Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 6 N/A 21.2 (20.5, 21.9) N/A 773 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) N/A 67,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Benton County 6 Urban 20.2 (17.9, 22.7) 41 (23, 50) 60 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.6, 7.6)
Craighead County 6 Urban 32.2 (27.6, 37.4) 2 (1, 23) 36 rising rising trend 6.3 (4.1, 9.4)
Crawford County 6 Urban 26.0 (20.8, 32.1) 20 (2, 45) 19 rising rising trend 5.3 (3.4, 7.7)
Crittenden County 6 Urban 24.5 (18.9, 31.3) 26 (3, 52) 14 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.3, 7.3)
Faulkner County 6 Urban 21.8 (18.3, 25.8) 33 (13, 52) 28 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.6, 5.1)
Garland County 6 Urban 20.4 (17.1, 24.3) 38 (17, 54) 30 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.3)
Little River County 6 Urban 27.4 (16.5, 43.2) 14 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Lonoke County 6 Urban 27.4 (22.6, 33.0) 13 (1, 41) 23 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 6.6)
Madison County 6 Urban 13.9 (7.9, 23.1) 56 (19, 58) 3
*
*
Miller County 6 Urban 23.1 (17.4, 30.0) 28 (4, 54) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 5.9)
Poinsett County 6 Urban 26.8 (18.7, 37.3) 17 (1, 54) 8 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.8, 8.7)
Pulaski County 6 Urban 17.3 (15.6, 19.1) 52 (36, 55) 82 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.3)
Saline County 6 Urban 18.4 (15.4, 21.8) 46 (25, 56) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.7)
Sebastian County 6 Urban 21.2 (17.9, 24.8) 35 (16, 52) 33 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.7)
Washington County 6 Urban 17.9 (15.5, 20.5) 49 (31, 55) 41 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.7)
Arkansas County 6 Rural 24.6 (16.1, 36.5) 25 (1, 57) 6 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.3, 7.0)
Ashley County 6 Rural 26.7 (18.5, 37.6) 19 (1, 54) 7 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.6, 10.1)
Baxter County 6 Rural 17.5 (12.9, 23.5) 51 (17, 58) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.0)
Boone County 6 Rural 13.7 (9.4, 19.5) 57 (32, 58) 7 falling falling trend -4.2 (-25.6, -0.2)
Bradley County 6 Rural 20.9 (11.8, 35.2) 36 (1, 58) 3
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural 15.9 (10.4, 23.3) 54 (18, 58) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.2, 5.3)
Clark County 6 Rural 27.6 (18.2, 40.1) 12 (1, 55) 6
*
*
Clay County 6 Rural 32.2 (21.2, 47.1) 3 (1, 53) 6
*
*
Cleburne County 6 Rural 27.8 (19.6, 38.5) 11 (1, 52) 10 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.4, 11.2)
Columbia County 6 Rural 17.8 (11.7, 26.4) 50 (8, 58) 5
*
*
Conway County 6 Rural 18.0 (11.7, 26.9) 48 (8, 58) 5
*
*
Cross County 6 Rural 14.6 (8.4, 24.0) 55 (16, 58) 3 stable stable trend -29.4 (-57.2, 2.0)
Desha County 6 Rural 22.8 (13.2, 37.2) 29 (1, 58) 4 rising rising trend 6.6 (2.0, 12.7)
Drew County 6 Rural 28.5 (19.1, 41.2) 6 (1, 54) 6
*
*
Franklin County 6 Rural 26.7 (17.7, 39.0) 18 (1, 56) 6
*
*
Fulton County 6 Rural 25.5 (14.6, 41.7) 21 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Greene County 6 Rural 23.5 (17.9, 30.3) 27 (4, 54) 12 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.8, 5.8)
Hempstead County 6 Rural 20.4 (13.1, 30.4) 39 (3, 58) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.0, 4.1)
Hot Spring County 6 Rural 27.8 (20.7, 36.7) 9 (1, 49) 11 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.3, 9.1)
Howard County 6 Rural 28.9 (18.2, 43.9) 5 (1, 56) 5
*
*
Independence County 6 Rural 27.2 (20.5, 35.4) 15 (1, 49) 12 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.0, 9.8)
Izard County 6 Rural 18.8 (11.3, 30.4) 45 (5, 58) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.9, 3.5)
Jackson County 6 Rural 20.1 (12.1, 31.7) 42 (2, 58) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.8, 4.7)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 25.0 (20.2, 30.5) 23 (4, 48) 21 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 7.4)
Johnson County 6 Rural 22.6 (15.3, 32.3) 30 (2, 57) 6
*
*
Lawrence County 6 Rural 22.0 (14.0, 33.3) 32 (2, 58) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.6, 6.4)
Lee County 6 Rural 25.3 (14.1, 42.8) 22 (1, 58) 3
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural 24.8 (14.6, 39.8) 24 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Logan County 6 Rural 22.6 (15.4, 32.3) 31 (2, 57) 7 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.7, 8.2)
Marion County 6 Rural 10.5 (6.1, 18.2) 58 (42, 58) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-9.1, 4.9)
Mississippi County 6 Rural 31.7 (24.6, 40.3) 4 (1, 37) 14 rising rising trend 5.9 (2.4, 10.4)
Ouachita County 6 Rural 28.0 (19.7, 38.8) 8 (1, 53) 8 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.8, 8.3)
Phillips County 6 Rural 16.8 (10.1, 26.7) 53 (9, 58) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.5, 7.2)
Polk County 6 Rural 20.9 (13.6, 31.2) 37 (3, 58) 6
*
*
Pope County 6 Rural 19.5 (15.0, 24.9) 43 (13, 56) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.9)
Randolph County 6 Rural 37.2 (26.1, 51.5) 1 (1, 38) 8 rising rising trend 7.2 (2.8, 13.6)
Sevier County 6 Rural 20.3 (11.9, 32.4) 40 (2, 58) 4
*
*
Sharp County 6 Rural 21.7 (14.0, 32.7) 34 (2, 57) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.9, 6.5)
St. Francis County 6 Rural 18.2 (11.9, 27.0) 47 (8, 58) 5 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.5, 8.8)
Union County 6 Rural 27.8 (21.5, 35.6) 10 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.2, 7.5)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 28.3 (18.2, 42.2) 7 (1, 57) 6 rising rising trend 6.9 (1.3, 14.2)
White County 6 Rural 19.4 (15.5, 23.9) 44 (17, 56) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.8)
Yell County 6 Rural 26.9 (18.2, 38.3) 16 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (-3.0, 8.9)
Calhoun County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chicot County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleveland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Searcy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodruff County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/11/2024 12:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Calhoun, Chicot, Cleveland, Dallas, Grant, Lafayette, Monroe, Montgomery, Nevada, Newton, Perry, Pike, Prairie, Scott, Searcy, Stone, Woodruff

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top