Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 N/A 18.5 (17.9, 19.2) N/A 712 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 75,136 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.7)
Columbia County 6 Rural 10.8 (6.1, 18.0) 55 (24, 55) 3
*
*
Union County 6 Rural 13.5 (9.4, 19.0) 54 (18, 55) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.0, 5.5)
Mississippi County 6 Rural 13.8 (9.5, 19.6) 53 (18, 55) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.0, 5.7)
Crittenden County 6 Urban 14.8 (10.5, 20.3) 52 (16, 55) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.7, 8.9)
Arkansas County 6 Rural 15.2 (8.8, 24.7) 51 (5, 55) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.2)
Johnson County 6 Rural 15.4 (9.9, 23.0) 50 (7, 55) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.6, 4.0)
Conway County 6 Rural 15.4 (9.9, 23.5) 49 (7, 55) 5
*
*
Hempstead County 6 Rural 15.7 (9.7, 24.3) 48 (5, 55) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.5, 4.6)
Pulaski County 6 Urban 15.7 (14.1, 17.4) 47 (30, 52) 74 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Miller County 6 Urban 16.1 (11.7, 21.7) 46 (11, 55) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.4, 1.4)
Stone County 6 Rural 16.1 (9.2, 27.5) 45 (3, 55) 4
*
*
Ouachita County 6 Rural 16.3 (10.6, 24.3) 44 (6, 55) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.1)
Faulkner County 6 Urban 16.4 (13.3, 19.9) 43 (16, 54) 20 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.5)
Pope County 6 Rural 16.6 (12.8, 21.3) 42 (12, 54) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.5, 2.8)
Yell County 6 Rural 16.6 (10.3, 25.6) 41 (3, 55) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.8, 4.7)
Clay County 6 Rural 16.6 (10.1, 26.7) 40 (3, 55) 4 falling falling trend -18.7 (-52.5, -0.6)
Drew County 6 Rural 17.2 (10.4, 27.1) 39 (3, 55) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.6)
St. Francis County 6 Rural 17.3 (11.0, 26.1) 38 (3, 55) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-5.5, 8.5)
Phillips County 6 Rural 17.4 (10.4, 27.6) 37 (2, 55) 4
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural 17.5 (11.0, 27.1) 36 (3, 55) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.7, 3.7)
White County 6 Rural 17.7 (14.0, 22.1) 35 (10, 53) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Sharp County 6 Rural 17.8 (11.2, 27.4) 34 (2, 55) 5 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.5, -2.0)
Benton County 6 Urban 18.2 (16.1, 20.6) 33 (16, 48) 53 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 18.2 (14.4, 22.9) 32 (9, 53) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.4)
Crawford County 6 Urban 18.3 (14.1, 23.3) 31 (7, 53) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.6)
Polk County 6 Rural 18.7 (12.5, 27.4) 30 (3, 55) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.2, 5.3)
Washington County 6 Urban 18.7 (16.2, 21.5) 29 (12, 48) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
Cross County 6 Rural 19.4 (12.3, 29.7) 28 (1, 55) 5
*
*
Sebastian County 6 Urban 19.5 (16.5, 22.9) 27 (8, 48) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Fulton County 6 Rural 19.5 (12.5, 30.7) 26 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.9, 3.3)
Lonoke County 6 Urban 19.5 (15.4, 24.4) 25 (5, 51) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.3)
Independence County 6 Rural 20.0 (14.7, 26.7) 24 (3, 53) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 4.0)
Baxter County 6 Rural 20.0 (15.6, 25.6) 23 (4, 50) 18 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.1)
Hot Spring County 6 Rural 20.0 (14.3, 27.5) 22 (2, 54) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.5, 7.6)
Izard County 6 Rural 20.2 (12.4, 32.1) 21 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.5, 7.1)
Grant County 6 Urban 20.3 (13.2, 30.4) 20 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.5, 6.7)
Scott County 6 Rural 21.1 (12.3, 35.2) 19 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Poinsett County 6 Urban 21.2 (14.6, 30.2) 18 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.4)
Marion County 6 Rural 21.3 (14.7, 31.0) 17 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.3, 2.1)
Garland County 6 Urban 21.5 (18.4, 25.0) 16 (5, 40) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
Boone County 6 Rural 22.1 (16.8, 28.8) 15 (1, 49) 12 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.4, 1.5)
Craighead County 6 Urban 22.2 (18.5, 26.4) 14 (3, 41) 26 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.6)
Clark County 6 Rural 22.8 (15.2, 33.3) 13 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.8, 6.4)
Greene County 6 Rural 23.2 (17.9, 29.7) 12 (1, 44) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.1, 5.6)
Saline County 6 Urban 23.7 (20.4, 27.5) 11 (2, 31) 38 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.7)
Searcy County 6 Rural 24.2 (14.2, 41.1) 10 (1, 55) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.2, 5.1)
Logan County 6 Rural 24.2 (17.0, 33.9) 9 (1, 51) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.3)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 24.5 (14.7, 39.0) 8 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Van Buren County 6 Rural 25.1 (17.8, 35.5) 7 (1, 51) 8 rising rising trend 21.3 (5.2, 47.4)
Jackson County 6 Rural 25.4 (16.9, 37.2) 6 (1, 53) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.8, 2.0)
Cleburne County 6 Rural 25.9 (19.6, 34.2) 5 (1, 40) 12 stable stable trend -5.7 (-19.5, 1.9)
Madison County 6 Urban 25.9 (17.4, 37.7) 4 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-5.4, 8.2)
Randolph County 6 Rural 27.0 (18.8, 38.0) 3 (1, 49) 7
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural 28.4 (21.5, 37.1) 2 (1, 33) 13 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.5, 7.0)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 30.9 (21.1, 44.0) 1 (1, 44) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.1, 6.2)
Ashley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bradley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chicot County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleveland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Desha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Little River County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sevier County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodruff County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 9:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top