Incidence Rates Table
County
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California 7 | 27.0 (26.7, 27.3) | N/A | 6,421 |
rising 
|
1.8 (1.6, 2.0) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 27.4 (27.3, 27.5) | N/A | 56,871 |
rising
|
1.2 (1.1, 1.3) |
| Alameda County 7 | 27.5 (26.0, 29.0) | 15 (6, 33) | 280 |
rising
|
1.0 (0.6, 1.4) |
| Amador County 7 | 20.8 (13.6, 31.3) | 49 (1, 51) | 7 |
stable 
|
-2.1 (-6.1, 1.8) |
| Butte County 7 | 25.3 (21.7, 29.4) | 33 (3, 49) | 39 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.2, 1.8) |
| Calaveras County 7 | 23.4 (15.7, 33.8) | 43 (1, 51) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-4.8, 3.9) |
| Colusa County 7 | 28.3 (16.3, 45.9) | 10 (1, 51) | 3 |
|
|
| Contra Costa County 7 | 28.0 (26.3, 29.8) | 11 (4, 33) | 218 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.4, 1.0) |
| Del Norte County 7 | 27.6 (17.1, 42.7) | 13 (1, 51) | 5 |
stable
|
0.2 (-4.2, 5.1) |
| El Dorado County 7 | 24.6 (21.0, 28.8) | 37 (5, 49) | 37 |
rising
|
1.9 (0.5, 3.6) |
| Fresno County 7 | 24.3 (22.4, 26.3) | 38 (17, 47) | 126 |
rising
|
2.2 (1.1, 3.5) |
| Glenn County 7 | 31.7 (20.6, 47.0) | 1 (1, 51) | 5 |
stable
|
26.1 (-0.7, 52.0) |
| Humboldt County 7 | 25.6 (21.0, 31.1) | 30 (2, 49) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.5, 1.9) |
| Imperial County 7 | 26.4 (21.8, 31.6) | 27 (1, 49) | 24 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.3, 3.0) |
| Inyo County 7 | 31.4 (18.2, 51.1) | 2 (1, 51) | 4 |
stable
|
2.0 (-3.3, 7.8) |
| Kern County 7 | 26.6 (24.4, 28.9) | 25 (5, 42) | 116 |
rising
|
2.2 (1.3, 5.9) |
| Kings County 7 | 26.9 (21.5, 33.3) | 21 (1, 50) | 17 |
rising
|
7.1 (3.1, 18.9) |
| Lake County 7 | 23.8 (17.5, 31.9) | 39 (1, 51) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-3.1, 2.6) |
| Lassen County 7 | 22.0 (13.0, 35.8) | 47 (1, 51) | 4 |
stable
|
0.8 (-3.6, 5.8) |
| Los Angeles County 7 | 27.5 (26.9, 28.2) | 14 (8, 27) | 1,650 |
rising
|
1.5 (1.3, 1.8) |
| Madera County 7 | 23.8 (19.3, 28.9) | 40 (4, 50) | 21 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.4, 2.8) |
| Marin County 7 | 26.7 (23.6, 30.2) | 23 (3, 45) | 59 |
stable
|
3.4 (-0.1, 11.2) |
| Mendocino County 7 | 29.8 (23.9, 36.8) | 5 (1, 46) | 21 |
rising
|
2.7 (0.5, 5.3) |
| Merced County 7 | 22.8 (19.3, 26.8) | 45 (11, 50) | 31 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.0, 2.8) |
| Monterey County 7 | 24.7 (21.9, 27.7) | 36 (8, 48) | 59 |
stable
|
2.8 (-0.9, 9.5) |
| Napa County 7 | 26.8 (22.1, 32.2) | 22 (1, 48) | 26 |
stable
|
0.5 (-1.2, 2.3) |
| Nevada County 7 | 21.7 (17.3, 27.1) | 48 (9, 51) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.7, 0.9) |
| Orange County 7 | 25.2 (24.2, 26.2) | 35 (21, 43) | 502 |
stable
|
1.7 (-1.1, 4.8) |
| Placer County 7 | 25.2 (22.7, 28.0) | 34 (7, 47) | 76 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-7.1, 1.7) |
| Riverside County 7 | 25.6 (24.4, 26.8) | 31 (16, 42) | 363 |
rising
|
1.9 (1.1, 2.8) |
| Sacramento County 7 | 30.9 (29.3, 32.6) | 3 (1, 13) | 292 |
rising
|
2.4 (1.6, 3.3) |
| San Benito County 7 | 18.7 (12.9, 26.3) | 50 (9, 51) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-4.4, 3.9) |
| San Bernardino County 7 | 29.1 (27.7, 30.5) | 8 (2, 24) | 342 |
rising
|
2.9 (2.0, 5.8) |
| San Diego County 7 | 27.0 (26.0, 28.1) | 20 (9, 34) | 537 |
rising
|
1.6 (1.0, 2.3) |
| San Francisco County 7 | 26.1 (24.1, 28.1) | 28 (7, 43) | 138 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.1, 1.0) |
| San Joaquin County 7 | 28.0 (25.7, 30.4) | 12 (3, 37) | 118 |
rising
|
2.2 (1.0, 3.7) |
| San Luis Obispo County 7 | 22.5 (19.5, 25.9) | 46 (17, 50) | 46 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.6, 2.4) |
| San Mateo County 7 | 27.3 (25.3, 29.4) | 17 (5, 40) | 140 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.2, 1.1) |
| Santa Barbara County 7 | 29.6 (26.6, 32.9) | 6 (1, 34) | 77 |
rising
|
2.3 (0.9, 3.8) |
| Santa Clara County 7 | 26.6 (25.3, 28.0) | 24 (9, 38) | 300 |
rising
|
1.3 (0.7, 2.1) |
| Santa Cruz County 7 | 26.0 (22.6, 29.8) | 29 (3, 47) | 46 |
stable
|
0.9 (-1.4, 3.6) |
| Shasta County 7 | 27.4 (23.5, 31.9) | 16 (1, 46) | 38 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.8, 3.8) |
| Siskiyou County 7 | 16.4 (11.1, 24.0) | 51 (27, 51) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-5.2, 1.6) |
| Solano County 7 | 30.7 (27.9, 33.8) | 4 (1, 27) | 93 |
rising
|
1.8 (0.3, 3.7) |
| Sonoma County 7 | 26.4 (24.0, 29.1) | 26 (5, 43) | 100 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.3, 1.3) |
| Stanislaus County 7 | 27.1 (24.6, 29.9) | 19 (3, 43) | 83 |
rising
|
2.1 (0.8, 3.7) |
| Sutter County 7 | 23.0 (17.7, 29.6) | 44 (2, 51) | 13 |
stable
|
2.9 (-0.7, 13.9) |
| Tehama County 7 | 23.6 (17.6, 31.2) | 42 (2, 51) | 11 |
stable
|
1.7 (-1.6, 5.8) |
| Tulare County 7 | 25.5 (22.6, 28.6) | 32 (6, 47) | 59 |
rising
|
1.6 (0.2, 3.2) |
| Tuolumne County 7 | 29.0 (22.0, 38.0) | 9 (1, 49) | 14 |
stable
|
1.5 (-1.7, 5.0) |
| Ventura County 7 | 27.3 (25.3, 29.4) | 18 (5, 39) | 150 |
rising
|
1.6 (0.9, 2.4) |
| Yolo County 7 | 29.3 (25.0, 34.2) | 7 (1, 43) | 34 |
stable
|
2.1 (-0.6, 5.5) |
| Yuba County 7 | 23.7 (17.3, 31.6) | 41 (1, 51) | 10 |
stable
|
1.0 (-2.1, 4.7) |
| Alpine County 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mariposa County 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Modoc County 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mono County 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Plumas County 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sierra County 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Trinity County 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/18/2024 5:45 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alpine, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, Sierra, Trinity
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/18/2024 5:45 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alpine, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Plumas, Sierra, Trinity
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.