Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 111.3 (109.2, 113.5) N/A 2,108 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.0, 7.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Clark County 6 171.2 (140.8, 206.8) 1 (1, 26) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.4, 4.5)
Desha County 6 162.9 (125.0, 210.4) 2 (1, 45) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.4)
Jefferson County 6 152.7 (136.5, 170.4) 3 (1, 21) 68 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Lee County 6 151.5 (111.0, 203.3) 4 (1, 60) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 6.6)
Chicot County 6 150.3 (112.9, 197.6) 5 (1, 55) 11 rising rising trend 10.8 (2.1, 40.4)
St. Francis County 6 146.8 (120.6, 177.2) 6 (1, 40) 23 stable stable trend 19.0 (-2.5, 46.2)
Woodruff County 6 143.3 (97.6, 205.9) 7 (1, 69) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.5, 1.3)
Garland County 6 142.9 (131.1, 155.6) 8 (2, 25) 114 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 9.0)
Phillips County 6 141.3 (110.9, 178.1) 9 (1, 52) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.2)
Cleveland County 6 141.0 (102.4, 192.2) 10 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.4, 2.2)
Crittenden County 6 141.0 (120.7, 163.8) 11 (1, 36) 37 rising rising trend 9.5 (4.7, 23.1)
Randolph County 6 139.2 (110.9, 173.2) 12 (1, 52) 17 rising rising trend 35.1 (5.1, 61.9)
Drew County 6 135.0 (105.8, 170.2) 13 (1, 57) 15 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.3, 0.7)
Ouachita County 6 134.6 (110.5, 163.0) 14 (1, 50) 23 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.7)
Pulaski County 6 130.8 (124.0, 137.8) 15 (8, 28) 298 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.6)
Bradley County 6 129.5 (94.3, 174.7) 16 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 3.7)
Poinsett County 6 129.2 (104.5, 158.6) 17 (1, 56) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 2.8)
Monroe County 6 128.8 (89.2, 183.9) 18 (1, 71) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.2, 2.6)
Mississippi County 6 127.6 (107.4, 150.6) 19 (2, 50) 30 rising rising trend 7.4 (0.3, 22.2)
Arkansas County 6 126.5 (99.6, 159.2) 20 (1, 61) 16 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.8, 0.7)
Union County 6 126.3 (107.3, 147.9) 21 (3, 51) 33 stable stable trend 13.0 (-7.3, 41.3)
Craighead County 6 125.9 (112.5, 140.4) 22 (6, 43) 67 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.4)
Hot Spring County 6 125.2 (105.6, 147.7) 23 (3, 53) 30 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 2.2)
Fulton County 6 124.3 (96.3, 160.3) 24 (1, 64) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.9)
Dallas County 6 124.3 (86.0, 177.1) 25 (1, 71) 7 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.5, -0.6)
Boone County 6 119.0 (101.5, 139.2) 26 (6, 53) 33 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -1.0)
Cross County 6 118.7 (90.7, 153.5) 27 (2, 66) 13 stable stable trend 11.9 (-0.9, 28.1)
Montgomery County 6 117.4 (86.6, 159.4) 28 (1, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.6)
Lawrence County 6 116.9 (89.8, 150.3) 29 (3, 67) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.2, 2.4)
Polk County 6 114.8 (92.7, 141.8) 30 (4, 65) 19 stable stable trend 2.7 (-15.5, 23.9)
Nevada County 6 114.4 (79.5, 161.8) 31 (1, 72) 7 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.5, 0.6)
Pike County 6 111.0 (81.1, 150.2) 32 (2, 71) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.3, 5.1)
Faulkner County 6 110.4 (98.6, 123.2) 33 (16, 55) 67 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Lonoke County 6 110.2 (95.7, 126.4) 34 (13, 59) 44 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -0.8)
Greene County 6 109.8 (92.4, 129.6) 35 (11, 62) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.5)
Ashley County 6 107.9 (85.4, 135.5) 36 (7, 69) 16 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.0, -0.8)
Pope County 6 106.2 (92.0, 122.1) 37 (16, 61) 41 rising rising trend 13.2 (5.6, 25.8)
Columbia County 6 106.1 (82.6, 134.7) 38 (7, 70) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.3)
Baxter County 6 105.8 (92.1, 121.8) 39 (17, 61) 46 stable stable trend 1.2 (-5.4, 16.2)
Grant County 6 105.4 (81.1, 135.6) 40 (6, 70) 13 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.6)
Benton County 6 105.0 (97.4, 113.0) 41 (26, 54) 146 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 6.1)
Calhoun County 6 105.0 (64.2, 167.0) 42 (1, 75) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 6.3)
Saline County 6 104.2 (94.3, 115.0) 43 (23, 57) 83 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.7, -2.9)
Lafayette County 6 103.9 (69.4, 154.0) 44 (1, 74) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.5, 2.9)
Carroll County 6 102.9 (85.3, 123.8) 45 (16, 68) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 11.6)
Cleburne County 6 102.7 (85.0, 124.1) 46 (13, 68) 24 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.9, -2.6)
Marion County 6 102.0 (81.9, 127.7) 47 (12, 70) 19 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.3, -0.1)
Searcy County 6 101.7 (70.5, 145.6) 48 (4, 74) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.0, 5.0)
Van Buren County 6 98.0 (76.8, 125.1) 49 (11, 72) 15 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.4, 0.1)
Izard County 6 97.0 (74.2, 126.8) 50 (11, 73) 12 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.2, -1.3)
Washington County 6 97.0 (88.8, 105.7) 51 (32, 62) 108 stable stable trend -4.2 (-16.9, 1.6)
Conway County 6 92.9 (72.2, 118.6) 52 (15, 73) 14 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.7, 0.5)
Sebastian County 6 91.4 (81.8, 101.8) 53 (36, 67) 70 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.6)
Clay County 6 91.0 (66.5, 122.5) 54 (13, 74) 10 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.4, 0.0)
White County 6 90.4 (78.4, 103.7) 55 (32, 70) 42 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.4, -2.2)
Crawford County 6 88.4 (75.7, 102.8) 56 (32, 70) 36 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -0.5)
Logan County 6 87.1 (68.2, 110.6) 57 (25, 73) 15 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -0.8)
Perry County 6 85.6 (58.6, 122.8) 58 (12, 75) 7 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.7, -1.3)
Jackson County 6 85.2 (62.5, 114.3) 59 (16, 74) 10 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.1, -0.9)
Newton County 6 85.2 (58.3, 124.9) 60 (13, 75) 7 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.8, 1.1)
Sharp County 6 84.4 (65.1, 109.3) 61 (24, 74) 13 rising rising trend 26.7 (8.2, 46.0)
Little River County 6 83.0 (58.6, 116.0) 62 (16, 75) 8 falling falling trend -4.3 (-15.0, -2.0)
Independence County 6 82.3 (66.7, 100.7) 63 (35, 73) 20 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.0, -1.8)
Lincoln County 6 80.1 (54.6, 114.0) 64 (20, 75) 7 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.8, -0.7)
Madison County 6 79.4 (57.8, 107.4) 65 (27, 75) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 1.3)
Yell County 6 77.6 (58.3, 101.7) 66 (30, 75) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.9)
Franklin County 6 77.5 (57.1, 103.8) 67 (30, 75) 10 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.2, 0.9)
Prairie County 6 77.0 (49.8, 116.8) 68 (17, 75) 5 falling falling trend -6.3 (-19.5, -3.0)
Stone County 6 74.5 (54.6, 102.2) 69 (31, 75) 9 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.3, -0.6)
Howard County 6 72.7 (48.3, 105.9) 70 (25, 75) 6 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.7, -3.2)
Hempstead County 6 72.1 (53.7, 95.6) 71 (39, 75) 11 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.5, -2.5)
Johnson County 6 66.4 (50.5, 86.2) 72 (48, 75) 12 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.7, -1.2)
Sevier County 6 61.7 (41.8, 88.4) 73 (45, 75) 6
*
*
Miller County 6 55.7 (43.9, 70.1) 74 (64, 75) 16 falling falling trend -6.9 (-10.1, -4.1)
Scott County 6 39.8 (22.5, 67.4) 75 (65, 75) 3
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 9:59 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top