Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 7 *** 1,810.1 (1,804.9, 1,815.4) N/A 94,301 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 1,975.9 (1,974.1, 1,977.7) N/A 952,920 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Glenn County 7 *** 2,401.6 (2,193.8, 2,623.6) 1 (1, 6) 99 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Shasta County 7 *** 2,242.9 (2,172.1, 2,315.5) 2 (1, 4) 776 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Tehama County 7 *** 2,241.0 (2,120.3, 2,366.7) 3 (1, 7) 262 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Butte County 7 *** 2,092.1 (2,027.6, 2,158.0) 4 (3, 11) 824 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Placer County 7 *** 2,075.5 (2,027.4, 2,124.3) 5 (3, 10) 1,442 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Yuba County 7 *** 2,052.6 (1,917.9, 2,194.3) 6 (2, 30) 181 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
San Luis Obispo County 7 *** 2,052.2 (1,996.4, 2,109.2) 7 (3, 13) 1,059 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.5)
Marin County 7 *** 2,035.9 (1,980.9, 2,092.0) 8 (4, 14) 1,078 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Amador County 7 *** 2,034.5 (1,906.3, 2,169.0) 9 (2, 30) 194 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Santa Barbara County 7 *** 1,982.6 (1,933.5, 2,032.7) 10 (6, 21) 1,271 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
El Dorado County 7 *** 1,965.2 (1,899.0, 2,033.2) 11 (5, 28) 695 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Sonoma County 7 *** 1,953.3 (1,911.2, 1,996.2) 12 (8, 23) 1,722 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Napa County 7 *** 1,946.8 (1,869.0, 2,026.9) 13 (6, 32) 484 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.0, -2.7)
Solano County 7 *** 1,925.6 (1,876.2, 1,975.9) 14 (9, 29) 1,200 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Ventura County 7 *** 1,917.1 (1,881.9, 1,952.8) 15 (10, 27) 2,313 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Sacramento County 7 *** 1,912.7 (1,885.1, 1,940.6) 16 (12, 27) 3,783 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Lake County 7 *** 1,910.3 (1,806.3, 2,018.9) 17 (6, 42) 262 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
San Diego County 7 *** 1,908.0 (1,889.3, 1,926.8) 18 (13, 26) 8,224 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Contra Costa County 7 *** 1,902.0 (1,871.9, 1,932.4) 19 (12, 29) 3,150 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.8)
Calaveras County 7 *** 1,897.8 (1,784.7, 2,016.2) 20 (5, 44) 218 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Santa Cruz County 7 *** 1,896.5 (1,834.1, 1,960.5) 21 (9, 36) 753 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Mendocino County 7 *** 1,890.2 (1,795.8, 1,988.2) 22 (8, 42) 324 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.4)
Tuolumne County 7 *** 1,883.8 (1,778.9, 1,993.3) 23 (7, 44) 246 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.2, -2.8)
Orange County 7 *** 1,874.0 (1,855.6, 1,892.5) 24 (18, 31) 8,110 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
Stanislaus County 7 *** 1,873.8 (1,826.9, 1,921.6) 25 (13, 36) 1,242 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Humboldt County 7 *** 1,867.8 (1,785.4, 1,953.0) 26 (9, 41) 412 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
San Mateo County 7 *** 1,849.9 (1,814.5, 1,885.8) 27 (18, 37) 2,140 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
San Joaquin County 7 *** 1,845.7 (1,805.2, 1,886.9) 28 (18, 38) 1,626 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Lassen County 7 *** 1,839.4 (1,652.8, 2,041.2) 29 (4, 54) 75 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.0)
Kern County 7 *** 1,832.2 (1,792.2, 1,872.9) 30 (20, 39) 1,642 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Riverside County 7 *** 1,831.2 (1,810.3, 1,852.3) 31 (24, 37) 5,926 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.2)
Plumas County 7 *** 1,821.6 (1,651.7, 2,004.5) 32 (4, 54) 89 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
San Benito County 7 *** 1,809.1 (1,668.8, 1,958.0) 33 (8, 54) 128 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Nevada County 7 *** 1,797.4 (1,720.9, 1,876.4) 34 (17, 48) 436 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Monterey County 7 *** 1,779.7 (1,728.7, 1,831.7) 35 (25, 46) 962 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Del Norte County 7 *** 1,778.6 (1,605.4, 1,965.4) 36 (5, 55) 80 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.0)
Sutter County 7 *** 1,771.4 (1,673.9, 1,873.2) 37 (16, 53) 249 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
San Bernardino County 7 *** 1,771.1 (1,746.3, 1,796.2) 38 (31, 44) 4,036 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Inyo County 7 *** 1,768.1 (1,586.5, 1,964.8) 39 (6, 55) 71 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Yolo County 7 *** 1,767.6 (1,693.5, 1,844.1) 40 (23, 51) 441 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Merced County 7 *** 1,756.5 (1,687.8, 1,827.2) 41 (26, 51) 504 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -2.0)
Fresno County 7 *** 1,741.4 (1,706.4, 1,776.9) 42 (34, 48) 1,944 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Madera County 7 *** 1,736.4 (1,654.5, 1,821.3) 43 (24, 53) 348 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Alameda County 7 *** 1,728.9 (1,703.5, 1,754.6) 44 (36, 48) 3,667 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.8)
Trinity County 7 *** 1,724.3 (1,521.9, 1,946.4) 45 (6, 56) 55 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
Santa Clara County 7 *** 1,696.8 (1,673.5, 1,720.3) 46 (40, 52) 4,129 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Mariposa County 7 *** 1,693.6 (1,525.3, 1,875.5) 47 (12, 56) 75 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Los Angeles County 7 *** 1,680.6 (1,670.4, 1,690.8) 48 (43, 53) 21,482 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
San Francisco County 7 *** 1,678.9 (1,646.9, 1,711.3) 49 (41, 53) 2,179 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1)
Kings County 7 *** 1,675.4 (1,581.1, 1,773.8) 50 (31, 55) 240 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Tulare County 7 *** 1,652.4 (1,601.3, 1,704.6) 51 (42, 55) 813 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Imperial County 7 *** 1,652.1 (1,576.3, 1,730.6) 52 (37, 55) 362 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Colusa County 7 *** 1,603.4 (1,402.3, 1,825.3) 53 (14, 56) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.6)
Siskiyou County 7 *** 1,580.6 (1,470.4, 1,696.9) 54 (38, 56) 159 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.3, -2.5)
Modoc County 7 *** 1,464.3 (1,244.7, 1,711.5) 55 (28, 57) 32 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.1)
Mono County 7 *** 1,354.2 (1,124.8, 1,617.7) 56 (41, 57) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Sierra County 7 *** 1,103.7 (799.6, 1,485.5) 57 (52, 57) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.0, 0.8)
Alpine County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/17/2021 9:29 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top