Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 7 18.0 (17.8, 18.2) N/A 7,721 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 19.0 (18.9, 19.0) N/A 71,841 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Glenn County 7 28.5 (20.7, 38.3) 1 (1, 39) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.1)
Santa Cruz County 7 23.0 (20.6, 25.6) 2 (1, 16) 74 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Marin County 7 22.0 (19.8, 24.3) 3 (1, 20) 85 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Del Norte County 7 20.3 (14.1, 28.6) 4 (1, 52) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.4, 1.5)
Butte County 7 20.3 (17.9, 22.9) 5 (1, 39) 56 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Santa Clara County 7 20.0 (19.1, 20.9) 6 (3, 22) 413 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Yuba County 7 19.9 (15.5, 25.1) 7 (1, 50) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Contra Costa County 7 19.7 (18.6, 20.8) 8 (4, 27) 265 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
San Mateo County 7 19.6 (18.4, 21.0) 9 (3, 30) 182 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Humboldt County 7 19.5 (16.5, 23.0) 10 (1, 46) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Orange County 7 19.4 (18.8, 20.1) 11 (6, 25) 691 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.4)
Monterey County 7 19.4 (17.6, 21.4) 12 (3, 38) 85 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Shasta County 7 19.4 (16.9, 22.2) 13 (2, 44) 49 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
San Luis Obispo County 7 19.4 (17.4, 21.6) 14 (2, 41) 75 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Mendocino County 7 19.3 (15.7, 23.5) 15 (1, 48) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Santa Barbara County 7 19.2 (17.4, 21.0) 16 (3, 39) 95 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Yolo County 7 19.0 (16.4, 21.9) 17 (2, 46) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Tehama County 7 18.8 (14.9, 23.5) 18 (1, 50) 17 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.5)
Alameda County 7 18.8 (17.9, 19.7) 19 (7, 33) 334 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Placer County 7 18.8 (17.1, 20.6) 20 (4, 41) 99 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.5, 0.5)
Solano County 7 18.6 (16.9, 20.4) 21 (4, 42) 95 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
San Diego County 7 18.6 (18.0, 19.2) 22 (10, 32) 661 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Madera County 7 18.6 (15.7, 21.8) 23 (2, 48) 30 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Amador County 7 18.5 (13.8, 24.6) 24 (1, 52) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.8)
Sutter County 7 18.3 (14.9, 22.4) 25 (2, 50) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
San Joaquin County 7 18.0 (16.7, 19.5) 26 (7, 42) 134 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Fresno County 7 18.0 (16.7, 19.2) 27 (9, 42) 167 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
San Francisco County 7 17.9 (16.8, 19.1) 28 (10, 41) 186 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Sonoma County 7 17.8 (16.4, 19.4) 29 (8, 45) 122 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Ventura County 7 17.7 (16.5, 18.9) 30 (12, 43) 175 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Stanislaus County 7 17.7 (16.1, 19.3) 31 (8, 46) 98 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Sacramento County 7 17.6 (16.7, 18.5) 32 (15, 42) 291 stable stable trend -5.9 (-11.5, 0.0)
Merced County 7 17.3 (15.0, 19.8) 33 (5, 50) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Los Angeles County 7 17.2 (16.9, 17.6) 34 (24, 41) 1,848 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Imperial County 7 17.1 (14.5, 20.0) 35 (4, 50) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Napa County 7 17.0 (14.4, 20.0) 36 (4, 51) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Riverside County 7 16.8 (16.1, 17.6) 37 (25, 45) 438 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
Tuolumne County 7 16.8 (13.0, 21.4) 38 (2, 52) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.4)
El Dorado County 7 16.4 (14.3, 18.8) 39 (9, 50) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Kern County 7 16.4 (15.1, 17.7) 40 (23, 49) 131 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Calaveras County 7 16.1 (12.1, 21.4) 41 (3, 53) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.4)
Tulare County 7 16.0 (14.3, 17.8) 42 (20, 50) 67 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
San Bernardino County 7 15.8 (15.0, 16.6) 43 (34, 49) 320 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Nevada County 7 15.6 (12.8, 18.9) 44 (8, 52) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
Colusa County 7 14.8 (8.3, 24.2) 45 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Kings County 7 14.4 (11.6, 17.7) 46 (15, 53) 19 stable stable trend 13.5 (-2.9, 32.7)
Inyo County 7 14.3 (8.9, 22.7) 47 (2, 53) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.8)
Mariposa County 7 13.9 (7.8, 23.6) 48 (1, 53) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.2, 3.4)
San Benito County 7 13.6 (9.8, 18.4) 49 (6, 53) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.4)
Siskiyou County 7 13.4 (9.7, 18.4) 50 (7, 53) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.1)
Lassen County 7 13.1 (8.1, 20.1) 51 (3, 53) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.1)
Lake County 7 12.6 (9.6, 16.5) 52 (26, 53) 13 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.6, 0.8)
Plumas County 7 11.3 (6.1, 19.7) 53 (4, 53) 3 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.1, 0.5)
Alpine County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 11:14 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alpine, Modoc, Mono, Sierra, Trinity

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top