Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 7 *** 402.4 (401.6, 403.3) N/A 171,164 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 448.6 (448.3, 448.9) N/A 1,703,249 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Glenn County 7 *** 493.9 (459.7, 530.1) 1 (1, 11) 161 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Shasta County 7 *** 490.3 (477.6, 503.4) 2 (1, 5) 1,230 stable stable trend -4.2 (-9.4, 1.4)
Tehama County 7 *** 479.4 (458.3, 501.4) 3 (1, 10) 414 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Butte County 7 *** 471.1 (459.4, 483.0) 4 (1, 8) 1,353 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Yuba County 7 *** 456.8 (434.6, 479.8) 5 (1, 22) 338 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Placer County 7 *** 452.7 (444.2, 461.3) 6 (4, 13) 2,305 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.1, 0.1)
Marin County 7 *** 451.4 (441.5, 461.5) 7 (4, 14) 1,738 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Lake County 7 *** 451.2 (431.1, 472.0) 8 (2, 23) 437 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Amador County 7 *** 444.1 (419.9, 469.5) 9 (2, 32) 295 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
San Luis Obispo County 7 *** 442.7 (432.8, 452.8) 10 (5, 18) 1,675 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.5)
Santa Barbara County 7 *** 438.4 (430.0, 447.0) 11 (6, 20) 2,143 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
El Dorado County 7 *** 434.5 (422.8, 446.4) 12 (6, 26) 1,173 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Inyo County 7 *** 433.3 (396.4, 472.9) 13 (2, 51) 119 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Mendocino County 7 *** 432.1 (414.9, 450.0) 14 (5, 33) 535 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Sonoma County 7 *** 429.7 (422.4, 437.1) 15 (10, 25) 2,879 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Santa Cruz County 7 *** 428.6 (418.0, 439.3) 16 (9, 29) 1,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Solano County 7 *** 428.5 (420.2, 436.8) 17 (10, 27) 2,186 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Humboldt County 7 *** 427.7 (413.3, 442.6) 18 (7, 33) 726 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Trinity County 7 *** 426.8 (384.4, 473.3) 19 (1, 54) 93 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Sacramento County 7 *** 425.9 (421.3, 430.5) 20 (12, 26) 6,947 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Napa County 7 *** 421.6 (408.1, 435.5) 21 (10, 36) 781 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.1, -2.1)
Ventura County 7 *** 421.6 (415.7, 427.6) 22 (14, 30) 4,099 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Stanislaus County 7 *** 420.6 (412.8, 428.5) 23 (14, 32) 2,304 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Plumas County 7 *** 419.9 (384.9, 457.8) 24 (3, 54) 137 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Contra Costa County 7 *** 419.7 (414.7, 424.7) 25 (16, 30) 5,594 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.4)
San Diego County 7 *** 418.6 (415.6, 421.7) 26 (19, 30) 14,754 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
San Joaquin County 7 *** 413.4 (406.8, 420.2) 27 (19, 35) 3,046 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
San Mateo County 7 *** 412.3 (406.3, 418.3) 28 (21, 36) 3,780 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Nevada County 7 *** 411.9 (396.9, 427.4) 29 (13, 45) 688 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.7, 8.0)
Orange County 7 *** 410.4 (407.4, 413.5) 30 (25, 35) 14,489 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.7)
Tuolumne County 7 *** 408.0 (388.1, 428.8) 31 (12, 51) 370 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.6, -2.5)
Kern County 7 *** 406.7 (400.2, 413.1) 32 (25, 40) 3,211 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Calaveras County 7 *** 406.1 (384.4, 429.0) 33 (11, 53) 321 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Riverside County 7 *** 403.2 (399.7, 406.7) 34 (29, 40) 10,349 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.8)
Yolo County 7 *** 400.1 (387.7, 412.8) 35 (23, 49) 819 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
San Bernardino County 7 *** 399.9 (396.0, 404.0) 36 (31, 43) 8,092 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Sutter County 7 *** 398.3 (381.5, 415.7) 37 (19, 53) 434 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
San Benito County 7 *** 395.4 (372.8, 418.9) 38 (14, 55) 242 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
San Francisco County 7 *** 394.5 (388.9, 400.1) 39 (33, 47) 4,033 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Fresno County 7 *** 392.9 (387.1, 398.7) 40 (34, 48) 3,651 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Madera County 7 *** 392.1 (378.3, 406.3) 41 (27, 53) 630 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Imperial County 7 *** 391.3 (378.2, 404.8) 42 (29, 53) 691 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Monterey County 7 *** 390.8 (382.4, 399.3) 43 (33, 51) 1,723 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Alpine County 7 *** 386.4 (242.1, 593.3) 44 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.2, 8.3)
Alameda County 7 *** 385.9 (381.8, 390.1) 45 (39, 51) 6,892 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Lassen County 7 *** 384.9 (355.3, 416.5) 46 (14, 57) 132 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Santa Clara County 7 *** 382.7 (378.9, 386.6) 47 (42, 52) 7,808 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Del Norte County 7 *** 382.7 (353.5, 413.7) 48 (17, 57) 136 falling falling trend -12.3 (-22.0, -1.4)
Merced County 7 *** 380.5 (369.5, 391.8) 49 (37, 55) 925 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Los Angeles County 7 *** 377.3 (375.6, 379.0) 50 (46, 54) 40,309 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Colusa County 7 *** 377.2 (341.8, 415.2) 51 (14, 57) 88 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Kings County 7 *** 374.7 (359.6, 390.2) 52 (37, 57) 483 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Mariposa County 7 *** 372.1 (339.7, 407.4) 53 (19, 57) 116 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Tulare County 7 *** 370.2 (361.9, 378.7) 54 (46, 56) 1,540 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Modoc County 7 *** 357.8 (311.4, 410.1) 55 (13, 58) 52 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Siskiyou County 7 *** 354.5 (333.4, 376.7) 56 (43, 57) 250 falling falling trend -9.4 (-14.5, -4.1)
Sierra County 7 *** 319.9 (245.0, 414.5) 57 (6, 58) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.0)
Mono County 7 *** 290.9 (254.3, 331.6) 58 (55, 58) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/26/2022 9:46 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top