Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 118.5 (116.2, 120.8) N/A 2,205 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 4.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 109.9 (109.7, 110.2) N/A 211,245 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 4.6)
Scott County 6 49.3 (29.9, 78.9) 75 (59, 75) 4
*
*
Miller County 6 59.3 (47.0, 74.2) 74 (64, 75) 16 falling falling trend -6.9 (-9.4, -4.3)
Johnson County 6 68.3 (51.7, 88.9) 73 (51, 75) 12 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.4, -1.3)
Sevier County 6 69.5 (48.3, 97.4) 72 (40, 75) 7
*
*
Howard County 6 78.2 (53.4, 111.5) 71 (27, 75) 7 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.4, -3.0)
Crawford County 6 82.1 (69.8, 96.1) 70 (44, 74) 33 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.2)
Sharp County 6 82.6 (63.5, 107.4) 69 (32, 75) 13 stable stable trend 14.9 (-15.4, 56.0)
Newton County 6 82.6 (56.3, 121.7) 68 (20, 75) 7 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.4, 0.9)
Madison County 6 84.6 (62.4, 113.1) 67 (26, 75) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.8)
Lafayette County 6 85.2 (54.9, 131.0) 66 (14, 75) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.2, 1.9)
Hempstead County 6 85.9 (65.7, 111.1) 65 (28, 75) 13 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.0, -2.7)
Perry County 6 86.2 (59.0, 123.5) 64 (18, 75) 7 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.2, -1.8)
Franklin County 6 87.7 (65.8, 115.5) 63 (23, 75) 11 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.4, 0.0)
Logan County 6 88.4 (68.9, 112.6) 62 (24, 74) 14 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.2)
Yell County 6 88.9 (68.0, 114.8) 61 (25, 75) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.6)
Little River County 6 91.7 (65.5, 126.5) 60 (16, 75) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.9, 0.1)
Sebastian County 6 92.0 (82.3, 102.6) 59 (40, 70) 68 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.7)
Prairie County 6 92.2 (62.1, 134.7) 58 (11, 75) 6 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.9, -0.8)
Stone County 6 92.3 (69.7, 122.5) 57 (18, 74) 11 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.0, -1.0)
Conway County 6 92.6 (71.7, 118.5) 56 (22, 74) 14 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.3)
Clay County 6 92.9 (67.9, 125.0) 55 (15, 74) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.2)
Jackson County 6 94.7 (70.6, 125.2) 54 (18, 74) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.0, -0.6)
Independence County 6 95.0 (77.9, 115.0) 53 (25, 72) 22 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.7, -2.1)
Lincoln County 6 95.5 (66.9, 132.6) 52 (12, 75) 8 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.3, -1.3)
Fulton County 6 97.5 (72.6, 130.5) 51 (15, 74) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.4)
Marion County 6 97.8 (78.1, 123.3) 50 (20, 72) 18 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -0.7)
Van Buren County 6 98.0 (76.8, 125.1) 49 (17, 73) 15 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.2, -0.7)
Izard County 6 99.2 (75.8, 129.6) 48 (14, 73) 12 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.7, -1.7)
White County 6 99.3 (86.7, 113.4) 47 (30, 68) 46 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.8, -2.7)
Baxter County 6 101.4 (87.9, 117.2) 46 (26, 67) 44 stable stable trend 1.2 (-6.4, 9.5)
Washington County 6 104.2 (95.5, 113.4) 45 (30, 60) 112 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.6)
Benton County 6 104.7 (96.9, 112.8) 44 (30, 58) 140 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.6, 5.9)
Greene County 6 106.0 (89.0, 125.6) 43 (18, 69) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.8)
Searcy County 6 106.8 (74.9, 151.4) 42 (4, 74) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.5, 3.6)
Carroll County 6 108.1 (89.7, 130.0) 41 (15, 68) 26 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.4, -0.6)
Pope County 6 109.3 (94.7, 125.5) 40 (19, 64) 42 rising rising trend 13.5 (2.7, 25.4)
Cleburne County 6 111.6 (93.1, 133.6) 39 (14, 67) 26 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.5, -2.9)
Pike County 6 113.2 (82.6, 153.2) 38 (4, 72) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.9, 3.3)
Ashley County 6 115.3 (92.2, 143.4) 37 (8, 68) 18 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.1)
Dallas County 6 116.7 (80.7, 166.8) 36 (2, 73) 7 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.2, -1.7)
Cross County 6 118.7 (90.4, 153.7) 35 (4, 70) 12 rising rising trend 12.6 (0.5, 26.2)
Lawrence County 6 119.4 (92.6, 152.4) 34 (5, 69) 14 stable stable trend -7.1 (-31.1, 25.2)
Saline County 6 119.5 (108.8, 131.1) 33 (16, 48) 93 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.9, -2.9)
Craighead County 6 120.5 (107.3, 134.8) 32 (13, 50) 63 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.7)
Montgomery County 6 121.5 (89.9, 164.2) 31 (2, 70) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.6)
Mississippi County 6 122.7 (103.0, 145.3) 30 (8, 58) 29 stable stable trend 7.6 (-0.2, 16.0)
Faulkner County 6 123.1 (110.4, 137.0) 29 (13, 48) 72 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Boone County 6 124.3 (106.2, 145.1) 28 (7, 55) 34 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.5)
Grant County 6 124.6 (97.4, 157.7) 27 (3, 66) 15 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.2)
Nevada County 6 124.9 (88.3, 173.9) 26 (1, 71) 8 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.8, -0.6)
Randolph County 6 125.3 (98.7, 157.7) 25 (3, 64) 16 rising rising trend 35.1 (0.7, 81.2)
Poinsett County 6 126.0 (101.2, 155.5) 24 (3, 62) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.6, 3.0)
Lonoke County 6 127.5 (111.5, 145.1) 23 (7, 48) 49 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.7)
Hot Spring County 6 128.1 (108.2, 150.9) 22 (6, 53) 31 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
Columbia County 6 128.4 (102.4, 159.5) 21 (3, 63) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.2)
Polk County 6 128.4 (104.5, 157.2) 20 (3, 59) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.5)
Calhoun County 6 133.1 (86.9, 199.9) 19 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.6, 5.9)
Arkansas County 6 137.9 (109.7, 171.9) 18 (1, 58) 17 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.7, 0.0)
Drew County 6 139.7 (109.8, 175.7) 17 (1, 57) 16 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.2, -0.2)
Crittenden County 6 141.9 (121.6, 164.7) 16 (3, 39) 38 rising rising trend 9.4 (3.5, 15.7)
Union County 6 144.5 (124.1, 167.5) 15 (1, 39) 38 stable stable trend 12.5 (-2.9, 30.3)
St. Francis County 6 147.9 (121.7, 178.3) 14 (1, 44) 24 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.1, 7.1)
Pulaski County 6 149.0 (141.7, 156.6) 13 (5, 21) 333 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.8)
Garland County 6 149.2 (137.1, 162.2) 12 (3, 26) 118 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 3.6)
Cleveland County 6 149.8 (109.6, 202.4) 11 (1, 63) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.3, 1.1)
Monroe County 6 151.2 (108.6, 208.6) 10 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.7)
Phillips County 6 152.1 (120.9, 189.4) 9 (1, 49) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.9)
Bradley County 6 152.1 (113.6, 200.6) 8 (1, 63) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.8)
Lee County 6 160.0 (118.4, 212.7) 7 (1, 56) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.8, 5.0)
Ouachita County 6 164.4 (137.4, 195.8) 6 (1, 31) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.4)
Jefferson County 6 164.6 (147.8, 183.0) 5 (1, 20) 74 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Woodruff County 6 165.8 (116.5, 231.9) 4 (1, 61) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.0, 0.9)
Desha County 6 166.1 (128.0, 213.6) 3 (1, 44) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.5)
Chicot County 6 166.7 (126.9, 216.3) 2 (1, 47) 12 rising rising trend 10.8 (1.4, 21.0)
Clark County 6 185.4 (153.4, 222.7) 1 (1, 21) 24 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2022 12:42 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top