Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

Esophagus (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 7 3.5 (3.4, 3.5) N/A 1,565 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 4.5 (4.5, 4.5) N/A 17,922 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Tehama County 7 6.5 (4.4, 9.4) 1 (1, 39) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.7)
Amador County 7 5.9 (3.6, 9.6) 2 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Tuolumne County 7 5.8 (3.6, 9.0) 3 (1, 45) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.0, 6.1)
Lake County 7 5.7 (3.8, 8.5) 4 (1, 43) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.1, 7.5)
Siskiyou County 7 5.7 (3.3, 9.4) 5 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Nevada County 7 5.5 (4.0, 7.4) 6 (1, 38) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.8)
Mendocino County 7 5.5 (3.8, 7.7) 7 (1, 42) 8
*
*
Yuba County 7 5.4 (3.3, 8.4) 8 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Shasta County 7 5.3 (4.2, 6.7) 9 (1, 32) 15 stable stable trend 16.4 (-1.7, 32.3)
Sutter County 7 5.1 (3.4, 7.4) 10 (1, 45) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 4.5)
Butte County 7 5.0 (3.9, 6.4) 11 (1, 37) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.2)
El Dorado County 7 4.8 (3.8, 6.1) 12 (2, 38) 16 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.7)
Sonoma County 7 4.8 (4.1, 5.6) 13 (3, 29) 35 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Placer County 7 4.4 (3.7, 5.3) 14 (4, 39) 26 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 3.1)
Humboldt County 7 4.4 (3.1, 6.1) 15 (2, 45) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 4.1)
Santa Barbara County 7 4.2 (3.5, 5.2) 16 (4, 41) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
San Joaquin County 7 4.2 (3.6, 4.9) 17 (7, 38) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.8)
Yolo County 7 4.2 (3.1, 5.6) 18 (2, 45) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.3)
Madera County 7 4.1 (2.9, 5.8) 19 (2, 45) 7 rising rising trend 23.5 (2.5, 44.1)
Monterey County 7 4.1 (3.3, 5.0) 20 (5, 43) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
Stanislaus County 7 4.1 (3.4, 4.9) 21 (7, 41) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Sacramento County 7 4.0 (3.6, 4.5) 22 (11, 37) 70 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
San Luis Obispo County 7 4.0 (3.2, 5.0) 23 (6, 44) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 2.0)
Tulare County 7 3.9 (3.1, 4.9) 24 (7, 44) 17 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 1.1)
Napa County 7 3.9 (2.8, 5.4) 25 (4, 45) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 1.2)
Kings County 7 3.9 (2.5, 5.7) 26 (2, 45) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.6, 6.2)
Kern County 7 3.8 (3.3, 4.5) 27 (10, 43) 32 rising rising trend 10.3 (0.5, 19.6)
Riverside County 7 3.8 (3.5, 4.1) 28 (15, 39) 105 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
San Diego County 7 3.8 (3.5, 4.1) 29 (16, 37) 143 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.8, 0.0)
Marin County 7 3.8 (3.0, 4.8) 30 (8, 45) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 1.0)
Calaveras County 7 3.7 (2.0, 6.6) 31 (2, 45) 3
*
*
San Francisco County 7 3.6 (3.1, 4.2) 32 (14, 43) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Ventura County 7 3.6 (3.1, 4.2) 33 (14, 43) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Merced County 7 3.6 (2.6, 4.8) 34 (7, 45) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.9)
San Bernardino County 7 3.5 (3.2, 3.9) 35 (19, 42) 75 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Santa Cruz County 7 3.5 (2.7, 4.6) 36 (9, 45) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.6)
San Mateo County 7 3.5 (3.0, 4.1) 37 (16, 44) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Fresno County 7 3.5 (3.0, 4.1) 38 (15, 44) 35 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.3)
Solano County 7 3.5 (2.8, 4.2) 39 (12, 45) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.3)
Contra Costa County 7 3.4 (3.0, 3.9) 40 (20, 44) 49 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Imperial County 7 3.3 (2.2, 4.7) 41 (7, 45) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.8)
Orange County 7 3.1 (2.8, 3.3) 42 (33, 45) 116 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Santa Clara County 7 3.1 (2.7, 3.4) 43 (31, 45) 64 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Alameda County 7 2.9 (2.6, 3.3) 44 (33, 45) 55 falling falling trend -6.1 (-16.7, -1.7)
Los Angeles County 7 2.7 (2.5, 2.8) 45 (41, 45) 298 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.3)
Alpine County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Benito County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/25/2024 2:01 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alpine, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Inyo, Lassen, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, San Benito, Sierra, Trinity

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top