Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Colon & Rectum, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6,10 Yes 36.9 (36.0, 37.9) 1,130 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.3, 5.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 34.8 (34.7, 34.9) 66,668 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Wilcox County 6,10 No 61.1 (38.5, 93.1) 5 stable stable trend 10.5 (-47.1, 130.7)
Monroe County 6,10 No 61.0 (44.8, 81.8) 10 stable stable trend 3.0 (-23.4, 38.5)
Chambers County 6,10 No 53.6 (41.4, 68.6) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-14.1, 15.5)
Clarke County 6,10 No 50.9 (36.4, 69.7) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-37.4, 67.5)
Dallas County 6,10 No 49.0 (38.2, 62.2) 14 stable stable trend -3.5 (-24.9, 24.0)
Lamar County 6,10 No 47.5 (30.9, 71.2) 5 stable stable trend -3.0 (-26.7, 28.5)
Marion County 6,10 No 45.3 (32.4, 61.9) 9 stable stable trend 3.5 (-17.7, 30.2)
Russell County 6,10 No 44.5 (34.7, 56.2) 15 stable stable trend -0.0 (-19.2, 23.7)
Walker County 6,10 No 44.5 (36.1, 54.4) 21 stable stable trend -6.6 (-27.3, 19.9)
Choctaw County 6,10 No 43.6 (27.0, 68.2) 5 stable stable trend 10.7 (-48.3, 137.3)
Lowndes County 6,10 No 43.6 (25.3, 71.5) 3
*
*
Barbour County 6,10 No 43.4 (30.7, 60.3) 8 falling falling trend -23.5 (-39.8, -2.9)
Lawrence County 6,10 No 43.1 (31.6, 57.8) 10 stable stable trend 25.2 (-26.6, 113.5)
Jackson County 6,10 No 42.5 (33.3, 53.7) 15 stable stable trend -12.6 (-33.4, 14.7)
Washington County 6,10 No 41.4 (25.6, 64.1) 4 falling falling trend -25.8 (-43.1, -3.4)
Winston County 6,10 No 41.3 (28.6, 58.4) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-35.9, 55.3)
Autauga County 6,10 No 40.9 (31.3, 52.5) 13 stable stable trend -2.4 (-14.7, 11.6)
Macon County 6,10 No 40.8 (27.1, 59.8) 6 stable stable trend 32.5 (-47.6, 234.8)
Mobile County 6,10 No 40.7 (37.2, 44.4) 105 stable stable trend 0.6 (-6.5, 8.3)
Colbert County 6,10 No 40.4 (31.8, 50.8) 16 stable stable trend 13.5 (-15.2, 51.9)
Covington County 6,10 No 40.3 (30.5, 52.6) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-15.7, 16.2)
Marshall County 6,10 Yes 39.4 (32.5, 47.3) 24 stable stable trend 13.2 (-15.2, 51.2)
Hale County 6,10 Yes 39.2 (23.8, 61.4) 4
*
*
Bibb County 6,10 Yes 39.1 (25.6, 57.7) 5 stable stable trend -10.5 (-49.8, 59.7)
Franklin County 6,10 Yes 38.6 (27.3, 53.3) 8 stable stable trend -9.2 (-38.1, 33.2)
Sumter County 6,10 Yes 38.6 (21.4, 64.6) 4 stable stable trend 40.1 (-33.4, 194.7)
Houston County 6,10 Yes 38.3 (31.9, 45.7) 26 stable stable trend -3.0 (-14.3, 9.8)
Marengo County 6,10 Yes 38.2 (25.2, 56.1) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-51.0, 110.3)
Talladega County 6,10 Yes 37.9 (30.8, 46.3) 20 stable stable trend 5.0 (-14.4, 28.7)
DeKalb County 6,10 Yes 37.8 (30.1, 46.9) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-24.8, 35.2)
Tallapoosa County 6,10 Yes 37.7 (27.9, 50.0) 11 stable stable trend 6.8 (-33.1, 70.7)
Montgomery County 6,10 Yes 37.6 (33.1, 42.6) 51 stable stable trend 0.1 (-7.0, 7.7)
Clay County 6,10 Yes 37.4 (21.6, 61.5) 4 stable stable trend 36.4 (-1.1, 88.2)
Escambia County 6,10 Yes 37.4 (27.2, 50.4) 9 stable stable trend -9.0 (-27.2, 13.7)
Dale County 6,10 Yes 37.3 (28.0, 48.8) 11 rising rising trend 30.7 (12.3, 52.2)
Etowah County 6,10 Yes 36.6 (30.7, 43.5) 28 stable stable trend 4.0 (-16.1, 28.9)
Geneva County 6,10 Yes 36.4 (25.3, 51.4) 7 stable stable trend 8.5 (-31.3, 71.3)
Conecuh County 6,10 Yes 36.4 (21.1, 60.0) 4 stable stable trend 5.1 (-18.6, 35.6)
Cullman County 6,10 Yes 36.3 (29.3, 44.6) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-14.9, 15.8)
Lauderdale County 6,10 Yes 36.2 (29.9, 43.6) 24 stable stable trend 7.0 (-12.7, 31.2)
Baldwin County 6,10 Yes 36.1 (31.6, 41.2) 47 stable stable trend -3.2 (-11.8, 6.1)
Shelby County 6,10 Yes 36.0 (31.1, 41.6) 39 stable stable trend -2.6 (-17.6, 15.2)
Henry County 6,10 Yes 35.6 (21.9, 55.7) 5 stable stable trend -12.4 (-36.1, 20.2)
St. Clair County 6,10 Yes 35.6 (28.6, 44.0) 18 stable stable trend 8.2 (-14.7, 37.2)
Elmore County 6,10 Yes 35.3 (27.8, 44.2) 16 stable stable trend -14.1 (-37.3, 17.8)
Jefferson County 6,10 Yes 34.8 (32.3, 37.5) 147 stable stable trend 0.9 (-8.1, 10.8)
Morgan County 6,10 Yes 34.8 (29.0, 41.5) 26 stable stable trend 4.1 (-10.2, 20.6)
Calhoun County 6,10 Yes 34.8 (29.1, 41.4) 27 stable stable trend -4.1 (-27.9, 27.5)
Crenshaw County 6,10 Yes 33.6 (19.3, 55.7) 3
*
*
Limestone County 6,10 Yes 33.4 (26.7, 41.3) 18 stable stable trend -5.6 (-22.4, 14.9)
Tuscaloosa County 6,10 Yes 32.8 (28.0, 38.2) 34 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.2, 5.4)
Madison County 6,10 Yes 32.6 (29.1, 36.4) 66 stable stable trend 6.7 (-5.6, 20.6)
Pike County 6,10 Yes 32.4 (21.7, 46.8) 6 stable stable trend -7.5 (-49.3, 68.8)
Cleburne County 6,10 Yes 31.9 (18.1, 53.0) 3
*
*
Lee County 6,10 Yes 31.2 (25.4, 37.9) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-17.9, 18.4)
Blount County 6,10 Yes 30.5 (23.0, 39.8) 12 stable stable trend -8.5 (-36.5, 31.8)
Fayette County 6,10 Yes 30.5 (18.5, 48.8) 4 stable stable trend -15.7 (-57.8, 68.6)
Randolph County 6,10 Yes 29.7 (18.9, 45.0) 5 stable stable trend 3.4 (-24.0, 40.6)
Butler County 6,10 Yes 29.4 (18.3, 45.5) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-32.7, 46.4)
Pickens County 6,10 Yes 29.2 (18.3, 45.3) 4 stable stable trend 28.1 (-25.9, 121.4)
Chilton County 6,10 Yes 24.5 (16.7, 34.8) 7 stable stable trend 19.0 (-26.0, 91.2)
Coffee County 6,10 Yes 24.1 (17.0, 33.3) 8 stable stable trend -19.6 (-46.9, 21.7)
Cherokee County 6,10 Yes 20.2 (12.2, 32.4) 4 stable stable trend 28.1 (-39.9, 172.8)
Bullock County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/15/2017 9:12 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top