Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 7,8 *** 92.8 (92.3, 93.3) 23,694 rising rising trend 0.2 (0.1, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,8 *** 105.4 (105.2, 105.6) 208,732 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
Los Angeles County 7,8 *** 89.9 (88.9, 90.9) 6,162 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.4)
Orange County 7,8 *** 95.5 (93.6, 97.4) 2,016 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
San Diego County 7,8 *** 94.0 (92.1, 95.9) 2,011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Riverside County 7,8 *** 86.6 (84.5, 88.7) 1,295 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.3)
San Bernardino County 7,8 *** 91.2 (88.9, 93.5) 1,250 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.7)
Santa Clara County 7,8 *** 92.2 (89.9, 94.5) 1,232 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7)
Alameda County 7,8 *** 89.3 (86.8, 91.8) 1,009 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Sacramento County 7,8 *** 98.4 (95.6, 101.3) 949 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
Contra Costa County 7,8 *** 98.5 (95.3, 101.8) 726 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
San Francisco County 7,8 *** 99.0 (95.4, 102.6) 639 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Fresno County 7,8 *** 91.7 (88.3, 95.3) 550 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 0.8)
Ventura County 7,8 *** 98.0 (94.2, 101.8) 527 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
San Mateo County 7,8 *** 99.3 (95.5, 103.2) 515 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Kern County 7,8 *** 88.7 (85.1, 92.3) 492 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
San Joaquin County 7,8 *** 90.3 (86.4, 94.3) 416 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.2)
Stanislaus County 7,8 *** 97.9 (93.2, 102.8) 329 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.6)
Sonoma County 7,8 *** 95.6 (90.7, 100.6) 290 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
Solano County 7,8 *** 97.0 (91.8, 102.5) 264 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Santa Barbara County 7,8 *** 99.5 (94.0, 105.2) 256 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.4)
Placer County 7,8 *** 110.3 (104.3, 116.6) 255 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.6, 1.6)
Tulare County 7,8 *** 88.7 (83.7, 93.8) 250 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
Monterey County 7,8 *** 87.0 (82.1, 92.1) 240 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Marin County 7,8 *** 107.4 (100.2, 114.9) 175 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.8)
Santa Cruz County 7,8 *** 103.3 (96.4, 110.6) 170 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
San Luis Obispo County 7,8 *** 97.0 (90.0, 104.3) 148 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Merced County 7,8 *** 84.6 (78.3, 91.1) 140 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Butte County 7,8 *** 103.1 (95.1, 111.6) 126 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Shasta County 7,8 *** 117.5 (108.1, 127.6) 116 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 2.0)
Yolo County 7,8 *** 91.4 (83.9, 99.3) 115 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Imperial County 7,8 *** 99.9 (91.7, 108.7) 111 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.7)
El Dorado County 7,8 *** 99.4 (91.0, 108.4) 105 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Madera County 7,8 *** 91.3 (82.9, 100.3) 88 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Kings County 7,8 *** 82.2 (74.4, 90.6) 84 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.7)
Napa County 7,8 *** 91.8 (83.0, 101.3) 80 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Humboldt County 7,8 *** 91.6 (82.3, 101.6) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Sutter County 7,8 *** 91.9 (81.2, 103.7) 53 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Mendocino County 7,8 *** 104.5 (92.0, 118.0) 51 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.2)
Nevada County 7,8 *** 94.4 (82.7, 107.2) 48 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Yuba County 7,8 *** 99.0 (86.1, 113.2) 44 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Lake County 7,8 *** 107.2 (92.1, 124.1) 36 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
Tehama County 7,8 *** 100.9 (86.6, 116.9) 36 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
San Benito County 7,8 *** 88.9 (75.8, 103.5) 33 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.3)
Tuolumne County 7,8 *** 89.3 (74.4, 106.4) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Calaveras County 7,8 *** 99.9 (81.8, 120.8) 22 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Amador County 7,8 *** 99.1 (80.4, 120.9) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.8)
Lassen County 7,8 *** 79.6 (63.6, 98.6) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.8)
Siskiyou County 7,8 *** 77.2 (61.4, 95.8) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.8)
Glenn County 7,8 *** 94.1 (74.0, 117.7) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.3)
Del Norte County 7,8 *** 80.6 (62.6, 102.1) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.0)
Colusa County 7,8 *** 107.1 (83.0, 135.8) 14 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.1, 6.3)
Inyo County 7,8 *** 113.2 (84.9, 147.7) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.3, 5.4)
Plumas County 7,8 *** 106.1 (77.8, 141.3) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.3)
Trinity County 7,8 *** 111.0 (77.2, 154.7) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.1, 6.1)
Mariposa County 7,8 *** 78.6 (54.2, 110.3) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.5, 2.0)
Modoc County 7,8 *** 97.8 (61.8, 147.1) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.5, 3.6)
Mono County 7,8 *** 44.1 (26.8, 68.5) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 2.9)
Alpine County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/30/2020 9:22 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2019 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top