Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 526.4 (521.5, 531.3) N/A 9,309 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 480.6 (480.1, 481.1) N/A 863,255 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Pulaski County 6 534.4 (520.0, 549.1) 33 (22, 48) 1,121 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Benton County 6 459.7 (443.4, 476.5) 64 (53, 71) 615 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Washington County 6 453.1 (434.5, 472.3) 69 (54, 72) 472 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.9, -2.9)
Garland County 6 554.9 (530.0, 580.9) 25 (11, 46) 409 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.4)
Saline County 6 529.4 (505.6, 554.0) 38 (18, 54) 391 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Sebastian County 6 506.3 (482.7, 530.9) 50 (27, 63) 363 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Faulkner County 6 537.1 (509.9, 565.3) 32 (14, 56) 312 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Craighead County 6 559.3 (530.2, 589.6) 21 (9, 46) 287 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.2, 8.0)
Jefferson County 6 644.3 (608.7, 681.5) 6 (1, 16) 264 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
White County 6 509.6 (479.8, 540.9) 48 (21, 65) 227 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Lonoke County 6 582.9 (547.6, 619.9) 15 (5, 39) 216 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Baxter County 6 526.2 (491.2, 563.4) 41 (14, 61) 206 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 3.9)
Crawford County 6 512.2 (479.7, 546.4) 47 (21, 64) 195 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 0.7)
Pope County 6 531.5 (497.8, 567.0) 36 (14, 59) 192 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.7)
Greene County 6 570.2 (528.4, 614.5) 18 (6, 51) 143 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.6, 8.1)
Union County 6 563.5 (520.4, 609.4) 19 (6, 53) 136 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Boone County 6 494.6 (456.3, 535.6) 54 (21, 71) 130 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Mississippi County 6 585.5 (539.2, 634.7) 13 (3, 46) 129 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.6)
Crittenden County 6 501.6 (461.4, 544.4) 52 (18, 70) 125 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.3, 9.4)
Hot Spring County 6 557.8 (513.6, 605.1) 22 (7, 55) 124 stable stable trend 7.9 (-0.2, 13.9)
Cleburne County 6 553.4 (507.3, 603.3) 26 (7, 59) 120 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Independence County 6 500.9 (459.6, 545.2) 53 (20, 70) 113 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Miller County 6 423.7 (387.8, 462.1) 73 (56, 75) 108 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Carroll County 6 482.7 (440.3, 528.6) 57 (25, 73) 107 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.9)
Poinsett County 6 654.7 (595.2, 718.8) 4 (1, 23) 94 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.0, 6.6)
Ouachita County 6 594.9 (539.6, 654.9) 11 (2, 48) 93 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Johnson County 6 514.9 (465.1, 568.7) 44 (11, 70) 82 stable stable trend 1.3 (-9.5, 10.0)
Logan County 6 540.2 (487.7, 597.4) 30 (7, 65) 82 stable stable trend 0.1 (-9.2, 7.8)
Sharp County 6 570.6 (513.5, 633.3) 17 (3, 59) 82 stable stable trend 7.7 (-0.3, 14.4)
Polk County 6 526.8 (474.5, 584.0) 40 (9, 68) 80 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 3.8)
Marion County 6 483.5 (432.1, 540.8) 56 (20, 73) 78 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Ashley County 6 555.4 (499.4, 616.5) 24 (5, 62) 77 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Clark County 6 612.7 (551.0, 679.8) 9 (1, 47) 76 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.6)
Van Buren County 6 530.7 (475.8, 591.3) 37 (7, 68) 76 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.2)
St. Francis County 6 477.6 (428.8, 530.6) 60 (23, 74) 74 stable stable trend 0.3 (-7.3, 2.2)
Lawrence County 6 695.1 (623.6, 773.1) 1 (1, 15) 74 stable stable trend 3.1 (-5.2, 12.6)
Conway County 6 513.9 (460.9, 571.8) 45 (11, 71) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Drew County 6 680.7 (610.5, 757.1) 3 (1, 20) 73 rising rising trend 7.7 (0.3, 19.9)
Randolph County 6 628.3 (563.3, 699.2) 7 (1, 41) 72 rising rising trend 6.8 (3.4, 13.7)
Arkansas County 6 613.3 (548.9, 683.8) 8 (1, 49) 71 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Grant County 6 550.2 (490.6, 615.7) 27 (5, 66) 65 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Yell County 6 456.8 (406.0, 512.5) 67 (30, 74) 62 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Phillips County 6 544.5 (482.5, 612.7) 29 (5, 68) 61 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
Columbia County 6 457.9 (405.9, 515.0) 65 (26, 74) 60 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.2)
Franklin County 6 513.7 (455.5, 577.8) 46 (10, 72) 60 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 1.0)
Clay County 6 589.4 (522.4, 663.3) 12 (1, 56) 60 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.8)
Hempstead County 6 432.7 (383.4, 487.0) 72 (43, 75) 59 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Fulton County 6 573.2 (505.4, 649.1) 16 (2, 63) 59 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.3)
Cross County 6 562.3 (496.9, 634.4) 20 (3, 65) 57 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Jackson County 6 538.3 (475.3, 607.7) 31 (5, 69) 56 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.9)
Stone County 6 503.1 (441.4, 572.7) 51 (9, 73) 56 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Izard County 6 469.6 (413.9, 532.0) 63 (18, 74) 55 stable stable trend 7.7 (-1.6, 15.1)
Madison County 6 453.9 (397.3, 516.8) 68 (27, 75) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.3)
Desha County 6 649.3 (564.9, 743.7) 5 (1, 45) 47 rising rising trend 9.2 (1.6, 19.0)
Little River County 6 470.4 (406.0, 543.2) 62 (16, 75) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.6)
Chicot County 6 533.8 (459.1, 618.3) 34 (3, 73) 38 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.1)
Lincoln County 6 479.5 (411.6, 555.7) 59 (10, 74) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 3.0)
Searcy County 6 557.1 (474.1, 652.7) 23 (2, 70) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.6)
Pike County 6 481.9 (412.2, 561.3) 58 (10, 75) 36 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.6)
Bradley County 6 516.2 (441.2, 601.1) 43 (6, 73) 35 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.3)
Montgomery County 6 435.1 (368.7, 512.6) 71 (25, 75) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Scott County 6 457.7 (390.3, 534.6) 66 (16, 75) 35 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Perry County 6 477.1 (406.3, 557.8) 61 (13, 75) 35 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Cleveland County 6 585.4 (498.1, 685.4) 14 (1, 68) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Monroe County 6 681.8 (577.7, 801.5) 2 (1, 43) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Prairie County 6 549.1 (464.4, 646.4) 28 (1, 72) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.1)
Sevier County 6 350.5 (297.1, 410.9) 75 (68, 75) 32 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
Nevada County 6 532.2 (448.8, 628.1) 35 (2, 73) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.2)
Howard County 6 383.0 (322.5, 452.1) 74 (54, 75) 30 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.8)
Lee County 6 492.5 (416.0, 580.1) 55 (8, 74) 30 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.2)
Newton County 6 436.6 (363.2, 523.0) 70 (19, 75) 29 rising rising trend 11.7 (2.0, 19.6)
Lafayette County 6 525.8 (437.0, 630.0) 42 (2, 74) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.2)
Dallas County 6 527.9 (438.2, 632.4) 39 (2, 74) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.5)
Woodruff County 6 602.9 (499.9, 722.6) 10 (1, 68) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
Calhoun County 6 508.0 (408.1, 628.2) 49 (2, 75) 20 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.8, 5.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/24/2024 4:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top