Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 467.5 (464.4, 470.7) N/A 17,563 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 442.3 (442.0, 442.6) N/A 1,698,328 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Arkansas County 6 520.5 (479.4, 564.4) 10 (1, 49) 128 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Ashley County 6 473.4 (437.0, 512.2) 33 (8, 64) 136 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Baxter County 6 475.4 (451.3, 500.6) 32 (12, 56) 379 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Benton County 6 426.2 (415.5, 437.1) 59 (49, 68) 1,226 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.4)
Boone County 6 472.9 (446.2, 501.0) 34 (12, 59) 254 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Bradley County 6 469.4 (419.7, 523.8) 37 (4, 71) 69 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.0)
Calhoun County 6 490.6 (419.4, 571.9) 24 (1, 73) 38 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 5.3)
Carroll County 6 436.5 (407.1, 467.6) 57 (26, 72) 190 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.2)
Chicot County 6 457.9 (408.6, 512.1) 46 (7, 72) 70 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.1)
Clark County 6 504.4 (465.1, 546.3) 15 (2, 55) 132 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.5, 8.6)
Clay County 6 512.3 (468.9, 559.1) 13 (1, 54) 112 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 2.9)
Cleburne County 6 507.1 (474.3, 541.9) 14 (3, 47) 215 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Cleveland County 6 491.3 (433.9, 554.9) 22 (1, 70) 58 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Columbia County 6 384.4 (351.5, 419.7) 72 (53, 75) 109 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Conway County 6 465.3 (429.8, 503.1) 41 (10, 67) 137 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Craighead County 6 490.1 (471.9, 508.8) 26 (10, 44) 563 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.7, 4.3)
Crawford County 6 456.2 (434.9, 478.3) 48 (23, 63) 364 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.5)
Crittenden County 6 458.2 (432.4, 485.1) 45 (16, 64) 249 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.1)
Cross County 6 514.1 (470.8, 560.5) 12 (1, 52) 111 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.7)
Dallas County 6 458.9 (401.1, 523.8) 43 (3, 74) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.2)
Desha County 6 539.0 (485.9, 596.6) 6 (1, 46) 83 rising rising trend 12.0 (0.4, 23.0)
Drew County 6 534.1 (491.3, 579.8) 9 (1, 40) 124 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.4)
Faulkner County 6 470.4 (453.3, 488.0) 36 (18, 54) 593 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 4.3)
Franklin County 6 475.9 (436.2, 518.4) 31 (6, 66) 115 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Fulton County 6 458.5 (413.6, 507.5) 44 (6, 72) 94 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Garland County 6 476.4 (460.1, 493.2) 30 (16, 51) 735 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.1)
Grant County 6 490.9 (451.4, 533.1) 23 (4, 58) 120 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6)
Greene County 6 485.4 (459.1, 512.8) 28 (8, 54) 264 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.3, 4.2)
Hempstead County 6 383.2 (350.8, 417.9) 73 (53, 75) 111 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Hot Spring County 6 494.9 (465.5, 525.7) 19 (5, 52) 226 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.6, 9.9)
Howard County 6 368.2 (326.6, 413.9) 74 (53, 75) 62 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Independence County 6 457.2 (429.9, 485.9) 47 (18, 65) 221 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Izard County 6 408.4 (369.7, 450.7) 69 (33, 75) 93 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.9, 6.9)
Jackson County 6 477.4 (436.6, 521.3) 29 (5, 66) 107 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Jefferson County 6 547.2 (524.7, 570.4) 4 (1, 15) 482 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.6)
Johnson County 6 470.9 (437.3, 506.5) 35 (9, 63) 154 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 2.1)
Lafayette County 6 437.0 (379.4, 502.2) 56 (8, 75) 48 stable stable trend 11.8 (-0.6, 22.8)
Lawrence County 6 599.8 (553.6, 649.0) 1 (1, 10) 136 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.6, 12.1)
Lee County 6 450.4 (397.9, 508.6) 51 (6, 74) 57 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.0)
Lincoln County 6 405.6 (362.1, 453.3) 70 (28, 75) 65 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.8)
Little River County 6 416.7 (374.3, 463.1) 64 (24, 75) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.7)
Logan County 6 493.8 (458.1, 531.7) 20 (4, 55) 153 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.5, 7.7)
Lonoke County 6 500.5 (478.4, 523.2) 17 (6, 41) 402 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 1.1)
Madison County 6 414.8 (376.6, 456.2) 66 (29, 75) 93 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Marion County 6 439.4 (403.1, 478.7) 55 (18, 73) 138 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Miller County 6 412.9 (388.4, 438.6) 68 (47, 74) 223 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Mississippi County 6 501.5 (472.6, 531.7) 16 (4, 47) 238 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.4, 8.1)
Monroe County 6 534.5 (469.3, 607.2) 8 (1, 57) 57 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Montgomery County 6 419.3 (370.1, 474.3) 62 (14, 75) 65 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Nevada County 6 446.6 (392.7, 506.5) 52 (6, 74) 54 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Newton County 6 404.5 (353.7, 461.8) 71 (22, 75) 55 rising rising trend 9.1 (0.2, 17.4)
Ouachita County 6 498.0 (463.1, 535.0) 18 (3, 54) 170 stable stable trend 3.2 (-5.1, 11.4)
Perry County 6 427.3 (379.3, 480.3) 58 (17, 75) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Phillips County 6 445.0 (407.0, 485.7) 53 (14, 72) 111 stable stable trend 0.4 (-6.2, 1.7)
Pike County 6 422.1 (375.4, 473.6) 61 (16, 75) 64 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Poinsett County 6 553.2 (515.8, 592.8) 3 (1, 25) 172 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
Polk County 6 440.1 (405.7, 477.0) 54 (19, 72) 136 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 5.0)
Pope County 6 466.2 (444.2, 488.9) 40 (17, 58) 354 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Prairie County 6 454.5 (401.0, 514.2) 49 (6, 74) 59 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Pulaski County 6 467.6 (458.6, 476.7) 39 (25, 50) 2,178 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Randolph County 6 517.7 (476.6, 561.5) 11 (1, 50) 127 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.6, 10.4)
Saline County 6 468.6 (453.1, 484.5) 38 (21, 54) 729 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Scott County 6 454.3 (405.0, 508.5) 50 (6, 73) 67 rising rising trend 8.6 (0.7, 14.5)
Searcy County 6 541.9 (481.8, 608.4) 5 (1, 52) 70 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 3.0)
Sebastian County 6 462.1 (446.7, 478.0) 42 (23, 57) 712 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.1)
Sevier County 6 341.2 (304.2, 381.5) 75 (67, 75) 64 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Sharp County 6 538.9 (497.4, 583.3) 7 (1, 37) 151 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.5)
St. Francis County 6 419.2 (387.1, 453.5) 63 (35, 74) 132 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.5, 12.0)
Stone County 6 414.8 (374.4, 459.2) 65 (26, 75) 94 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Union County 6 488.0 (460.6, 516.8) 27 (8, 53) 253 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.6)
Van Buren County 6 491.6 (452.6, 533.7) 21 (3, 58) 139 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.3)
Washington County 6 414.5 (402.5, 426.7) 67 (53, 71) 933 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.8, -0.7)
White County 6 490.5 (470.3, 511.3) 25 (9, 46) 466 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 2.7)
Woodruff County 6 554.5 (484.2, 633.0) 2 (1, 56) 53 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.8)
Yell County 6 422.7 (388.2, 459.6) 60 (30, 74) 117 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/23/2024 12:56 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top