Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

Cervix (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 7 N/A 7.3 (7.1, 7.4) N/A 1,470 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 7.5 (7.5, 7.6) N/A 12,670 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.5)
Alameda County 7 Urban 5.1 (4.4, 5.8) 36 (29, 38) 47 falling falling trend -2.9 (-8.6, -0.8)
Butte County 7 Urban 11.7 (8.7, 15.4) 3 (1, 20) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.9, 4.3)
Contra Costa County 7 Urban 5.0 (4.2, 5.8) 37 (29, 38) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
El Dorado County 7 Urban 8.5 (5.9, 11.8) 13 (2, 37) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.4)
Fresno County 7 Urban 8.9 (7.7, 10.2) 11 (4, 23) 40 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 2.8)
Imperial County 7 Urban 7.8 (5.3, 11.0) 16 (2, 38) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.4, -0.5)
Kern County 7 Urban 9.3 (8.0, 10.7) 7 (3, 20) 38 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Kings County 7 Urban 9.4 (6.2, 13.7) 5 (1, 37) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.1, 4.4)
Los Angeles County 7 Urban 7.8 (7.5, 8.2) 15 (10, 24) 413 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 4.5)
Madera County 7 Urban 9.3 (6.4, 13.0) 9 (1, 36) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.6, 0.0)
Marin County 7 Urban 4.6 (3.1, 6.7) 38 (19, 38) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Merced County 7 Urban 11.5 (8.9, 14.5) 4 (1, 18) 14 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 3.9)
Monterey County 7 Urban 7.5 (5.9, 9.4) 18 (5, 36) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.1)
Napa County 7 Urban 5.6 (3.4, 8.9) 33 (6, 38) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.1, -0.3)
Orange County 7 Urban 6.7 (6.1, 7.3) 29 (18, 33) 113 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 7.7)
Placer County 7 Urban 5.4 (4.1, 7.1) 34 (16, 38) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Riverside County 7 Urban 7.8 (7.1, 8.6) 14 (9, 27) 92 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Sacramento County 7 Urban 6.4 (5.6, 7.2) 30 (17, 35) 52 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
San Bernardino County 7 Urban 9.4 (8.6, 10.3) 6 (3, 15) 98 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
San Diego County 7 Urban 7.4 (6.8, 8.0) 22 (12, 29) 124 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
San Francisco County 7 Urban 7.2 (6.1, 8.4) 24 (9, 33) 35 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 6.4)
San Joaquin County 7 Urban 7.0 (5.8, 8.3) 26 (9, 35) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.4)
San Luis Obispo County 7 Urban 7.1 (5.1, 9.7) 25 (4, 38) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.7, 6.2)
San Mateo County 7 Urban 5.9 (4.9, 7.1) 31 (17, 38) 24 stable stable trend 14.5 (-2.5, 25.6)
Santa Barbara County 7 Urban 6.9 (5.3, 8.7) 28 (7, 38) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.1)
Santa Clara County 7 Urban 5.4 (4.8, 6.1) 35 (27, 38) 54 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.1, 12.4)
Santa Cruz County 7 Urban 7.5 (5.5, 9.9) 19 (4, 37) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 3.8)
Shasta County 7 Urban 9.3 (6.5, 12.8) 8 (1, 36) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.0, 6.3)
Solano County 7 Urban 6.9 (5.4, 8.6) 27 (8, 37) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.6)
Sonoma County 7 Urban 5.7 (4.4, 7.3) 32 (15, 38) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.6)
Stanislaus County 7 Urban 7.5 (6.0, 9.1) 20 (6, 35) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.3)
Tulare County 7 Urban 8.6 (6.9, 10.6) 12 (3, 30) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 2.0)
Ventura County 7 Urban 7.5 (6.3, 8.7) 21 (8, 32) 33 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.5)
Yolo County 7 Urban 7.3 (5.0, 10.3) 23 (3, 38) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.2)
Yuba County 7 Urban 13.8 (8.9, 20.5) 1 (1, 29) 5
*
*
Humboldt County 7 Rural 7.8 (5.0, 11.5) 17 (2, 38) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.3)
Lake County 7 Rural 13.6 (8.2, 21.0) 2 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.9, 5.6)
Mendocino County 7 Rural 9.2 (5.6, 14.3) 10 (1, 38) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.8, 5.8)
Alpine County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calaveras County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colusa County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Del Norte County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glenn County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Inyo County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lassen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mariposa County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plumas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Benito County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutter County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tehama County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuolumne County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/14/2024 2:27 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top