Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 7 N/A 10.1 (10.0, 10.3) N/A 4,595 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.6, -0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 47,920 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.4)
Del Norte County 7 Rural 10.4 (6.1, 16.9) 37 (1, 53) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.4)
Lassen County 7 Rural 9.7 (5.9, 15.3) 42 (2, 53) 4
*
*
Inyo County 7 Rural 14.9 (8.9, 24.0) 4 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Colusa County 7 Rural 17.8 (11.0, 27.2) 1 (1, 52) 4
*
*
Plumas County 7 Rural 15.0 (8.4, 25.2) 3 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Glenn County 7 Rural 13.0 (8.1, 19.9) 14 (1, 53) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.6, 3.5)
San Benito County 7 Urban 7.3 (4.7, 10.9) 53 (19, 53) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.7, 3.7)
Mariposa County 7 Rural 14.5 (9.3, 22.9) 6 (1, 53) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.9, 3.4)
Amador County 7 Rural 10.3 (6.9, 15.1) 39 (2, 53) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.9)
Siskiyou County 7 Rural 12.5 (9.1, 17.0) 20 (1, 52) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.3)
Calaveras County 7 Rural 14.0 (10.0, 19.3) 8 (1, 50) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.2, 1.1)
Yuba County 7 Urban 13.5 (10.1, 17.7) 10 (1, 49) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.5)
Tehama County 7 Rural 12.7 (9.5, 16.7) 17 (1, 52) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.4, 5.2)
Sutter County 7 Urban 11.0 (8.5, 14.2) 27 (4, 53) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 3.0)
Tuolumne County 7 Rural 12.5 (9.5, 16.4) 18 (1, 51) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Imperial County 7 Urban 7.6 (5.9, 9.7) 52 (33, 53) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 0.9)
Lake County 7 Rural 12.5 (9.6, 16.2) 19 (1, 50) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.7, 4.0)
Kings County 7 Urban 11.0 (8.6, 13.8) 30 (5, 52) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.1, 4.5)
Mendocino County 7 Rural 12.4 (9.7, 15.6) 21 (1, 50) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.8)
Madera County 7 Urban 9.9 (7.9, 12.4) 41 (10, 53) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.3)
Yolo County 7 Urban 9.3 (7.6, 11.4) 47 (17, 53) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Napa County 7 Urban 11.0 (9.0, 13.4) 28 (7, 51) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Merced County 7 Urban 8.9 (7.3, 10.6) 48 (23, 53) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Nevada County 7 Rural 14.5 (11.9, 17.6) 7 (1, 32) 27 rising rising trend 11.1 (1.7, 21.5)
Humboldt County 7 Rural 16.1 (13.4, 19.2) 2 (1, 20) 28 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.7)
Butte County 7 Urban 13.7 (11.7, 15.9) 9 (2, 33) 38 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.1)
Tulare County 7 Urban 8.7 (7.5, 10.0) 50 (31, 53) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
El Dorado County 7 Urban 13.3 (11.4, 15.5) 11 (2, 35) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Shasta County 7 Urban 14.6 (12.5, 16.9) 5 (1, 25) 39 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.6, 4.0)
Monterey County 7 Urban 8.7 (7.6, 10.0) 49 (31, 53) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Santa Cruz County 7 Urban 12.9 (11.2, 14.8) 15 (2, 37) 44 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 3.0)
Marin County 7 Urban 10.6 (9.3, 12.2) 34 (14, 49) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
San Luis Obispo County 7 Urban 13.2 (11.6, 15.1) 12 (3, 32) 53 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.4)
Solano County 7 Urban 10.7 (9.5, 12.1) 32 (14, 48) 59 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Stanislaus County 7 Urban 10.8 (9.6, 12.1) 31 (14, 47) 64 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Santa Barbara County 7 Urban 13.2 (11.8, 14.7) 13 (3, 30) 68 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.4)
Placer County 7 Urban 12.7 (11.4, 14.1) 16 (4, 32) 72 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.3, 3.5)
Sonoma County 7 Urban 11.0 (9.9, 12.2) 29 (13, 45) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Kern County 7 Urban 10.2 (9.3, 11.3) 40 (20, 48) 86 falling falling trend -2.6 (-11.8, -0.4)
San Joaquin County 7 Urban 11.2 (10.2, 12.3) 25 (13, 42) 91 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
San Mateo County 7 Urban 9.5 (8.7, 10.4) 43 (28, 51) 92 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Fresno County 7 Urban 10.7 (9.8, 11.6) 33 (18, 45) 105 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.8)
Ventura County 7 Urban 12.1 (11.2, 13.1) 22 (9, 33) 126 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.7)
San Francisco County 7 Urban 12.1 (11.1, 13.1) 23 (9, 34) 128 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Contra Costa County 7 Urban 10.6 (9.8, 11.4) 35 (21, 45) 151 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 4.8)
Alameda County 7 Urban 9.5 (8.9, 10.2) 44 (33, 50) 181 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Santa Clara County 7 Urban 9.4 (8.8, 10.0) 46 (34, 50) 202 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Sacramento County 7 Urban 11.6 (10.9, 12.4) 24 (13, 35) 205 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
San Bernardino County 7 Urban 9.4 (8.8, 10.0) 45 (33, 50) 207 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Riverside County 7 Urban 10.5 (9.9, 11.1) 36 (24, 43) 286 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Orange County 7 Urban 10.3 (9.9, 10.8) 38 (26, 43) 396 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
San Diego County 7 Urban 11.1 (10.6, 11.6) 26 (19, 37) 412 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
Los Angeles County 7 Urban 8.3 (8.0, 8.5) 51 (45, 53) 934 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -1.0)
Alpine County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 2:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alpine, Modoc, Mono, Sierra, Trinity

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top