Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 N/A 22.4 (21.6, 23.1) N/A 797 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.9, 3.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) N/A 86,630 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
Arkansas County 6 Rural 21.4 (13.3, 32.9) 32 (2, 53) 5
*
*
Ashley County 6 Rural 20.2 (13.5, 29.6) 36 (4, 53) 6 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.3, 10.7)
Baxter County 6 Rural 18.7 (14.2, 24.6) 40 (14, 51) 15 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.7, 1.0)
Benton County 6 Urban 26.8 (24.2, 29.7) 11 (5, 28) 77 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.4, 7.1)
Boone County 6 Rural 15.9 (11.0, 22.3) 46 (19, 53) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.5, 4.0)
Carroll County 6 Rural 25.7 (18.5, 35.0) 16 (1, 47) 10 rising rising trend 5.9 (2.7, 10.4)
Clay County 6 Rural 15.3 (9.0, 25.2) 47 (15, 54) 4 stable stable trend 3.8 (-2.1, 11.1)
Cleburne County 6 Rural 30.0 (21.7, 40.6) 6 (1, 41) 11 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.1, 9.5)
Cleveland County 6 Rural 30.7 (16.9, 52.3) 5 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Columbia County 6 Rural 16.0 (9.3, 25.6) 45 (9, 54) 4
*
*
Conway County 6 Rural 26.7 (18.4, 37.6) 12 (1, 47) 7 rising rising trend 6.8 (0.7, 15.9)
Craighead County 6 Urban 25.4 (21.3, 30.0) 19 (4, 38) 29 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.7, 5.7)
Crawford County 6 Urban 28.3 (22.9, 34.6) 9 (1, 35) 20 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.2, 8.2)
Crittenden County 6 Urban 7.0 (4.1, 11.0) 54 (49, 54) 4
*
*
Cross County 6 Rural 25.9 (16.2, 39.2) 15 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend 2.4 (-4.0, 9.4)
Desha County 6 Rural 20.5 (11.4, 34.5) 34 (2, 54) 3 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.9, 10.9)
Drew County 6 Rural 24.9 (15.9, 37.2) 20 (1, 52) 5
*
*
Faulkner County 6 Urban 27.8 (23.7, 32.4) 10 (2, 31) 34 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.5, 7.7)
Franklin County 6 Rural 26.5 (17.3, 39.1) 13 (1, 51) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.2, 5.6)
Fulton County 6 Rural 37.1 (22.9, 56.9) 2 (1, 45) 6 stable stable trend 4.7 (-0.2, 10.4)
Garland County 6 Urban 18.9 (15.7, 22.7) 38 (19, 49) 28 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.6)
Grant County 6 Urban 18.4 (11.1, 28.9) 41 (5, 54) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.9, 6.2)
Greene County 6 Rural 22.3 (16.8, 29.1) 28 (4, 48) 11 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.5, 7.1)
Hempstead County 6 Rural 16.8 (10.1, 26.4) 43 (8, 54) 4
*
*
Hot Spring County 6 Rural 23.2 (17.1, 30.9) 26 (3, 49) 10 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.7, 10.7)
Independence County 6 Rural 23.1 (17.2, 30.4) 27 (3, 48) 11 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.1, 9.2)
Izard County 6 Rural 19.4 (11.4, 31.7) 37 (3, 54) 4
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural 20.3 (12.5, 31.5) 35 (3, 53) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural 16.0 (12.2, 20.6) 44 (26, 53) 13 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.1, 9.9)
Johnson County 6 Rural 24.2 (17.0, 33.6) 23 (2, 50) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.3, 6.3)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 25.7 (16.0, 39.1) 17 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend 4.8 (-0.5, 11.1)
Little River County 6 Urban 17.8 (9.9, 30.4) 42 (3, 54) 3
*
*
Logan County 6 Rural 24.7 (17.1, 34.9) 21 (1, 49) 7 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 8.0)
Lonoke County 6 Urban 29.6 (24.4, 35.6) 7 (1, 31) 24 rising rising trend 7.1 (5.4, 9.5)
Madison County 6 Urban 18.8 (11.5, 29.4) 39 (3, 53) 4
*
*
Marion County 6 Rural 14.8 (8.7, 24.5) 48 (14, 54) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-7.5, 7.9)
Miller County 6 Urban 13.1 (8.8, 18.8) 51 (31, 54) 6
*
*
Mississippi County 6 Rural 13.4 (8.9, 19.3) 50 (29, 54) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.2, 7.5)
Ouachita County 6 Rural 14.5 (8.6, 23.0) 49 (16, 54) 4
*
*
Perry County 6 Urban 37.1 (22.4, 58.2) 1 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Poinsett County 6 Urban 28.7 (20.2, 39.6) 8 (1, 45) 8 rising rising trend 7.2 (3.4, 12.7)
Polk County 6 Rural 13.0 (7.3, 21.8) 52 (21, 54) 3 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 4.9)
Pope County 6 Rural 23.4 (18.6, 29.1) 25 (6, 45) 17 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.3, 8.7)
Pulaski County 6 Urban 24.4 (22.4, 26.6) 22 (10, 33) 111 stable stable trend 0.9 (-6.6, 5.0)
Randolph County 6 Rural 22.1 (14.2, 33.0) 29 (2, 52) 5
*
*
Saline County 6 Urban 30.9 (26.9, 35.2) 4 (1, 21) 47 rising rising trend 5.8 (3.6, 8.9)
Searcy County 6 Rural 33.1 (19.2, 54.4) 3 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Sebastian County 6 Urban 23.8 (20.4, 27.7) 24 (8, 39) 36 stable stable trend 4.7 (-9.5, 16.2)
Sharp County 6 Rural 21.8 (13.8, 33.2) 31 (2, 53) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.3, 8.0)
Union County 6 Rural 12.0 (7.8, 17.6) 53 (34, 54) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.5, 3.5)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 25.5 (17.1, 37.4) 18 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.6, 11.3)
Washington County 6 Urban 22.0 (19.3, 25.0) 30 (14, 41) 50 falling falling trend -10.5 (-21.8, -0.4)
White County 6 Rural 26.2 (21.4, 31.7) 14 (2, 38) 22 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.5, 5.9)
Yell County 6 Rural 21.1 (13.4, 31.7) 33 (2, 53) 5 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.4, 8.3)
Bradley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chicot County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sevier County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Francis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodruff County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/12/2024 11:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bradley, Calhoun, Chicot, Clark, Dallas, Howard, Lafayette, Lee, Lincoln, Monroe, Montgomery, Nevada, Newton, Phillips, Pike, Prairie, Scott, Sevier, St. Francis, Stone, Woodruff

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top