Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 2 N/A 36.5 (35.2, 37.7) N/A 718 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 68,084 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
Pulaski County 2 Urban 33.5 (30.3, 37.0) 43 (26, 53) 85 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Benton County 2 Urban 29.9 (26.2, 34.0) 52 (33, 57) 48 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.3)
Washington County 2 Urban 37.6 (32.8, 42.9) 31 (15, 49) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.1)
Sebastian County 2 Urban 38.0 (32.0, 44.8) 30 (12, 52) 30 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.3, 15.2)
Craighead County 2 Urban 40.2 (33.3, 48.1) 25 (7, 50) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.3)
Garland County 2 Urban 29.9 (24.5, 36.3) 51 (27, 58) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.8)
White County 2 Rural 45.4 (37.5, 54.7) 16 (4, 43) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Saline County 2 Urban 28.9 (23.7, 34.9) 54 (30, 59) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2)
Faulkner County 2 Urban 32.9 (27.0, 39.7) 45 (20, 57) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.9)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 48.6 (39.6, 59.2) 12 (2, 38) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Baxter County 2 Rural 40.1 (29.7, 53.4) 26 (4, 56) 14 stable stable trend 12.9 (-4.2, 38.5)
Crawford County 2 Urban 35.2 (27.1, 44.9) 39 (11, 58) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Pope County 2 Rural 32.9 (25.2, 42.4) 46 (14, 58) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.8)
Crittenden County 2 Urban 40.8 (31.1, 52.6) 24 (4, 54) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Union County 2 Rural 43.2 (32.3, 56.8) 21 (3, 53) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.5)
Independence County 2 Rural 45.4 (33.8, 59.7) 18 (1, 53) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.5)
Boone County 2 Rural 39.4 (29.1, 52.4) 27 (4, 57) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.8)
Greene County 2 Rural 36.4 (27.3, 47.8) 36 (8, 57) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
Lonoke County 2 Urban 26.4 (19.7, 34.5) 57 (28, 59) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.5)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 42.9 (31.6, 57.1) 23 (2, 55) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 1.9)
Miller County 2 Urban 31.0 (22.3, 42.1) 50 (15, 59) 9 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.1, -1.1)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 43.2 (29.9, 61.1) 22 (2, 57) 9 rising rising trend 24.7 (1.1, 41.7)
Ouachita County 2 Rural 49.5 (34.9, 68.8) 9 (1, 53) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.2)
Hot Spring County 2 Rural 37.4 (26.4, 52.0) 32 (4, 58) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.4)
Ashley County 2 Rural 55.4 (39.0, 77.3) 3 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.6, 8.8)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 65.3 (46.0, 91.0) 1 (1, 37) 8 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.6, 9.2)
Poinsett County 2 Urban 49.3 (34.7, 68.4) 10 (1, 53) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.5)
Carroll County 2 Rural 31.8 (22.2, 45.1) 48 (11, 59) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 3.0)
St. Francis County 2 Rural 48.1 (33.7, 67.4) 14 (1, 55) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.2, 3.6)
Arkansas County 2 Rural 49.9 (33.2, 72.7) 8 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.8, 7.2)
Columbia County 2 Rural 44.6 (29.6, 64.8) 19 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 4.9)
Grant County 2 Urban 49.1 (32.1, 72.5) 11 (1, 56) 6
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural 45.6 (29.3, 68.4) 15 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 3.6)
Johnson County 2 Rural 35.7 (23.1, 52.9) 37 (4, 59) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 2.8)
Hempstead County 2 Rural 38.3 (24.5, 57.6) 29 (2, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.5)
Phillips County 2 Rural 45.4 (28.6, 68.9) 17 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 1.9)
Sharp County 2 Rural 34.4 (21.1, 54.2) 42 (3, 59) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.3)
Yell County 2 Rural 34.6 (22.5, 51.9) 41 (5, 59) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.0, 1.0)
Conway County 2 Rural 31.8 (20.1, 48.7) 49 (7, 59) 5 stable stable trend 21.3 (-1.8, 42.2)
Polk County 2 Rural 31.8 (19.5, 50.0) 47 (6, 59) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.1, 0.0)
Clark County 2 Rural 35.7 (21.9, 55.3) 38 (2, 59) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 3.1)
Clay County 2 Rural 37.1 (22.9, 58.5) 33 (2, 59) 5 falling falling trend -30.9 (-52.3, -3.4)
Desha County 2 Rural 54.0 (33.7, 83.3) 4 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.1, 3.9)
Jackson County 2 Rural 38.5 (24.0, 59.6) 28 (2, 59) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.2)
Randolph County 2 Rural 36.4 (22.4, 56.5) 35 (2, 59) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.4, -1.0)
Stone County 2 Rural 43.2 (25.4, 70.7) 20 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.6, 5.5)
Cross County 2 Rural 37.1 (22.8, 57.8) 34 (2, 59) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 4.3)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 59.6 (34.9, 96.1) 2 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural 26.4 (15.6, 42.5) 56 (13, 59) 4
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural 53.9 (31.4, 87.6) 6 (1, 58) 4 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.2, 8.8)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 33.5 (19.1, 55.6) 44 (3, 59) 4
*
*
Marion County 2 Rural 23.9 (13.1, 41.8) 59 (16, 59) 4 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.9, 0.5)
Chicot County 2 Rural 53.6 (29.5, 90.3) 7 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.8, 5.9)
Drew County 2 Rural 29.2 (17.0, 47.7) 53 (7, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.1, 3.0)
Fulton County 2 Rural 26.3 (15.3, 45.9) 58 (11, 59) 3 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.4, 1.5)
Howard County 2 Rural 35.1 (20.3, 57.9) 40 (3, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.3, 2.8)
Izard County 2 Rural 27.2 (14.9, 48.3) 55 (7, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-7.2, 4.1)
Lee County 2 Rural 53.9 (28.1, 95.9) 5 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Nevada County 2 Rural 48.5 (26.7, 83.8) 13 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Bradley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleveland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Little River County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Searcy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sevier County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodruff County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/21/2026 7:29 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top