Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 243.5 (240.9, 246.1) N/A 7,370 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 225.0 (224.8, 225.3) N/A 726,500 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)
Phillips County 6 224.1 (193.3, 258.6) 56 (12, 75) 44 stable stable trend -6.8 (-17.4, 1.6)
Marion County 6 221.0 (188.9, 257.7) 58 (13, 75) 47 falling falling trend -4.2 (-9.8, -1.5)
Washington County 6 211.5 (202.6, 220.8) 69 (52, 73) 435 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.2, 0.9)
Newton County 6 197.4 (153.9, 250.5) 73 (14, 75) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.0)
Izard County 6 210.6 (177.0, 249.5) 70 (17, 75) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Polk County 6 217.1 (188.1, 249.7) 64 (17, 75) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Conway County 6 241.2 (212.2, 273.5) 37 (8, 71) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Montgomery County 6 246.5 (200.8, 300.8) 33 (1, 75) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.1)
Jackson County 6 244.0 (211.1, 280.8) 36 (5, 72) 43 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Pope County 6 225.4 (208.5, 243.4) 55 (27, 71) 141 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Baxter County 6 245.8 (223.5, 269.9) 34 (10, 65) 112 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Lonoke County 6 249.2 (232.9, 266.4) 31 (12, 57) 181 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Lincoln County 6 179.6 (148.7, 215.6) 75 (47, 75) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 2.9)
Pulaski County 6 241.2 (234.2, 248.4) 38 (27, 55) 967 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
Sevier County 6 188.0 (157.9, 222.1) 74 (39, 75) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.5)
Independence County 6 230.1 (208.1, 253.9) 54 (17, 72) 87 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.8)
Saline County 6 240.5 (228.0, 253.5) 44 (21, 60) 294 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Yell County 6 214.5 (186.9, 245.3) 67 (20, 75) 47 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.3)
Cleburne County 6 280.9 (250.7, 314.0) 9 (1, 50) 75 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 1.2)
Dallas County 6 240.0 (191.0, 298.9) 46 (1, 75) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Hempstead County 6 200.1 (173.5, 229.8) 72 (32, 75) 46 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.8)
Perry County 6 218.4 (178.9, 264.7) 62 (8, 75) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.2)
Prairie County 6 267.8 (219.8, 324.2) 17 (1, 72) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Faulkner County 6 232.4 (219.9, 245.6) 50 (26, 66) 268 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Logan County 6 256.0 (226.5, 288.6) 23 (5, 65) 61 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Madison County 6 221.9 (190.4, 257.5) 57 (12, 75) 40 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.4)
Howard County 6 220.1 (183.7, 261.9) 59 (10, 75) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Columbia County 6 212.9 (184.7, 244.4) 68 (22, 75) 46 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.6)
Nevada County 6 219.6 (176.2, 271.3) 61 (5, 75) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.1)
Miller County 6 231.0 (210.7, 252.9) 51 (19, 72) 102 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Franklin County 6 268.0 (233.8, 306.0) 15 (2, 65) 49 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.2)
Stone County 6 215.1 (179.2, 256.9) 65 (12, 75) 32 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Benton County 6 214.8 (206.7, 223.1) 66 (50, 71) 546 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.6)
Crawford County 6 237.8 (220.8, 255.9) 48 (17, 66) 157 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Ashley County 6 239.4 (209.4, 272.9) 47 (9, 72) 51 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 3.1)
Garland County 6 255.6 (241.1, 270.8) 24 (10, 49) 267 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Pike County 6 218.1 (179.6, 262.9) 63 (9, 75) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.3)
Poinsett County 6 298.5 (267.6, 332.3) 7 (1, 37) 74 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.5)
Sebastian County 6 249.3 (236.8, 262.3) 30 (16, 54) 322 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Drew County 6 273.6 (238.7, 312.2) 13 (1, 60) 50 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.5)
Lafayette County 6 241.0 (190.4, 302.4) 41 (1, 75) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.0, 5.3)
Lee County 6 219.8 (178.0, 269.2) 60 (7, 75) 21 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.3)
Chicot County 6 240.9 (199.6, 288.9) 42 (3, 74) 28 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.7)
Fulton County 6 250.2 (209.3, 297.3) 29 (2, 74) 32 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.6)
Grant County 6 262.5 (230.6, 297.9) 19 (2, 64) 53 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.2)
Union County 6 261.5 (238.9, 285.7) 21 (5, 55) 111 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 2.8)
Boone County 6 245.0 (222.3, 269.5) 35 (10, 67) 95 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.4)
Calhoun County 6 237.8 (180.5, 309.3) 49 (1, 75) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.0, 5.5)
Jefferson County 6 308.5 (289.7, 328.3) 3 (1, 14) 224 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.9, 2.1)
Monroe County 6 307.3 (249.1, 376.1) 4 (1, 63) 24 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.2)
Randolph County 6 263.0 (229.0, 300.9) 18 (2, 64) 47 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.7, 3.9)
Johnson County 6 230.9 (204.7, 259.7) 52 (14, 73) 61 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.9)
Scott County 6 253.6 (211.5, 302.3) 27 (2, 73) 29 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.0, 4.3)
Little River County 6 230.6 (194.6, 271.9) 53 (7, 75) 32 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 4.2)
Desha County 6 279.2 (235.4, 329.2) 11 (1, 67) 33 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 4.4)
Bradley County 6 241.2 (200.9, 287.6) 39 (4, 74) 27 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.6)
Crittenden County 6 240.5 (220.7, 261.6) 45 (14, 66) 117 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.4, 3.8)
Searcy County 6 310.8 (256.2, 374.6) 2 (1, 59) 27 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.7)
Sharp County 6 300.4 (262.3, 342.8) 6 (1, 43) 53 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 3.9)
Arkansas County 6 291.9 (257.2, 330.3) 8 (1, 46) 58 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 3.7)
Mississippi County 6 275.9 (252.9, 300.5) 12 (2, 45) 116 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.0, 3.4)
Van Buren County 6 254.3 (219.7, 293.3) 25 (3, 71) 47 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.9, 3.8)
Cleveland County 6 240.7 (194.0, 296.1) 43 (1, 75) 21 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.1, 4.9)
Cross County 6 268.0 (232.6, 307.5) 16 (1, 63) 45 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.5, 4.5)
Greene County 6 250.7 (229.8, 273.0) 28 (9, 61) 111 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.7, 7.7)
White County 6 256.5 (240.3, 273.6) 22 (9, 52) 199 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.4, 4.5)
Clay County 6 249.2 (213.3, 289.7) 32 (3, 73) 39 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 5.4)
Woodruff County 6 301.5 (239.3, 375.5) 5 (1, 69) 19 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.1, 6.7)
Clark County 6 279.5 (245.9, 316.5) 10 (1, 56) 56 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.5, 12.2)
Craighead County 6 254.2 (240.0, 269.0) 26 (11, 51) 251 stable stable trend 3.8 (-2.3, 11.6)
Hot Spring County 6 262.4 (238.3, 288.5) 20 (5, 56) 95 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.4, 10.7)
Ouachita County 6 268.9 (239.4, 301.4) 14 (2, 57) 71 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.3, 14.1)
St. Francis County 6 207.3 (183.0, 234.1) 71 (35, 75) 56 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.1, 13.2)
Carroll County 6 241.0 (215.2, 269.3) 40 (9, 70) 76 rising rising trend 5.0 (0.5, 12.0)
Lawrence County 6 320.9 (281.7, 364.3) 1 (1, 25) 55 stable stable trend 6.1 (-5.1, 17.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 7:05 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top