Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 7 *** 93.5 (93.0, 94.1) N/A 23,875 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.1 (105.9, 106.3) N/A 209,535 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Alameda County 7 *** 89.1 (86.7, 91.6) 46 (32, 50) 1,017 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
Amador County 7 *** 93.2 (75.3, 114.1) 32 (2, 55) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Butte County 7 *** 107.0 (98.9, 115.7) 7 (1, 30) 130 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.7)
Calaveras County 7 *** 94.4 (76.9, 114.6) 31 (1, 55) 21 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.1)
Colusa County 7 *** 101.7 (78.1, 129.9) 12 (1, 55) 13 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.3, 5.5)
Contra Costa County 7 *** 99.2 (96.0, 102.5) 18 (9, 33) 733 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.4)
Del Norte County 7 *** 72.4 (55.3, 93.2) 54 (14, 56) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 1.9)
El Dorado County 7 *** 100.6 (92.2, 109.7) 14 (3, 47) 106 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Fresno County 7 *** 92.1 (88.7, 95.7) 38 (22, 49) 555 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
Glenn County 7 *** 91.9 (72.0, 115.5) 40 (1, 55) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.0)
Humboldt County 7 *** 93.0 (83.7, 103.0) 33 (7, 53) 75 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Imperial County 7 *** 101.0 (92.6, 109.8) 13 (3, 46) 112 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.6, 2.5)
Inyo County 7 *** 120.6 (91.2, 156.3) 1 (1, 53) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.2, 5.3)
Kern County 7 *** 92.0 (88.4, 95.7) 39 (21, 49) 510 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Kings County 7 *** 86.8 (78.8, 95.4) 49 (16, 54) 88 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Lake County 7 *** 112.5 (97.1, 129.7) 5 (1, 44) 39 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 2.6)
Lassen County 7 *** 74.1 (58.7, 92.5) 53 (15, 56) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Los Angeles County 7 *** 90.6 (89.6, 91.6) 43 (32, 47) 6,178 rising rising trend 0.2 (0.1, 0.4)
Madera County 7 *** 92.7 (84.3, 101.7) 36 (9, 52) 90 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Marin County 7 *** 109.7 (102.4, 117.4) 6 (1, 21) 175 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.8)
Mariposa County 7 *** 75.8 (52.0, 106.9) 52 (2, 56) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.4)
Mendocino County 7 *** 102.2 (89.9, 115.6) 11 (1, 50) 50 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Merced County 7 *** 84.7 (78.5, 91.3) 51 (29, 54) 142 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Modoc County 7 *** 98.3 (61.5, 148.9) 23 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 2.8)
Mono County 7 *** 53.1 (33.9, 79.3) 56 (39, 56) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 2.9)
Monterey County 7 *** 90.8 (85.8, 96.1) 42 (18, 52) 250 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.5, 1.6)
Napa County 7 *** 95.3 (86.3, 105.0) 29 (5, 51) 82 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Nevada County 7 *** 100.2 (88.2, 113.4) 15 (2, 51) 51 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.3)
Orange County 7 *** 97.2 (95.3, 99.1) 25 (14, 34) 2,038 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.5)
Placer County 7 *** 106.4 (100.6, 112.6) 9 (2, 24) 248 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.9, 1.4)
Plumas County 7 *** 113.4 (83.8, 150.0) 4 (1, 55) 10 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 3.8)
Riverside County 7 *** 88.3 (86.2, 90.5) 47 (35, 51) 1,330 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.4)
Sacramento County 7 *** 97.5 (94.7, 100.3) 24 (12, 35) 946 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
San Benito County 7 *** 85.7 (73.0, 99.9) 50 (7, 55) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
San Bernardino County 7 *** 91.7 (89.5, 94.0) 41 (26, 46) 1,261 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
San Diego County 7 *** 94.5 (92.6, 96.3) 30 (20, 40) 2,028 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.2)
San Francisco County 7 *** 99.1 (95.5, 102.7) 19 (8, 33) 641 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
San Joaquin County 7 *** 92.8 (88.9, 96.9) 34 (18, 48) 431 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.2)
San Luis Obispo County 7 *** 95.7 (88.8, 103.0) 28 (8, 51) 146 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
San Mateo County 7 *** 100.1 (96.3, 104.1) 17 (8, 33) 519 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.4)
Santa Barbara County 7 *** 100.2 (94.7, 105.9) 16 (6, 36) 258 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Santa Clara County 7 *** 92.7 (90.4, 95.1) 35 (24, 45) 1,239 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.7)
Santa Cruz County 7 *** 104.4 (97.4, 111.7) 10 (2, 32) 170 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Shasta County 7 *** 114.6 (105.3, 124.6) 3 (1, 18) 113 stable stable trend -6.1 (-15.3, 4.1)
Siskiyou County 7 *** 69.3 (54.4, 87.0) 55 (27, 56) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Solano County 7 *** 95.9 (90.7, 101.3) 27 (10, 46) 261 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
Sonoma County 7 *** 96.1 (91.2, 101.2) 26 (10, 45) 290 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 0.9)
Stanislaus County 7 *** 98.5 (93.8, 103.4) 21 (8, 40) 332 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.6)
Sutter County 7 *** 89.4 (78.8, 101.0) 45 (8, 54) 52 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.8)
Tehama County 7 *** 98.8 (84.6, 114.6) 20 (1, 53) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Trinity County 7 *** 119.2 (83.8, 164.5) 2 (1, 55) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.1, 5.1)
Tulare County 7 *** 87.5 (82.7, 92.6) 48 (26, 53) 249 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
Tuolumne County 7 *** 90.0 (75.0, 107.3) 44 (3, 55) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Ventura County 7 *** 98.4 (94.7, 102.3) 22 (9, 37) 525 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9)
Yolo County 7 *** 92.6 (85.1, 100.6) 37 (10, 52) 116 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Yuba County 7 *** 107.0 (93.7, 121.7) 8 (1, 49) 48 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.5, 4.5)
Alpine County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/08/2022 3:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alpine, Sierra

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top