Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

Colon & Rectum, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 3,8 Yes 37.1 (36.8, 37.4) 14,405 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.5, -2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 39.8 (39.7, 39.9) 139,083 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Los Angeles County 7,8 Yes 38.0 (37.4, 38.5) 3,744 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.3, -3.0)
San Diego County 7,8 Yes 35.7 (34.7, 36.6) 1,149 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Orange County 7,8 Yes 34.7 (33.8, 35.7) 1,119 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.4, -2.1)
Riverside County 7,8 Yes 38.1 (37.0, 39.3) 868 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
San Bernardino County 7,8 No 42.0 (40.6, 43.4) 745 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Santa Clara County 7,8 Yes 35.6 (34.4, 36.8) 658 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.7)
Sacramento County 7,8 No 40.4 (38.9, 41.9) 593 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.9, -2.7)
Alameda County 7,8 Yes 35.6 (34.3, 37.0) 569 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.3, -1.9)
Contra Costa County 7,8 No 40.0 (38.4, 41.7) 483 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.6, -1.4)
San Francisco County 7,8 Yes 39.2 (37.4, 41.0) 376 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.4, -2.5)
Fresno County 7,8 Yes 36.2 (34.4, 38.1) 309 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Ventura County 7,8 Yes 34.7 (33.0, 36.5) 306 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.2, -2.8)
San Mateo County 7,8 Yes 34.4 (32.6, 36.2) 295 stable stable trend -3.1 (-15.1, 10.6)
Kern County 7,8 Yes 36.9 (34.9, 38.9) 263 stable stable trend 2.4 (-8.5, 14.6)
San Joaquin County 7,8 Yes 39.3 (37.1, 41.5) 259 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Sonoma County 7,8 Yes 39.2 (36.9, 41.5) 238 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.9)
Stanislaus County 7,8 No 41.9 (39.4, 44.6) 210 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Solano County 7,8 Yes 38.6 (36.0, 41.4) 172 falling falling trend -7.2 (-12.5, -1.6)
Santa Barbara County 7,8 Yes 34.4 (32.0, 37.0) 159 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Placer County 7,8 Yes 34.8 (32.4, 37.3) 158 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
Tulare County 7,8 Yes 34.6 (32.0, 37.4) 132 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.4)
Marin County 7,8 Yes 33.5 (30.8, 36.3) 122 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
San Luis Obispo County 7,8 Yes 34.2 (31.4, 37.2) 119 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.4)
Monterey County 7,8 Yes 29.1 (26.8, 31.6) 118 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.2, -2.7)
Butte County 7,8 No 40.5 (37.1, 44.2) 112 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.7, 4.2)
Santa Cruz County 7,8 Yes 31.9 (29.0, 35.2) 91 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -1.6)
Shasta County 7,8 Yes 37.6 (34.2, 41.4) 91 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.3)
El Dorado County 7,8 Yes 36.7 (33.2, 40.5) 86 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Merced County 7,8 Yes 38.0 (34.4, 41.9) 84 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.1)
Napa County 7,8 Yes 36.5 (32.5, 40.8) 64 falling falling trend -7.5 (-11.3, -3.5)
Humboldt County 7,8 No 40.7 (36.2, 45.7) 62 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.1)
Yolo County 7,8 Yes 33.2 (29.5, 37.2) 61 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Imperial County 7,8 Yes 35.2 (31.2, 39.5) 59 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.7)
Madera County 7,8 Yes 34.3 (30.1, 38.8) 51 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.3, -2.7)
Nevada County 7,8 Yes 32.5 (28.2, 37.4) 47 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.3, -2.5)
Kings County 7,8 Yes 35.5 (30.8, 40.7) 42 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.2, -1.3)
Mendocino County 7,8 Yes 36.3 (31.3, 42.0) 41 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.8)
Lake County 7,8 No 43.6 (37.5, 50.5) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Sutter County 7,8 Yes 32.8 (28.0, 38.2) 34 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.1, -2.8)
Tehama County 7,8 No 40.8 (34.6, 47.7) 33 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.8, -1.6)
Tuolumne County 7,8 Yes 38.6 (32.5, 45.6) 32 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.3)
Yuba County 7,8 Yes 38.2 (31.7, 45.5) 26 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.5)
Calaveras County 7,8 Yes 36.4 (29.9, 44.1) 25 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.8, -1.7)
San Benito County 7,8 No 40.6 (33.2, 49.1) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.5)
Amador County 7,8 Yes 33.8 (27.4, 41.7) 21 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.9, -1.5)
Siskiyou County 7,8 Yes 29.7 (23.9, 36.7) 20 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.9, -2.5)
Glenn County 7,8 No 46.5 (36.3, 58.7) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.8, 3.6)
Lassen County 7,8 Yes 34.5 (26.0, 45.0) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.4, 4.8)
Del Norte County 7,8 Yes 35.3 (26.6, 46.1) 11 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.3, 1.2)
Mariposa County 7,8 No 40.6 (29.9, 54.3) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.7, 1.9)
Plumas County 7,8 Yes 35.6 (26.3, 47.7) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 2.1)
Inyo County 7,8 Yes 30.8 (21.6, 43.1) 8 stable stable trend -3.8 (-7.9, 0.4)
Trinity County 7,8 Yes 33.7 (23.3, 48.3) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.9, 1.8)
Colusa County 7,8 Yes 32.1 (22.2, 45.0) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.4, 2.5)
Modoc County 7,8 Yes 31.0 (19.1, 48.8) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.7, 1.2)
Mono County 7,8 Yes 23.6 (13.9, 37.8) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-8.8, 6.1)
Alpine County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/24/2017 7:05 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2016 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top