Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Alabama 6,10 *** 20.4 (19.9, 21.0) 1,101 stable stable trend -3.4 (-9.3, 2.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 20.7 (20.6, 20.8) 71,035 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.0, 2.6)
Washington County 6,10 *** 20.0 (11.9, 31.6) 4 rising rising trend 36.5 (5.6, 76.4)
Cherokee County 6,10 *** 14.4 (9.0, 22.0) 5 stable stable trend 31.6 (-31.4, 152.7)
Covington County 6,10 *** 21.9 (16.3, 29.1) 11 stable stable trend 12.4 (-14.0, 46.8)
Marengo County 6,10 *** 13.6 (7.9, 22.1) 4 stable stable trend 11.8 (-35.6, 94.1)
Madison County 6,10 *** 19.6 (17.6, 21.8) 73 stable stable trend 11.2 (-6.2, 31.8)
Jackson County 6,10 *** 20.5 (15.7, 26.5) 13 stable stable trend 10.8 (-1.6, 24.8)
Coffee County 6,10 *** 22.2 (17.1, 28.5) 13 stable stable trend 8.8 (-26.7, 61.5)
Limestone County 6,10 *** 18.1 (14.5, 22.5) 17 stable stable trend 7.1 (-20.0, 43.4)
Walker County 6,10 *** 22.5 (17.8, 28.0) 17 stable stable trend 5.9 (-15.8, 33.1)
Russell County 6,10 *** 13.3 (9.4, 18.3) 8 stable stable trend 5.6 (-10.5, 24.6)
Clarke County 6,10 *** 22.0 (15.1, 31.1) 7 stable stable trend 5.1 (-35.8, 72.2)
Marion County 6,10 *** 18.1 (12.4, 25.8) 7 stable stable trend 5.0 (-24.3, 45.5)
Butler County 6,10 *** 15.3 (9.1, 24.2) 4 stable stable trend 4.7 (-37.8, 76.2)
Calhoun County 6,10 *** 16.7 (13.7, 20.1) 23 stable stable trend 3.9 (-11.5, 22.0)
Conecuh County 6,10 *** 22.7 (12.8, 37.3) 4 stable stable trend 3.9 (-42.0, 86.3)
Henry County 6,10 *** 24.0 (15.8, 35.4) 6 stable stable trend 3.6 (-29.5, 52.5)
Chambers County 6,10 *** 17.4 (12.1, 24.2) 8 stable stable trend 3.4 (-23.0, 38.8)
Mobile County 6,10 *** 21.6 (19.7, 23.7) 97 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.1, 6.7)
DeKalb County 6,10 *** 16.0 (12.2, 20.6) 12 stable stable trend 2.3 (-16.3, 25.0)
Lamar County 6,10 *** 24.1 (14.9, 37.4) 5 stable stable trend 2.2 (-35.7, 62.3)
Elmore County 6,10 *** 30.3 (25.2, 36.1) 26 stable stable trend 1.9 (-7.9, 12.7)
Dale County 6,10 *** 23.3 (17.9, 30.0) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-17.8, 25.9)
Barbour County 6,10 *** 10.4 (6.0, 17.1) 3
*
*
Bibb County 6,10 *** 16.6 (10.0, 25.9) 4
*
*
Clay County 6,10 *** 23.3 (13.9, 36.9) 4
*
*
Lee County 6,10 *** 15.0 (12.1, 18.5) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-33.2, 48.5)
Baldwin County 6,10 *** 30.1 (27.0, 33.5) 71 stable stable trend -1.0 (-9.9, 8.7)
Tuscaloosa County 6,10 *** 13.6 (11.2, 16.2) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-32.9, 45.5)
Etowah County 6,10 *** 21.2 (17.6, 25.2) 27 stable stable trend -2.9 (-24.2, 24.6)
Morgan County 6,10 *** 23.8 (20.2, 27.9) 32 stable stable trend -3.3 (-22.9, 21.4)
Franklin County 6,10 *** 20.2 (14.0, 28.1) 7 stable stable trend -4.1 (-35.9, 43.5)
St. Clair County 6,10 *** 23.0 (18.8, 27.9) 22 stable stable trend -4.1 (-39.5, 52.1)
Pickens County 6,10 *** 16.0 (9.6, 25.4) 4 stable stable trend -5.1 (-44.8, 63.1)
Randolph County 6,10 *** 13.9 (8.2, 22.3) 4 stable stable trend -5.5 (-33.2, 33.9)
Cullman County 6,10 *** 30.4 (25.6, 35.9) 30 stable stable trend -6.4 (-27.6, 21.0)
Jefferson County 6,10 *** 16.2 (14.9, 17.6) 118 stable stable trend -7.0 (-23.5, 13.2)
Autauga County 6,10 *** 24.5 (19.2, 31.0) 15 stable stable trend -7.1 (-26.3, 17.2)
Talladega County 6,10 *** 17.7 (13.9, 22.1) 16 stable stable trend -7.9 (-44.4, 52.4)
Geneva County 6,10 *** 29.9 (22.1, 39.7) 10 stable stable trend -9.1 (-19.9, 3.2)
Colbert County 6,10 *** 23.5 (18.6, 29.4) 16 stable stable trend -9.7 (-22.4, 5.1)
Cleburne County 6,10 *** 19.7 (11.5, 31.8) 4 stable stable trend -9.8 (-62.6, 117.7)
Pike County 6,10 *** 27.3 (19.6, 37.0) 9 stable stable trend -9.8 (-32.7, 21.1)
Tallapoosa County 6,10 *** 21.2 (15.9, 28.0) 11 stable stable trend -11.6 (-27.9, 8.4)
Lawrence County 6,10 *** 24.1 (17.9, 31.9) 11 stable stable trend -12.1 (-30.3, 10.8)
Montgomery County 6,10 *** 18.3 (15.9, 21.0) 43 stable stable trend -12.1 (-30.3, 10.9)
Shelby County 6,10 *** 25.7 (22.6, 29.1) 53 stable stable trend -12.1 (-28.0, 7.2)
Marshall County 6,10 *** 20.8 (17.1, 25.1) 23 stable stable trend -12.8 (-51.8, 57.7)
Blount County 6,10 *** 25.2 (19.9, 31.5) 16 falling falling trend -12.9 (-15.7, -10.0)
Fayette County 6,10 *** 23.6 (15.3, 35.2) 5 stable stable trend -13.1 (-37.6, 21.2)
Chilton County 6,10 *** 21.6 (16.1, 28.5) 11 stable stable trend -14.0 (-40.4, 24.3)
Houston County 6,10 *** 23.1 (19.4, 27.5) 27 stable stable trend -14.0 (-26.3, 0.3)
Crenshaw County 6,10 *** 23.3 (13.8, 37.0) 4 stable stable trend -15.7 (-38.7, 15.8)
Dallas County 6,10 *** 11.2 (7.3, 16.6) 5 stable stable trend -17.9 (-56.0, 53.0)
Lauderdale County 6,10 *** 25.8 (21.6, 30.5) 30 stable stable trend -18.3 (-47.9, 28.2)
Escambia County 6,10 *** 16.1 (11.2, 22.3) 7 stable stable trend -19.1 (-37.9, 5.5)
Winston County 6,10 *** 18.7 (12.3, 27.5) 6 falling falling trend -26.4 (-39.7, -10.1)
Bullock County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/26/2018 7:53 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top