Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 470.8 (467.3, 474.4) N/A 14,572 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) § 1 461.9 (461.6, 462.3) N/A 1,273,624 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
Yell County 6 453.0 (413.8, 495.3) 48 (12, 71) 109 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Woodruff County 6 601.9 (515.8, 699.6) 2 (1, 36) 41 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.5)
White County 6 495.1 (474.0, 516.8) 21 (9, 45) 441 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 2.2)
Washington County 6 429.4 (416.1, 443.0) 61 (47, 69) 828 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.1, -2.0)
Van Buren County 6 499.1 (458.7, 542.8) 18 (3, 59) 135 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.3)
Union County 6 471.3 (438.5, 506.0) 37 (11, 63) 170 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Stone County 6 418.7 (377.3, 464.2) 65 (26, 75) 92 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
St. Francis County 6 429.4 (384.0, 479.6) 60 (15, 74) 71 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.3, 14.2)
Sharp County 6 547.9 (505.2, 593.8) 7 (1, 32) 148 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.6)
Sevier County 6 366.9 (322.0, 417.0) 74 (51, 75) 53 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Sebastian County 6 477.6 (460.0, 495.7) 32 (16, 53) 605 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.0)
Searcy County 6 550.2 (488.1, 619.0) 5 (1, 49) 68 rising rising trend 6.7 (1.2, 13.4)
Scott County 6 472.4 (419.2, 531.3) 35 (4, 71) 64 rising rising trend 9.1 (1.0, 14.7)
Saline County 6 469.2 (452.9, 485.9) 39 (21, 54) 673 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Randolph County 6 525.5 (483.3, 570.6) 10 (2, 47) 125 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.6, 10.8)
Pulaski County 6 465.4 (454.1, 476.8) 41 (27, 54) 1,432 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Prairie County 6 457.3 (399.8, 521.9) 45 (5, 73) 52 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Pope County 6 472.8 (449.7, 497.0) 34 (15, 58) 332 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Polk County 6 442.7 (407.2, 480.9) 55 (17, 72) 131 stable stable trend 1.1 (-6.4, 7.2)
Poinsett County 6 548.2 (509.1, 589.7) 6 (1, 28) 156 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.0)
Pike County 6 431.9 (382.4, 486.7) 58 (13, 75) 61 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Phillips County 6 470.9 (410.5, 539.3) 38 (3, 73) 51 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.2)
Perry County 6 429.7 (380.4, 484.2) 59 (14, 75) 61 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Ouachita County 6 516.1 (470.0, 566.0) 13 (2, 54) 107 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.6, 14.3)
Newton County 6 408.0 (355.8, 467.0) 69 (19, 75) 53 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Nevada County 6 446.7 (382.2, 520.7) 52 (3, 75) 38 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Montgomery County 6 422.5 (371.7, 479.6) 64 (15, 75) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.3)
Monroe County 6 528.9 (445.2, 626.5) 9 (1, 69) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.3)
Mississippi County 6 503.8 (468.7, 541.0) 16 (4, 52) 163 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Miller County 6 415.1 (386.8, 445.1) 66 (38, 74) 170 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Marion County 6 445.1 (407.8, 485.5) 53 (15, 72) 136 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Madison County 6 408.1 (368.9, 450.7) 68 (35, 75) 87 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Lonoke County 6 503.1 (479.9, 527.2) 17 (7, 43) 365 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.1)
Logan County 6 498.1 (461.2, 537.4) 19 (4, 57) 147 rising rising trend 6.6 (0.5, 10.5)
Little River County 6 428.0 (379.3, 482.1) 62 (15, 75) 62 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.9)
Lincoln County 6 404.7 (354.3, 461.0) 71 (27, 75) 48 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 3.0)
Lee County 6 443.1 (368.1, 531.9) 54 (3, 75) 26 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.1)
Lawrence County 6 604.7 (557.6, 655.0) 1 (1, 11) 133 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.0, 12.4)
Lafayette County 6 448.8 (374.1, 536.8) 51 (3, 75) 31 rising rising trend 15.1 (2.2, 25.0)
Johnson County 6 487.5 (451.0, 526.4) 28 (6, 60) 143 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.3)
Jefferson County 6 563.7 (530.2, 599.1) 3 (1, 18) 242 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.5, 2.0)
Jackson County 6 486.2 (441.2, 535.1) 29 (4, 65) 92 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Izard County 6 407.3 (367.5, 451.0) 70 (34, 75) 90 stable stable trend 3.2 (-3.5, 7.4)
Independence County 6 456.6 (428.4, 486.3) 46 (18, 66) 209 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Howard County 6 370.8 (321.4, 426.3) 73 (47, 75) 46 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.8)
Hot Spring County 6 494.7 (463.2, 527.9) 22 (6, 54) 199 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.1, 9.2)
Hempstead County 6 392.3 (350.8, 437.9) 72 (41, 75) 75 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Greene County 6 493.4 (466.4, 521.6) 23 (7, 52) 260 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.4, 5.3)
Grant County 6 490.7 (450.2, 534.1) 25 (5, 62) 114 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.8)
Garland County 6 471.3 (453.9, 489.2) 36 (19, 56) 659 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Fulton County 6 462.2 (416.5, 512.1) 43 (7, 71) 92 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Franklin County 6 485.5 (444.4, 529.7) 30 (5, 63) 112 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Faulkner County 6 468.7 (450.6, 487.3) 40 (19, 57) 526 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.4, 6.1)
Drew County 6 554.7 (503.6, 610.1) 4 (1, 37) 94 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.1)
Desha County 6 497.0 (426.3, 577.4) 20 (1, 72) 42 stable stable trend 13.3 (-3.5, 27.6)
Dallas County 6 411.6 (341.5, 495.0) 67 (9, 75) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Cross County 6 539.6 (488.8, 594.6) 8 (1, 44) 89 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 3.1)
Crittenden County 6 440.5 (405.8, 477.5) 56 (20, 72) 129 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.7)
Crawford County 6 460.3 (437.8, 483.7) 44 (20, 62) 337 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.3)
Craighead County 6 491.0 (471.5, 511.0) 24 (11, 47) 504 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.3, 8.4)
Conway County 6 465.3 (426.7, 506.8) 42 (10, 68) 116 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Columbia County 6 356.7 (317.4, 399.8) 75 (61, 75) 68 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.4, -0.6)
Cleveland County 6 489.2 (428.0, 557.8) 27 (2, 70) 51 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Cleburne County 6 506.4 (472.9, 541.9) 15 (4, 50) 209 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Clay County 6 518.8 (474.4, 566.7) 11 (2, 52) 111 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.1)
Clark County 6 518.1 (471.2, 568.7) 12 (2, 53) 100 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.3)
Chicot County 6 425.4 (357.0, 506.1) 63 (7, 75) 32 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.5)
Carroll County 6 449.3 (416.8, 483.9) 50 (17, 70) 177 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.7)
Calhoun County 6 489.9 (408.5, 585.0) 26 (1, 74) 29 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 6.2)
Bradley County 6 455.3 (394.0, 524.8) 47 (4, 75) 44 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.5)
Boone County 6 474.9 (447.6, 503.6) 33 (13, 59) 248 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Benton County 6 439.3 (427.6, 451.3) 57 (43, 65) 1,101 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Baxter County 6 480.6 (455.9, 506.5) 31 (11, 55) 372 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Ashley County 6 450.2 (408.8, 495.0) 49 (13, 72) 97 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Arkansas County 6 514.8 (468.1, 565.5) 14 (2, 55) 98 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.5, 10.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/22/2024 7:53 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top