Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

Colon & Rectum, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 3,8 Yes 36.2 (36.0, 36.5) 14,418 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 39.2 (39.1, 39.3) 139,950 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Los Angeles County 7,8 Yes 37.0 (36.4, 37.5) 3,731 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.6, -2.7)
San Diego County 7,8 Yes 35.0 (34.0, 35.9) 1,152 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Orange County 7,8 Yes 34.2 (33.3, 35.1) 1,131 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.3, -2.2)
Riverside County 7,8 Yes 37.7 (36.6, 38.8) 885 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
San Bernardino County 7,8 No 41.9 (40.6, 43.3) 769 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Santa Clara County 7,8 Yes 34.5 (33.3, 35.7) 657 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Sacramento County 7,8 Yes 39.5 (38.1, 41.0) 597 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Alameda County 7,8 Yes 34.9 (33.6, 36.2) 572 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.5, -2.3)
Contra Costa County 7,8 Yes 38.3 (36.7, 39.9) 472 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.7, -2.0)
San Francisco County 7,8 Yes 37.7 (35.9, 39.5) 367 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Ventura County 7,8 Yes 33.8 (32.1, 35.6) 307 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.6, -2.9)
Fresno County 7,8 Yes 34.9 (33.2, 36.8) 304 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
San Mateo County 7,8 Yes 32.6 (30.9, 34.4) 286 stable stable trend -0.4 (-9.3, 9.5)
Kern County 7,8 Yes 36.0 (34.1, 38.1) 262 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
San Joaquin County 7,8 Yes 38.4 (36.3, 40.5) 262 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Sonoma County 7,8 Yes 38.4 (36.2, 40.7) 240 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -2.0)
Stanislaus County 7,8 No 40.0 (37.5, 42.5) 205 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Solano County 7,8 Yes 36.7 (34.2, 39.3) 169 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.7, -1.9)
Santa Barbara County 7,8 Yes 34.1 (31.8, 36.6) 160 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Placer County 7,8 Yes 33.2 (30.9, 35.7) 157 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Tulare County 7,8 Yes 34.6 (32.0, 37.4) 134 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Monterey County 7,8 Yes 30.2 (27.8, 32.7) 125 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.7, -2.2)
Marin County 7,8 Yes 32.8 (30.2, 35.7) 121 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.7)
San Luis Obispo County 7,8 Yes 33.3 (30.6, 36.2) 118 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.9, -2.2)
Butte County 7,8 No 40.5 (37.1, 44.1) 113 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Shasta County 7,8 Yes 37.2 (33.8, 41.0) 92 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.6)
Santa Cruz County 7,8 Yes 31.2 (28.3, 34.3) 92 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.7)
Merced County 7,8 Yes 39.1 (35.5, 43.0) 88 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)
El Dorado County 7,8 Yes 35.7 (32.3, 39.5) 86 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Napa County 7,8 Yes 35.7 (31.8, 40.0) 64 stable stable trend -1.2 (-10.3, 8.7)
Yolo County 7,8 Yes 33.6 (30.0, 37.6) 64 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.9)
Imperial County 7,8 Yes 36.7 (32.7, 41.0) 63 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Humboldt County 7,8 Yes 36.7 (32.4, 41.4) 57 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.8, -1.6)
Madera County 7,8 Yes 32.7 (28.7, 37.1) 50 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.3, -2.5)
Nevada County 7,8 Yes 32.6 (28.3, 37.4) 48 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.7, -2.3)
Kings County 7,8 Yes 33.9 (29.4, 38.9) 42 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.7, -1.6)
Lake County 7,8 No 41.8 (35.8, 48.6) 39 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Mendocino County 7,8 Yes 31.7 (27.0, 37.0) 36 falling falling trend -14.1 (-26.0, -0.4)
Sutter County 7,8 Yes 32.0 (27.3, 37.4) 33 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.8, -2.7)
Tehama County 7,8 Yes 39.9 (33.8, 46.8) 32 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.0, -2.0)
Tuolumne County 7,8 Yes 31.6 (26.1, 38.2) 26 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.2, -1.4)
Yuba County 7,8 Yes 37.3 (30.9, 44.5) 25 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.1)
Calaveras County 7,8 Yes 33.2 (27.3, 40.3) 24 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.6, -2.1)
San Benito County 7,8 No 41.9 (34.4, 50.5) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.4)
Amador County 7,8 Yes 34.3 (27.8, 42.2) 21 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.2)
Siskiyou County 7,8 Yes 30.2 (24.3, 37.3) 20 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.2)
Glenn County 7,8 No 51.3 (40.6, 63.9) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 3.9)
Del Norte County 7,8 Yes 35.8 (27.0, 46.6) 12 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.3, 1.0)
Lassen County 7,8 Yes 33.1 (24.9, 43.3) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.5, 4.2)
Plumas County 7,8 Yes 34.8 (25.8, 46.6) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.1)
Mariposa County 7,8 Yes 36.1 (26.5, 48.8) 11 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.5, 1.0)
Inyo County 7,8 Yes 33.6 (23.8, 46.4) 9 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.6, -0.4)
Colusa County 7,8 Yes 35.3 (24.9, 48.6) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.8, 3.0)
Trinity County 7,8 Yes 33.9 (23.4, 48.6) 8 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.7, 0.9)
Modoc County 7,8 Yes 30.5 (18.8, 48.3) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.2, 0.6)
Mono County 7,8 Yes 25.5 (15.5, 40.0) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-8.5, 4.5)
Alpine County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/24/2018 4:32 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2017 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top