Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 243.5 (240.9, 246.1) N/A 7,370 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 225.0 (224.8, 225.3) N/A 726,500 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)
Lincoln County 6 179.6 (148.7, 215.6) 75 (47, 75) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 2.9)
Sevier County 6 188.0 (157.9, 222.1) 74 (39, 75) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.5)
Newton County 6 197.4 (153.9, 250.5) 73 (14, 75) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.0)
Hempstead County 6 200.1 (173.5, 229.8) 72 (32, 75) 46 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.8)
St. Francis County 6 207.3 (183.0, 234.1) 71 (35, 75) 56 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.1, 13.2)
Izard County 6 210.6 (177.0, 249.5) 70 (17, 75) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Washington County 6 211.5 (202.6, 220.8) 69 (52, 73) 435 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.2, 0.9)
Columbia County 6 212.9 (184.7, 244.4) 68 (22, 75) 46 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.6)
Yell County 6 214.5 (186.9, 245.3) 67 (20, 75) 47 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.3)
Benton County 6 214.8 (206.7, 223.1) 66 (50, 71) 546 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.6)
Stone County 6 215.1 (179.2, 256.9) 65 (12, 75) 32 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Polk County 6 217.1 (188.1, 249.7) 64 (17, 75) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Pike County 6 218.1 (179.6, 262.9) 63 (9, 75) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.3)
Perry County 6 218.4 (178.9, 264.7) 62 (8, 75) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.2)
Nevada County 6 219.6 (176.2, 271.3) 61 (5, 75) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.1)
Lee County 6 219.8 (178.0, 269.2) 60 (7, 75) 21 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.3)
Howard County 6 220.1 (183.7, 261.9) 59 (10, 75) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Marion County 6 221.0 (188.9, 257.7) 58 (13, 75) 47 falling falling trend -4.2 (-9.8, -1.5)
Madison County 6 221.9 (190.4, 257.5) 57 (12, 75) 40 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.4)
Phillips County 6 224.1 (193.3, 258.6) 56 (12, 75) 44 stable stable trend -6.8 (-17.4, 1.6)
Pope County 6 225.4 (208.5, 243.4) 55 (27, 71) 141 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Independence County 6 230.1 (208.1, 253.9) 54 (17, 72) 87 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.8)
Little River County 6 230.6 (194.6, 271.9) 53 (7, 75) 32 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 4.2)
Johnson County 6 230.9 (204.7, 259.7) 52 (14, 73) 61 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.9)
Miller County 6 231.0 (210.7, 252.9) 51 (19, 72) 102 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Faulkner County 6 232.4 (219.9, 245.6) 50 (26, 66) 268 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Calhoun County 6 237.8 (180.5, 309.3) 49 (1, 75) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.0, 5.5)
Crawford County 6 237.8 (220.8, 255.9) 48 (17, 66) 157 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Ashley County 6 239.4 (209.4, 272.9) 47 (9, 72) 51 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 3.1)
Dallas County 6 240.0 (191.0, 298.9) 46 (1, 75) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Crittenden County 6 240.5 (220.7, 261.6) 45 (14, 66) 117 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.4, 3.8)
Saline County 6 240.5 (228.0, 253.5) 44 (21, 60) 294 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Cleveland County 6 240.7 (194.0, 296.1) 43 (1, 75) 21 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.1, 4.9)
Chicot County 6 240.9 (199.6, 288.9) 42 (3, 74) 28 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.7)
Lafayette County 6 241.0 (190.4, 302.4) 41 (1, 75) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.0, 5.3)
Carroll County 6 241.0 (215.2, 269.3) 40 (9, 70) 76 rising rising trend 5.0 (0.5, 12.0)
Bradley County 6 241.2 (200.9, 287.6) 39 (4, 74) 27 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.6)
Pulaski County 6 241.2 (234.2, 248.4) 38 (27, 55) 967 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
Conway County 6 241.2 (212.2, 273.5) 37 (8, 71) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Jackson County 6 244.0 (211.1, 280.8) 36 (5, 72) 43 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Boone County 6 245.0 (222.3, 269.5) 35 (10, 67) 95 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.4)
Baxter County 6 245.8 (223.5, 269.9) 34 (10, 65) 112 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Montgomery County 6 246.5 (200.8, 300.8) 33 (1, 75) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.1)
Clay County 6 249.2 (213.3, 289.7) 32 (3, 73) 39 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 5.4)
Lonoke County 6 249.2 (232.9, 266.4) 31 (12, 57) 181 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Sebastian County 6 249.3 (236.8, 262.3) 30 (16, 54) 322 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Fulton County 6 250.2 (209.3, 297.3) 29 (2, 74) 32 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.6)
Greene County 6 250.7 (229.8, 273.0) 28 (9, 61) 111 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.7, 7.7)
Scott County 6 253.6 (211.5, 302.3) 27 (2, 73) 29 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.0, 4.3)
Craighead County 6 254.2 (240.0, 269.0) 26 (11, 51) 251 stable stable trend 3.8 (-2.3, 11.6)
Van Buren County 6 254.3 (219.7, 293.3) 25 (3, 71) 47 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.9, 3.8)
Garland County 6 255.6 (241.1, 270.8) 24 (10, 49) 267 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Logan County 6 256.0 (226.5, 288.6) 23 (5, 65) 61 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
White County 6 256.5 (240.3, 273.6) 22 (9, 52) 199 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.4, 4.5)
Union County 6 261.5 (238.9, 285.7) 21 (5, 55) 111 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 2.8)
Hot Spring County 6 262.4 (238.3, 288.5) 20 (5, 56) 95 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.4, 10.7)
Grant County 6 262.5 (230.6, 297.9) 19 (2, 64) 53 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.2)
Randolph County 6 263.0 (229.0, 300.9) 18 (2, 64) 47 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.7, 3.9)
Prairie County 6 267.8 (219.8, 324.2) 17 (1, 72) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Cross County 6 268.0 (232.6, 307.5) 16 (1, 63) 45 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.5, 4.5)
Franklin County 6 268.0 (233.8, 306.0) 15 (2, 65) 49 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.2)
Ouachita County 6 268.9 (239.4, 301.4) 14 (2, 57) 71 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.3, 14.1)
Drew County 6 273.6 (238.7, 312.2) 13 (1, 60) 50 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.5)
Mississippi County 6 275.9 (252.9, 300.5) 12 (2, 45) 116 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.0, 3.4)
Desha County 6 279.2 (235.4, 329.2) 11 (1, 67) 33 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 4.4)
Clark County 6 279.5 (245.9, 316.5) 10 (1, 56) 56 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.5, 12.2)
Cleburne County 6 280.9 (250.7, 314.0) 9 (1, 50) 75 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 1.2)
Arkansas County 6 291.9 (257.2, 330.3) 8 (1, 46) 58 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 3.7)
Poinsett County 6 298.5 (267.6, 332.3) 7 (1, 37) 74 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.5)
Sharp County 6 300.4 (262.3, 342.8) 6 (1, 43) 53 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 3.9)
Woodruff County 6 301.5 (239.3, 375.5) 5 (1, 69) 19 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.1, 6.7)
Monroe County 6 307.3 (249.1, 376.1) 4 (1, 63) 24 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.2)
Jefferson County 6 308.5 (289.7, 328.3) 3 (1, 14) 224 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.9, 2.1)
Searcy County 6 310.8 (256.2, 374.6) 2 (1, 59) 27 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.7)
Lawrence County 6 320.9 (281.7, 364.3) 1 (1, 25) 55 stable stable trend 6.1 (-5.1, 17.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/20/2024 5:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top