Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 *** 111.9 (109.7, 114.1) N/A 1,968 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.1 (105.9, 106.3) N/A 209,535 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Pulaski County 6 *** 114.6 (108.5, 120.8) 35 (17, 51) 273 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.1)
Benton County 6 *** 97.5 (90.9, 104.5) 60 (40, 68) 164 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.2)
Washington County 6 *** 103.7 (96.2, 111.6) 56 (29, 65) 144 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.9, 3.4)
Sebastian County 6 *** 115.6 (105.1, 127.0) 30 (10, 57) 89 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.2, 3.7)
Saline County 6 *** 114.4 (103.6, 125.9) 37 (10, 59) 83 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.4)
Faulkner County 6 *** 110.4 (99.9, 121.8) 48 (13, 63) 82 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Craighead County 6 *** 121.0 (109.1, 133.7) 15 (6, 51) 77 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.1)
Garland County 6 *** 116.2 (103.6, 130.0) 29 (7, 61) 62 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.1)
Lonoke County 6 *** 117.7 (104.1, 132.5) 27 (7, 61) 55 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
White County 6 *** 116.5 (102.8, 131.5) 26 (6, 60) 53 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Jefferson County 6 *** 125.7 (110.5, 142.5) 11 (4, 56) 50 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.6, 3.3)
Crawford County 6 *** 112.2 (97.4, 128.5) 41 (8, 67) 42 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.2)
Pope County 6 *** 103.7 (89.2, 119.7) 57 (14, 70) 38 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 2.8)
Greene County 6 *** 119.5 (101.9, 139.2) 20 (4, 64) 33 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Miller County 6 *** 111.1 (93.7, 130.8) 47 (7, 69) 29 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.3)
Mississippi County 6 *** 114.8 (96.4, 135.6) 31 (5, 67) 28 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 3.7)
Crittenden County 6 *** 95.6 (80.3, 113.0) 64 (21, 73) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.0)
Independence County 6 *** 120.2 (100.5, 142.7) 19 (3, 67) 26 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 3.8)
Union County 6 *** 113.6 (94.8, 135.0) 39 (5, 68) 26 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 4.4)
Hot Spring County 6 *** 114.8 (94.9, 137.7) 36 (4, 69) 23 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.2)
Boone County 6 *** 106.2 (87.4, 127.8) 53 (8, 71) 22 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.4)
Baxter County 6 *** 111.5 (91.2, 135.0) 43 (6, 71) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Johnson County 6 *** 115.6 (92.6, 142.5) 32 (4, 70) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.4)
Lawrence County 6 *** 184.9 (147.1, 229.3) 2 (1, 19) 17 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.7, 8.0)
Cleburne County 6 *** 123.3 (97.5, 153.8) 14 (2, 68) 16 stable stable trend 10.7 (-4.0, 27.6)
Ouachita County 6 *** 118.7 (93.7, 148.3) 23 (3, 71) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.0)
St. Francis County 6 *** 92.2 (72.6, 115.5) 67 (15, 74) 15 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.5, 6.6)
Clark County 6 *** 130.2 (101.7, 164.0) 7 (1, 67) 15 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.9, 4.6)
Columbia County 6 *** 119.7 (93.6, 150.6) 21 (2, 71) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.9, 5.4)
Poinsett County 6 *** 103.0 (80.4, 129.7) 54 (6, 73) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.2)
Randolph County 6 *** 148.3 (115.9, 186.8) 3 (1, 54) 14 stable stable trend -12.1 (-25.5, 3.7)
Carroll County 6 *** 96.9 (75.6, 122.2) 62 (11, 74) 14 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 4.4)
Cross County 6 *** 142.6 (111.1, 180.1) 4 (1, 63) 14 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.1, 6.1)
Hempstead County 6 *** 112.9 (87.5, 143.0) 40 (3, 72) 14 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.6, 4.6)
Ashley County 6 *** 107.5 (82.6, 137.4) 51 (4, 73) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Logan County 6 *** 102.7 (78.8, 131.6) 58 (6, 74) 13 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 4.8)
Yell County 6 *** 98.1 (75.1, 125.8) 61 (8, 74) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.5)
Arkansas County 6 *** 117.7 (89.7, 151.4) 28 (2, 72) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.1, 5.0)
Conway County 6 *** 104.4 (79.5, 134.3) 55 (5, 74) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.6)
Jackson County 6 *** 111.8 (85.0, 144.3) 42 (3, 73) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.2, 4.1)
Phillips County 6 *** 121.2 (91.8, 156.7) 18 (2, 71) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.8)
Franklin County 6 *** 113.8 (86.1, 147.4) 38 (3, 72) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.1, 4.8)
Sharp County 6 *** 130.1 (98.0, 169.2) 8 (1, 70) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.0)
Clay County 6 *** 134.8 (101.3, 175.6) 5 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.4, 8.4)
Madison County 6 *** 113.2 (84.6, 148.2) 34 (2, 73) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.7, 4.3)
Drew County 6 *** 108.2 (80.6, 141.9) 50 (3, 74) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 3.9)
Grant County 6 *** 95.8 (71.5, 125.7) 63 (9, 74) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.3, 6.3)
Van Buren County 6 *** 123.5 (92.1, 162.2) 13 (2, 72) 10 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.1, 6.3)
Polk County 6 *** 91.0 (67.1, 120.4) 68 (10, 74) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.1, 3.6)
Little River County 6 *** 127.1 (92.6, 170.1) 9 (1, 72) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.9, 6.2)
Sevier County 6 *** 90.1 (65.6, 120.4) 69 (9, 74) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.3, 6.0)
Howard County 6 *** 116.2 (83.6, 156.9) 24 (2, 73) 8 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.5, 8.7)
Marion County 6 *** 112.7 (80.9, 152.8) 33 (2, 73) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.8, 5.3)
Pike County 6 *** 126.6 (89.8, 173.2) 10 (1, 73) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.6, 6.6)
Perry County 6 *** 118.0 (82.0, 164.5) 25 (1, 74) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.2)
Desha County 6 *** 111.3 (76.9, 155.2) 44 (2, 74) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.0, 4.8)
Fulton County 6 *** 107.1 (73.9, 150.3) 52 (2, 74) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.0, 6.6)
Izard County 6 *** 92.3 (63.7, 129.5) 66 (6, 74) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 2.9)
Bradley County 6 *** 100.1 (68.3, 141.3) 59 (3, 74) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.2)
Stone County 6 *** 109.9 (75.1, 155.1) 49 (2, 74) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 5.4)
Woodruff County 6 *** 186.6 (127.4, 263.4) 1 (1, 64) 6
*
*
Lincoln County 6 *** 64.1 (42.9, 92.3) 74 (42, 74) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.2, 4.8)
Cleveland County 6 *** 119.5 (78.6, 173.8) 22 (1, 74) 5
*
*
Montgomery County 6 *** 121.5 (78.9, 178.8) 17 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.8)
Chicot County 6 *** 85.5 (55.2, 126.2) 70 (7, 74) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.6, 7.4)
Dallas County 6 *** 130.3 (84.1, 192.2) 6 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.0, 2.5)
Lee County 6 *** 85.5 (55.2, 126.7) 71 (8, 74) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.8, 3.1)
Nevada County 6 *** 111.2 (71.7, 164.1) 45 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.1, 4.8)
Searcy County 6 *** 124.6 (80.4, 184.3) 12 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.5, 4.8)
Scott County 6 *** 81.8 (51.6, 122.7) 72 (7, 74) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.2, 2.7)
Monroe County 6 *** 122.2 (76.3, 185.0) 16 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Prairie County 6 *** 90.2 (53.9, 141.2) 65 (3, 74) 4
*
*
Calhoun County 6 *** 111.1 (62.8, 181.9) 46 (1, 74) 3
*
*
Newton County 6 *** 80.6 (45.9, 131.2) 73 (4, 74) 3 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 2.0)
Lafayette County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2022 12:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Lafayette

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top