Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
California 7 9.6 (9.4, 9.7) N/A 4,435 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.5, 8.6) N/A 34,900 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Lake County 7 12.8 (9.8, 16.6) 6 (1, 40) 14 rising rising trend 17.8 (7.8, 37.6)
Sutter County 7 13.3 (10.4, 16.7) 4 (1, 34) 15 rising rising trend 8.2 (5.8, 12.3)
Amador County 7 15.3 (11.4, 20.5) 2 (1, 27) 11 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.2, 10.1)
San Joaquin County 7 11.8 (10.7, 12.9) 12 (4, 21) 96 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.6, 6.4)
Kern County 7 10.8 (9.8, 11.9) 15 (7, 29) 92 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.4, 6.4)
Stanislaus County 7 9.6 (8.5, 10.8) 28 (12, 42) 59 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.2, 6.5)
Humboldt County 7 10.4 (8.4, 12.8) 19 (4, 44) 20 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.1, 7.7)
Imperial County 7 16.3 (13.8, 19.2) 1 (1, 8) 31 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.6, 7.6)
Ventura County 7 8.4 (7.6, 9.2) 41 (25, 46) 91 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.2, 6.5)
Merced County 7 11.8 (10.0, 13.8) 11 (2, 32) 31 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.9, 5.6)
Tehama County 7 10.1 (7.4, 13.6) 22 (3, 49) 10 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.5, 9.1)
Butte County 7 9.7 (8.2, 11.5) 24 (8, 45) 30 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.9, 6.2)
Kings County 7 12.2 (9.7, 15.1) 8 (1, 38) 17 stable stable trend 3.2 (0.0, 7.6)
Santa Barbara County 7 9.7 (8.5, 11.0) 26 (11, 43) 50 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.7, 5.2)
Riverside County 7 8.9 (8.5, 9.5) 32 (23, 42) 256 rising rising trend 3.1 (2.3, 4.1)
Santa Cruz County 7 8.7 (7.3, 10.3) 35 (15, 48) 30 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.4, 6.3)
Yolo County 7 8.6 (7.0, 10.6) 37 (12, 49) 20 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.1, 6.1)
Fresno County 7 13.6 (12.6, 14.7) 3 (1, 11) 138 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.6, 3.8)
Yuba County 7 11.8 (8.8, 15.7) 10 (1, 45) 10 stable stable trend 2.5 (0.0, 5.9)
Tulare County 7 10.1 (8.8, 11.5) 21 (9, 41) 45 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.8, 4.2)
San Luis Obispo County 7 8.9 (7.6, 10.4) 33 (14, 46) 38 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.7)
Marin County 7 6.8 (5.7, 8.1) 47 (37, 50) 30 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.3)
Orange County 7 8.6 (8.1, 9.0) 38 (28, 44) 328 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.8)
San Diego County 7 10.0 (9.6, 10.5) 23 (14, 30) 385 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.6, 1.9)
Siskiyou County 7 6.0 (3.6, 9.5) 49 (19, 50) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.2, 6.2)
Tuolumne County 7 7.8 (5.6, 10.9) 44 (10, 50) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.2, 5.5)
Madera County 7 12.5 (10.2, 15.1) 7 (1, 32) 22 stable stable trend 0.7 (-11.7, 4.8)
Mendocino County 7 8.7 (6.5, 11.4) 36 (7, 50) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.6)
El Dorado County 7 7.0 (5.7, 8.5) 46 (30, 50) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-12.1, 3.7)
Nevada County 7 5.6 (4.2, 7.5) 50 (40, 50) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.8)
Contra Costa County 7 8.1 (7.5, 8.8) 43 (28, 46) 119 stable stable trend -1.2 (-9.9, 2.7)
Santa Clara County 7 10.3 (9.7, 10.9) 20 (12, 29) 224 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 0.1)
Los Angeles County 7 9.0 (8.8, 9.3) 30 (24, 38) 1,023 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.1, -0.4)
Napa County 7 8.4 (6.7, 10.5) 40 (12, 49) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-16.3, 3.0)
San Mateo County 7 8.5 (7.7, 9.4) 39 (23, 46) 84 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.2)
Alameda County 7 9.4 (8.8, 10.0) 29 (18, 39) 180 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.2, 0.1)
Sonoma County 7 9.0 (8.0, 10.0) 31 (17, 44) 67 stable stable trend -1.9 (-8.7, 1.9)
Placer County 7 6.6 (5.7, 7.7) 48 (38, 50) 38 stable stable trend -2.0 (-9.1, 1.7)
San Bernardino County 7 10.5 (9.9, 11.1) 17 (11, 28) 231 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.0, 1.7)
Monterey County 7 9.6 (8.4, 11.0) 27 (10, 43) 46 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.3, 3.3)
Solano County 7 11.3 (10.1, 12.6) 14 (5, 28) 66 stable stable trend -3.3 (-13.2, 3.4)
Del Norte County 7 8.7 (5.3, 14.0) 34 (2, 50) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.3)
Sacramento County 7 11.3 (10.6, 12.0) 13 (7, 21) 204 stable stable trend -3.9 (-9.4, 2.8)
Shasta County 7 8.3 (6.8, 10.0) 42 (16, 49) 24 stable stable trend -7.2 (-15.3, 1.8)
San Francisco County 7 13.2 (12.2, 14.2) 5 (2, 13) 142 falling falling trend -13.2 (-17.4, -7.2)
Calaveras County 7 7.1 (4.6, 10.9) 45 (10, 50) 6
*
*
Colusa County 7 11.9 (6.7, 19.8) 9 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Glenn County 7 10.4 (6.2, 16.6) 18 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Lassen County 7 10.6 (6.5, 16.7) 16 (1, 50) 4
*
*
San Benito County 7 9.7 (6.7, 13.6) 25 (2, 50) 7
*
*
Alpine County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2024 12:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top