,10 34.6 (22.6, 51.4) 5 stable stable trend 10.8 (-47.0, 131.6)
Baldwin County 6,10 34.3 (29.8, 39.3) 44 stable stable trend 2.4 (-17.2, 26.7)
Sumter County 6,10 33.7 (19.3, 56.0) 4 stable stable trend -20.8 (-59.0, 52.9)
Shelby County 6,10 33.6 (28.7, 39.1) 35 stable stable trend 4.7 (-20.5, 37.9)
Clay County 6,10 33.2 (18.9, 55.4) 3
*
*
St. Clair County 6,10 33.0 (26.2, 41.0) 17 stable stable trend 6.8 (-12.0, 29.8)
Lauderdale County 6,10 32.9 (26.9, 40.0) 22 stable stable trend -3.3 (-12.9, 7.4)
Limestone County 6,10 32.6 (25.9, 40.6) 17 stable stable trend -5.0 (-25.1, 20.3)
Pike County 6,10 32.1 (21.2, 46.6) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-49.7, 92.9)
Madison County 6,10 31.8 (28.4, 35.6) 63 stable stable trend 7.6 (-3.0, 19.4)
Lee County 6,10 31.6 (25.7, 38.4) 20 stable stable trend 1.2 (-17.4, 24.0)
Butler County 6,10 31.6 (19.9, 48.2) 5 stable stable trend 5.3 (-20.9, 40.3)
Dale County 6,10 31.5 (23.0, 42.2) 9 stable stable trend 17.5 (-10.9, 54.8)
Pickens County 6,10 29.1 (18.2, 45.1) 4 falling falling trend -35.2 (-50.2, -15.7)
Henry County 6,10 28.0 (15.7, 46.8) 3
*
*
Chilton County 6,10 25.5 (17.7, 35.9) 7 stable stable trend 5.5 (-33.9, 68.5)
Coffee County 6,10 25.2 (17.9, 34.7) 8 stable stable trend 5.6 (-34.3, 69.6)
Randolph County 6,10 22.7 (13.4, 36.7) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-48.7, 100.1)
Cherokee County 6,10 22.1 (13.5, 35.0) 4 stable stable trend 14.7 (-29.0, 85.2)
Cleburne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/27/2016 12:43 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top