Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California 3,8 *** 39.9 (39.5, 40.3) 8,316 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 52.6 (52.5, 52.8) 101,519 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Los Angeles County 7,8 *** 32.9 (32.2, 33.6) 1,760 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.4, -2.3)
San Diego County 7,8 *** 42.0 (40.6, 43.4) 724 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Orange County 7,8 *** 38.1 (36.8, 39.4) 657 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.8, -2.2)
Riverside County 7,8 *** 42.5 (40.9, 44.2) 518 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 4.0)
Sacramento County 7,8 *** 51.0 (48.8, 53.3) 411 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
San Bernardino County 7,8 *** 39.9 (38.1, 41.8) 371 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.7)
Santa Clara County 7,8 *** 35.6 (33.9, 37.3) 345 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Alameda County 7,8 *** 38.8 (37.0, 40.8) 335 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Contra Costa County 7,8 *** 45.2 (42.8, 47.6) 292 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
San Francisco County 7,8 *** 39.1 (36.6, 41.6) 200 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
San Mateo County 7,8 *** 41.2 (38.6, 43.9) 196 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Fresno County 7,8 *** 42.6 (39.9, 45.4) 192 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Ventura County 7,8 *** 39.2 (36.7, 41.8) 186 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Kern County 7,8 *** 48.2 (45.0, 51.5) 174 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
San Joaquin County 7,8 *** 48.9 (45.6, 52.3) 172 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Sonoma County 7,8 *** 45.1 (41.8, 48.6) 149 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Stanislaus County 7,8 *** 50.3 (46.5, 54.2) 137 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.3)
Solano County 7,8 *** 50.6 (46.6, 54.9) 121 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Placer County 7,8 *** 45.2 (41.6, 49.1) 117 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Santa Barbara County 7,8 *** 36.5 (33.2, 40.1) 94 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Butte County 7,8 *** 56.6 (51.3, 62.5) 86 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Marin County 7,8 *** 41.0 (37.0, 45.3) 82 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
San Luis Obispo County 7,8 *** 42.4 (38.3, 46.9) 81 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Monterey County 7,8 *** 35.2 (31.7, 39.0) 76 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.1)
Shasta County 7,8 *** 51.6 (46.3, 57.4) 72 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.0)
Tulare County 7,8 *** 35.5 (31.9, 39.4) 72 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.2, -1.9)
El Dorado County 7,8 *** 44.6 (39.4, 50.4) 56 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Merced County 7,8 *** 48.0 (42.5, 54.0) 56 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Santa Cruz County 7,8 *** 32.1 (28.0, 36.7) 48 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.2, -2.0)
Humboldt County 7,8 *** 49.3 (42.7, 56.7) 42 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.9, -1.3)
Yolo County 7,8 *** 43.4 (37.6, 49.7) 42 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.2)
Napa County 7,8 *** 43.1 (37.3, 49.7) 41 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.5, -1.7)
Nevada County 7,8 *** 43.5 (37.3, 50.8) 37 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.0, -0.1)
Lake County 7,8 *** 74.3 (63.6, 86.5) 37 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.2)
Madera County 7,8 *** 37.2 (31.4, 43.8) 30 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Sutter County 7,8 *** 51.9 (43.7, 61.2) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.2)
Mendocino County 7,8 *** 42.3 (35.1, 50.7) 27 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.0, 0.1)
Tuolumne County 7,8 *** 52.9 (43.8, 63.9) 25 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.5)
Imperial County 7,8 *** 28.0 (23.2, 33.4) 24 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.6)
Tehama County 7,8 *** 52.8 (43.5, 63.7) 23 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.1, -1.7)
Amador County 7,8 *** 63.2 (51.4, 77.8) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.5)
Kings County 7,8 *** 37.5 (30.7, 45.3) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 2.1)
Siskiyou County 7,8 *** 56.5 (46.0, 69.1) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.6)
Calaveras County 7,8 *** 45.3 (36.2, 56.7) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.2, 1.8)
Yuba County 7,8 *** 50.5 (40.5, 62.2) 18 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.2)
Del Norte County 7,8 *** 64.6 (48.7, 84.7) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.3, 6.7)
Glenn County 7,8 *** 62.1 (46.2, 81.9) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.6, 4.5)
Plumas County 7,8 *** 53.1 (38.4, 73.3) 9 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.5, 1.1)
San Benito County 7,8 *** 31.2 (22.0, 42.9) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.9, 2.8)
Inyo County 7,8 *** 43.0 (29.6, 61.9) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.6, 1.3)
Lassen County 7,8 *** 46.8 (32.1, 66.4) 7 stable stable trend -18.9 (-36.2, 3.1)
Mariposa County 7,8 *** 40.2 (27.6, 58.9) 7 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.0, 0.6)
Trinity County 7,8 *** 61.0 (40.2, 90.6) 6 falling falling trend -5.3 (-10.1, -0.2)
Colusa County 7,8 *** 51.1 (33.6, 74.4) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-5.6, 8.4)
Alpine County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Modoc County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/21/2017 5:01 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2016 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top