Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 N/A 94.7 (93.3, 96.1) N/A 3,491 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Adams County 6 Urban 92.9 (88.4, 97.6) 21 (10, 31) 325 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Alamosa County 6 Rural 82.8 (57.5, 114.8) 31 (2, 43) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.7, 6.3)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 94.9 (90.8, 99.1) 18 (9, 29) 412 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
Archuleta County 6 Rural 81.0 (53.4, 118.1) 35 (2, 43) 5 stable stable trend -4.5 (-26.6, 1.6)
Boulder County 6 Urban 90.8 (84.9, 96.9) 26 (11, 34) 185 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 92.1 (80.6, 104.8) 23 (5, 37) 47 stable stable trend 1.5 (-6.8, 8.9)
Chaffee County 6 Rural 118.4 (91.0, 151.7) 3 (1, 35) 13 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 4.2)
Clear Creek County 6 Urban 69.0 (42.0, 108.3) 41 (4, 43) 4 stable stable trend 3.3 (-4.3, 11.8)
Delta County 6 Rural 87.5 (67.9, 110.9) 27 (3, 42) 14 stable stable trend -12.4 (-32.2, 0.2)
Denver County 6 Urban 92.9 (89.1, 96.8) 22 (12, 31) 477 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Douglas County 6 Urban 102.9 (97.3, 108.9) 7 (4, 21) 250 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Eagle County 6 Rural 82.0 (69.9, 95.6) 34 (12, 41) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-6.8, -0.1)
El Paso County 6 Urban 94.0 (89.9, 98.1) 20 (10, 30) 420 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Elbert County 6 Urban 92.5 (71.9, 117.4) 25 (2, 42) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.1, 3.9)
Fremont County 6 Rural 77.8 (64.3, 93.5) 36 (9, 42) 23 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -1.0)
Garfield County 6 Rural 100.5 (86.9, 115.6) 9 (3, 34) 39 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.1)
Grand County 6 Rural 63.0 (42.0, 90.9) 42 (15, 43) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.9, 4.4)
Gunnison County 6 Rural 97.0 (71.2, 128.8) 16 (1, 42) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.7, 6.2)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 96.8 (92.3, 101.4) 14 (7, 27) 356 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Kit Carson County 6 Rural 85.1 (48.5, 137.8) 30 (1, 43) 3 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.5, 5.3)
La Plata County 6 Rural 82.0 (68.9, 96.9) 33 (10, 42) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Lake County 6 Rural 94.9 (59.4, 143.6) 19 (1, 43) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.4, 0.3)
Larimer County 6 Urban 102.3 (96.2, 108.7) 8 (4, 23) 215 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.4)
Las Animas County 6 Rural 96.9 (67.7, 134.2) 17 (1, 43) 7 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.5, 8.0)
Logan County 6 Rural 70.3 (51.1, 94.3) 40 (10, 43) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.1)
Mesa County 6 Urban 98.3 (89.2, 108.1) 11 (4, 31) 86 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Moffat County 6 Rural 143.8 (108.2, 187.1) 1 (1, 27) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 5.1)
Montezuma County 6 Rural 76.3 (57.0, 100.1) 39 (6, 43) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.5)
Montrose County 6 Rural 113.2 (94.2, 134.9) 5 (1, 31) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Morgan County 6 Rural 78.8 (60.9, 100.2) 38 (6, 43) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.6, 3.8)
Otero County 6 Rural 88.3 (64.1, 118.4) 28 (2, 43) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.3)
Park County 6 Urban 118.0 (88.1, 155.1) 4 (1, 38) 11 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.0, 7.4)
Pitkin County 6 Rural 83.1 (60.7, 111.5) 32 (3, 43) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.5, 2.6)
Prowers County 6 Rural 120.8 (85.7, 165.1) 2 (1, 40) 8
*
*
Pueblo County 6 Urban 99.4 (90.6, 108.7) 10 (4, 31) 96 stable stable trend -0.7 (-8.6, 0.5)
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural 109.4 (65.7, 170.1) 6 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Rio Grande County 6 Rural 97.2 (65.5, 138.4) 15 (1, 43) 6
*
*
Routt County 6 Rural 93.0 (73.2, 116.7) 24 (2, 41) 15 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.1)
San Miguel County 6 Rural 87.0 (55.9, 130.4) 29 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.7, 3.0)
Summit County 6 Rural 80.3 (63.9, 99.7) 37 (7, 43) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.8, 1.9)
Teller County 6 Urban 98.2 (75.1, 126.3) 13 (1, 41) 12 falling falling trend -9.2 (-26.6, -1.8)
Weld County 6 Urban 98.2 (92.3, 104.5) 12 (6, 28) 205 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Yuma County 6 Rural 57.1 (32.5, 92.6) 43 (9, 43) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-6.8, 7.0)
Baca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huerfano County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 11:53 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Baca, Bent, Cheyenne, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Custer, Dolores, Gilpin, Hinsdale, Huerfano, Jackson, Kiowa, Lincoln, Mineral, Ouray, Phillips, Saguache, San Juan, Sedgwick, Washington

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top