Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

Colon & Rectum, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 3,8 Yes 32.6 (32.3, 33.0) 6,892 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.2, -2.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 34.8 (34.7, 34.9) 66,668 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Lassen County 7,8 Yes 22.6 (13.4, 36.4) 4 stable stable trend -5.5 (-10.7, 0.0)
Inyo County 7,8 Yes 25.4 (15.5, 40.9) 4 stable stable trend -4.5 (-11.2, 2.7)
Monterey County 7,8 Yes 25.5 (22.5, 28.7) 56 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.7)
Nevada County 7,8 Yes 26.5 (21.1, 32.9) 21 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.9, -3.5)
Madera County 7,8 Yes 27.0 (22.1, 32.7) 22 falling falling trend -8.0 (-12.1, -3.8)
Santa Cruz County 7,8 Yes 28.0 (24.2, 32.2) 43 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -0.8)
Siskiyou County 7,8 Yes 28.0 (20.1, 38.3) 10 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.3, -0.7)
Imperial County 7,8 Yes 28.8 (24.0, 34.3) 26 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.7, 7.5)
Amador County 7,8 Yes 29.4 (21.2, 40.6) 9 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.4, 0.1)
Placer County 7,8 Yes 29.5 (26.5, 32.8) 74 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.4, 0.0)
Del Norte County 7,8 Yes 29.6 (18.5, 45.3) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.6, 1.6)
Colusa County 7,8 Yes 29.8 (17.1, 48.3) 3 stable stable trend -2.6 (-8.7, 3.9)
Marin County 7,8 Yes 29.8 (26.4, 33.6) 60 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Tulare County 7,8 Yes 30.2 (26.9, 33.8) 61 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.6)
Ventura County 7,8 Yes 30.2 (28.0, 32.6) 145 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
San Mateo County 7,8 Yes 30.3 (28.1, 32.7) 144 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.9)
Trinity County 7,8 Yes 30.3 (16.8, 53.1) 3
*
*
Sutter County 7,8 Yes 30.4 (24.1, 37.9) 17 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -0.6)
Orange County 7,8 Yes 30.5 (29.4, 31.7) 536 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Santa Barbara County 7,8 Yes 30.7 (27.6, 34.1) 77 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Calaveras County 7,8 Yes 30.8 (22.5, 41.7) 11 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.4, 0.1)
Napa County 7,8 Yes 31.1 (26.1, 36.8) 30 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.1)
Kern County 7,8 Yes 31.2 (28.7, 33.9) 116 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
San Luis Obispo County 7,8 Yes 31.2 (27.6, 35.3) 59 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.8)
San Diego County 7,8 Yes 31.4 (30.2, 32.6) 553 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Alameda County 7,8 Yes 31.5 (29.8, 33.2) 278 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.3, -2.4)
Kings County 7,8 Yes 31.6 (25.5, 38.8) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.9)
Fresno County 7,8 Yes 31.9 (29.6, 34.3) 147 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Santa Clara County 7,8 Yes 32.1 (30.5, 33.7) 320 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Yolo County 7,8 Yes 32.2 (27.4, 37.7) 33 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.2, 0.0)
Shasta County 7,8 Yes 32.6 (28.3, 37.5) 43 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.4, 8.1)
Solano County 7,8 Yes 32.6 (29.4, 36.1) 78 falling falling trend -9.4 (-14.4, -4.1)
Los Angeles County 7,8 Yes 32.9 (32.3, 33.6) 1,801 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.2, -2.7)
Riverside County 7,8 Yes 33.2 (31.8, 34.7) 401 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
El Dorado County 7,8 Yes 33.7 (29.2, 38.8) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Merced County 7,8 Yes 34.4 (29.8, 39.5) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.3)
Yuba County 7,8 Yes 34.4 (26.2, 44.4) 12 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.2, -0.2)
San Bernardino County 7,8 Yes 34.6 (32.9, 36.4) 330 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Mendocino County 7,8 Yes 34.8 (28.0, 42.9) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
San Joaquin County 7,8 Yes 34.9 (32.2, 37.8) 125 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.2)
Plumas County 7,8 Yes 35.3 (22.2, 54.8) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.1, 5.5)
Glenn County 7,8 Yes 35.4 (23.7, 51.1) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.1, 7.6)
Contra Costa County 7,8 Yes 35.8 (33.8, 38.0) 239 falling falling trend -5.7 (-9.8, -1.5)
San Francisco County 7,8 Yes 36.1 (33.7, 38.6) 183 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
Sonoma County 7,8 Yes 36.2 (33.3, 39.4) 122 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Sacramento County 7,8 Yes 36.5 (34.7, 38.5) 297 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Tehama County 7,8 Yes 36.6 (28.8, 46.1) 16 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.3)
Stanislaus County 7,8 Yes 36.9 (33.7, 40.3) 101 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
San Benito County 7,8 Yes 37.1 (27.7, 48.7) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.1, 6.1)
Mariposa County 7,8 Yes 37.4 (24.5, 56.7) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.3, 3.2)
Humboldt County 7,8 Yes 38.1 (32.0, 44.9) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.1)
Tuolumne County 7,8 Yes 38.9 (30.2, 49.8) 16 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.5, 0.6)
Butte County 7,8 No 39.9 (35.3, 45.0) 59 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Lake County 7,8 No 43.1 (34.7, 53.3) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.4)
Alpine County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/23/2017 10:37 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2016 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top