Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 483.6 (480.4, 486.9) N/A 17,906 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 449.4 (449.1, 449.7) N/A 1,728,431 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Lawrence County 6 594.1 (547.8, 643.5) 1 (1, 18) 133 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.1, 7.0)
Woodruff County 6 572.8 (502.2, 651.3) 2 (1, 48) 55 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.0)
Poinsett County 6 565.8 (528.3, 605.4) 3 (1, 26) 178 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.8)
Monroe County 6 565.4 (499.3, 638.6) 4 (1, 51) 61 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Randolph County 6 553.2 (510.3, 599.0) 5 (1, 38) 134 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.7)
Jefferson County 6 550.9 (528.4, 574.1) 6 (1, 19) 486 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.6)
Desha County 6 547.7 (494.7, 605.2) 7 (1, 49) 86 stable stable trend 1.7 (0.0, 3.5)
Arkansas County 6 544.5 (502.5, 589.3) 8 (1, 43) 135 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.0)
Searcy County 6 539.3 (479.3, 605.7) 9 (1, 60) 69 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.3, 2.7)
Clay County 6 534.7 (489.9, 582.8) 10 (1, 52) 116 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.8)
Calhoun County 6 532.9 (460.1, 615.6) 11 (1, 68) 42 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.5)
Drew County 6 530.6 (488.2, 575.9) 12 (1, 51) 123 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.1)
Grant County 6 527.4 (485.9, 571.7) 13 (1, 53) 126 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.3)
Sharp County 6 525.4 (484.6, 569.1) 14 (1, 51) 146 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
Lonoke County 6 524.0 (501.2, 547.6) 15 (4, 35) 411 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 1.0)
Cleburne County 6 523.0 (489.9, 558.0) 16 (2, 48) 222 stable stable trend -0.3 (-7.4, 7.5)
Cross County 6 520.1 (476.6, 566.8) 17 (2, 56) 112 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.3)
Ouachita County 6 519.9 (484.6, 557.4) 18 (2, 51) 178 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.4)
Clark County 6 515.4 (475.5, 557.9) 19 (2, 56) 133 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.5)
White County 6 509.6 (488.9, 530.9) 20 (7, 44) 478 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.3)
Union County 6 508.2 (480.4, 537.4) 21 (5, 51) 266 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.6)
Ashley County 6 507.2 (469.6, 547.3) 22 (3, 56) 145 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Cleveland County 6 501.9 (444.0, 565.9) 23 (1, 70) 59 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Van Buren County 6 501.0 (461.3, 543.6) 24 (4, 61) 140 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.2)
Hot Spring County 6 499.4 (469.8, 530.6) 25 (7, 55) 226 rising rising trend 5.4 (0.6, 10.3)
Craighead County 6 499.3 (480.7, 518.4) 26 (11, 48) 560 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.7)
Faulkner County 6 498.8 (480.9, 517.2) 27 (12, 48) 609 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Bradley County 6 498.4 (447.2, 554.3) 28 (2, 67) 73 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 3.0)
Mississippi County 6 496.2 (467.6, 526.1) 29 (8, 56) 237 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.8)
Garland County 6 494.4 (477.7, 511.6) 30 (15, 49) 754 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Greene County 6 489.7 (463.2, 517.5) 31 (10, 57) 263 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.4, 3.3)
Saline County 6 489.7 (473.7, 506.1) 32 (17, 51) 743 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Crittenden County 6 487.7 (461.0, 515.6) 33 (11, 58) 263 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 2.8)
Logan County 6 487.3 (451.8, 525.2) 34 (7, 65) 150 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Jackson County 6 487.3 (446.2, 531.3) 35 (5, 67) 109 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Lee County 6 486.7 (432.0, 546.9) 36 (2, 72) 61 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.8)
Pulaski County 6 486.6 (477.4, 496.0) 37 (24, 48) 2,231 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.5, -0.1)
Nevada County 6 484.9 (428.3, 547.5) 38 (3, 72) 58 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.8)
Independence County 6 481.1 (452.9, 510.6) 39 (13, 64) 229 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Dallas County 6 480.0 (421.1, 545.8) 40 (2, 73) 54 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.6)
Boone County 6 479.6 (452.6, 507.9) 41 (14, 62) 256 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Franklin County 6 476.5 (437.3, 518.6) 42 (8, 69) 116 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Conway County 6 474.6 (438.6, 513.0) 43 (11, 68) 138 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Sebastian County 6 473.5 (457.8, 489.7) 44 (26, 57) 717 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
Chicot County 6 471.9 (422.9, 525.5) 45 (6, 72) 74 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.4)
Pope County 6 471.4 (449.1, 494.5) 46 (21, 63) 351 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Perry County 6 470.7 (419.9, 526.5) 47 (5, 73) 68 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Baxter County 6 469.8 (445.9, 494.8) 48 (21, 64) 372 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Prairie County 6 469.5 (414.9, 530.0) 49 (4, 74) 61 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Phillips County 6 467.1 (427.9, 509.1) 50 (11, 70) 115 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 1.9)
Crawford County 6 467.0 (445.3, 489.6) 51 (24, 64) 364 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.2)
Fulton County 6 460.8 (415.1, 510.7) 52 (10, 73) 91 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Johnson County 6 460.7 (427.2, 496.1) 53 (16, 69) 148 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.9)
Polk County 6 459.7 (424.5, 497.3) 54 (17, 71) 141 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Carroll County 6 452.3 (422.4, 484.0) 55 (25, 71) 195 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 1.9)
Scott County 6 450.7 (401.9, 504.3) 56 (9, 75) 67 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.6)
Little River County 6 448.5 (403.9, 497.2) 57 (15, 74) 81 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Pike County 6 448.0 (399.6, 501.2) 58 (13, 74) 67 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Marion County 6 444.8 (408.2, 484.4) 59 (23, 73) 138 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Washington County 6 444.0 (431.4, 456.9) 60 (47, 67) 970 stable stable trend -3.8 (-8.4, 0.9)
St. Francis County 6 443.2 (410.2, 478.3) 61 (27, 73) 140 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.6, 7.4)
Benton County 6 440.7 (429.6, 452.0) 62 (50, 68) 1,224 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Montgomery County 6 433.5 (383.5, 489.2) 63 (18, 75) 67 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Miller County 6 431.2 (406.1, 457.5) 64 (44, 73) 231 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Madison County 6 429.9 (390.7, 472.2) 65 (27, 74) 95 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Yell County 6 427.1 (392.6, 463.9) 66 (37, 74) 119 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Stone County 6 425.7 (383.7, 471.7) 67 (28, 75) 93 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Lafayette County 6 419.3 (363.0, 483.0) 68 (18, 75) 46 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.3)
Columbia County 6 412.9 (378.7, 449.5) 69 (46, 75) 117 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Lincoln County 6 409.5 (365.7, 457.4) 70 (36, 75) 65 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Izard County 6 405.7 (366.9, 448.0) 71 (44, 75) 92 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Hempstead County 6 400.9 (367.5, 436.7) 72 (52, 75) 114 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Howard County 6 384.0 (341.8, 430.1) 73 (52, 75) 65 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Newton County 6 383.7 (335.4, 438.2) 74 (48, 75) 53 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Sevier County 6 360.6 (322.6, 402.0) 75 (65, 75) 68 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2022 7:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top