Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Colorado 6 1,173.8 (1,166.6, 1,181.0) N/A 21,340 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 1,328.9 (1,327.9, 1,329.8) N/A 1,494,912 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.5, 0.0)
Lincoln County 6 1,386.0 (1,169.7, 1,630.6) 2 (1, 37) 29 rising rising trend 12.2 (1.7, 22.5)
Summit County 6 803.7 (718.0, 897.2) 58 (45, 62) 80 stable stable trend 10.4 (-1.7, 20.4)
Larimer County 6 1,263.9 (1,234.7, 1,293.6) 6 (1, 13) 1,498 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.0, 5.1)
Weld County 6 1,223.6 (1,190.3, 1,257.7) 10 (4, 21) 1,083 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.5, 5.5)
Pueblo County 6 1,275.4 (1,236.6, 1,315.2) 5 (1, 13) 845 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 4.4)
Boulder County 6 1,155.6 (1,125.9, 1,185.9) 22 (12, 31) 1,206 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.9, 3.7)
Cheyenne County 6 1,422.0 (1,051.2, 1,878.9) 1 (1, 54) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.5)
Mesa County 6 1,252.2 (1,212.2, 1,293.3) 7 (2, 16) 773 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 2.9)
Mineral County 6 851.9 (504.8, 1,355.7) 54 (1, 62) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-6.3, 8.0)
Arapahoe County 6 1,159.0 (1,137.2, 1,181.2) 21 (14, 30) 2,274 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Jackson County 6 1,350.2 (982.2, 1,813.1) 3 (1, 60) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.4)
Montrose County 6 1,124.9 (1,058.5, 1,194.5) 26 (8, 41) 225 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 2.9)
Jefferson County 6 1,205.6 (1,184.3, 1,227.2) 11 (7, 22) 2,560 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Prowers County 6 1,284.2 (1,136.7, 1,445.6) 4 (1, 36) 58 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Kiowa County 6 1,189.3 (859.9, 1,610.3) 15 (1, 62) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 3.0)
Ouray County 6 1,077.8 (894.1, 1,288.3) 31 (2, 58) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 3.1)
Chaffee County 6 1,111.6 (1,020.0, 1,209.3) 28 (6, 45) 116 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Delta County 6 1,170.8 (1,093.7, 1,251.9) 19 (3, 37) 186 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.1)
Dolores County 6 912.3 (664.7, 1,222.5) 46 (2, 62) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.7, 4.5)
Baca County 6 1,229.6 (1,001.6, 1,494.1) 9 (1, 52) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 1.7)
Adams County 6 1,202.6 (1,174.9, 1,230.8) 12 (6, 24) 1,543 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Broomfield County 6 1,175.7 (1,111.0, 1,243.1) 18 (4, 35) 256 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
Denver County 6 1,187.9 (1,165.5, 1,210.6) 16 (8, 25) 2,239 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Garfield County 6 1,180.2 (1,107.7, 1,256.1) 17 (3, 36) 217 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.0, 0.0)
Morgan County 6 1,118.7 (1,025.5, 1,218.1) 27 (5, 44) 109 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
El Paso County 6 1,192.4 (1,171.0, 1,214.1) 14 (8, 24) 2,484 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Alamosa County 6 1,061.1 (933.8, 1,201.0) 35 (5, 53) 52 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.7)
Bent County 6 1,049.6 (863.9, 1,263.6) 38 (2, 60) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.7)
Las Animas County 6 1,019.2 (913.9, 1,133.4) 42 (16, 54) 72 stable stable trend -1.3 (-8.0, 0.5)
Washington County 6 1,050.4 (860.1, 1,270.3) 37 (2, 59) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 0.9)
Douglas County 6 1,160.1 (1,128.9, 1,191.9) 20 (11, 31) 1,154 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.7)
Otero County 6 1,199.3 (1,088.8, 1,317.9) 13 (2, 39) 90 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Grand County 6 904.4 (790.3, 1,030.3) 47 (31, 61) 56 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.8)
Sedgwick County 6 1,081.6 (841.2, 1,373.9) 30 (1, 61) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.6, 2.4)
Elbert County 6 1,082.9 (987.1, 1,185.5) 29 (7, 47) 111 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.8)
Fremont County 6 1,234.3 (1,167.7, 1,303.7) 8 (2, 27) 266 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.8, -0.4)
La Plata County 6 1,053.9 (990.9, 1,120.0) 36 (22, 46) 230 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Phillips County 6 1,075.6 (876.5, 1,307.0) 32 (2, 59) 22 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.3)
Yuma County 6 1,021.7 (880.9, 1,178.6) 40 (6, 58) 39 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Pitkin County 6 898.3 (802.6, 1,002.4) 50 (33, 61) 70 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.5)
Eagle County 6 898.3 (826.0, 975.3) 49 (38, 59) 139 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Lake County 6 833.7 (673.3, 1,021.4) 56 (30, 62) 21 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 1.4)
Routt County 6 1,067.5 (966.4, 1,176.2) 33 (10, 50) 95 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.4)
Logan County 6 1,021.5 (924.5, 1,125.8) 41 (17, 52) 84 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.3)
Rio Blanco County 6 1,134.9 (944.1, 1,353.1) 23 (1, 55) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.1)
Teller County 6 1,126.2 (1,033.8, 1,224.8) 25 (5, 43) 134 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -0.9)
Huerfano County 6 1,132.5 (978.6, 1,303.5) 24 (1, 51) 45 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.7)
Rio Grande County 6 1,012.6 (886.5, 1,151.9) 43 (10, 57) 49 falling falling trend -2.7 (-8.8, -1.3)
San Miguel County 6 1,062.6 (855.3, 1,303.2) 34 (2, 61) 25 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.3, 2.3)
Costilla County 6 817.3 (641.2, 1,026.9) 57 (29, 62) 16 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.5)
Crowley County 6 951.5 (756.7, 1,181.4) 45 (5, 62) 17 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.8)
Moffat County 6 1,038.9 (907.5, 1,184.0) 39 (7, 55) 48 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.6)
Montezuma County 6 904.3 (827.0, 986.8) 48 (37, 59) 108 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -2.1)
Park County 6 882.8 (782.5, 992.6) 51 (33, 61) 76 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.5)
Gunnison County 6 993.4 (867.5, 1,132.6) 44 (12, 59) 51 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.6)
Archuleta County 6 802.1 (705.8, 908.0) 59 (44, 62) 58 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.2, -1.6)
Conejos County 6 774.3 (645.1, 922.2) 61 (41, 62) 26 stable stable trend -4.5 (-22.0, 1.1)
Gilpin County 6 745.1 (584.8, 938.2) 62 (37, 62) 19 falling falling trend -6.2 (-9.5, -2.7)
Kit Carson County 6 863.2 (719.2, 1,027.9) 53 (28, 62) 26 falling falling trend -11.4 (-22.2, -4.1)
Clear Creek County 6 842.7 (722.8, 977.8) 55 (35, 62) 40 falling falling trend -12.8 (-21.8, -3.8)
Saguache County 6 779.5 (642.9, 937.1) 60 (38, 62) 26 falling falling trend -15.9 (-25.1, -7.3)
Custer County 6 877.7 (722.8, 1,056.7) 52 (22, 62) 28 falling falling trend -20.5 (-34.7, -5.1)
Hinsdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/13/2024 10:13 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top