Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 *** 387.3 (384.1, 390.5) N/A 12,012 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.5, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 422.7 (422.3, 423.2) N/A 843,265 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Kiowa County 6 *** 644.6 (412.9, 964.8) 1 (1, 49) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-3.1, 8.4)
Jackson County 6 *** 462.6 (265.9, 756.2) 2 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Phillips County 6 *** 447.7 (331.3, 592.0) 3 (1, 54) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.4)
Lincoln County 6 *** 436.3 (333.2, 563.1) 4 (1, 54) 14 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.9, 6.5)
Mesa County 6 *** 419.5 (400.7, 439.0) 5 (2, 21) 417 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.8)
Elbert County 6 *** 417.5 (369.0, 470.9) 6 (1, 37) 65 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Fremont County 6 *** 416.7 (382.0, 454.1) 7 (2, 35) 132 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Cheyenne County 6 *** 407.5 (242.5, 642.9) 8 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.6, 7.9)
Douglas County 6 *** 402.8 (388.9, 417.0) 9 (4, 26) 689 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Jefferson County 6 *** 401.6 (392.1, 411.3) 10 (5, 25) 1,450 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.0)
Denver County 6 *** 401.0 (391.4, 410.7) 11 (5, 25) 1,402 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
Adams County 6 *** 400.9 (389.3, 412.8) 12 (5, 26) 935 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
El Paso County 6 *** 395.5 (386.2, 405.0) 13 (7, 28) 1,439 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Arapahoe County 6 *** 394.6 (385.2, 404.2) 14 (7, 28) 1,393 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
Chaffee County 6 *** 393.4 (343.0, 450.1) 15 (2, 46) 56 stable stable trend -10.6 (-22.5, 3.2)
Larimer County 6 *** 393.4 (380.5, 406.6) 16 (6, 30) 766 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Broomfield County 6 *** 392.4 (364.1, 422.4) 17 (4, 36) 147 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Logan County 6 *** 390.2 (339.2, 447.0) 18 (2, 47) 49 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Baca County 6 *** 387.3 (279.7, 527.3) 19 (1, 60) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.6, 5.1)
Garfield County 6 *** 386.6 (355.1, 420.1) 20 (4, 40) 120 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Prowers County 6 *** 386.1 (323.9, 457.3) 21 (2, 52) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.1)
Delta County 6 *** 382.5 (343.5, 425.2) 22 (3, 44) 91 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Teller County 6 *** 382.1 (337.0, 432.2) 23 (2, 46) 66 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Weld County 6 *** 381.9 (367.7, 396.6) 24 (11, 35) 569 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Pueblo County 6 *** 379.6 (362.6, 397.1) 25 (9, 36) 416 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.9, 1.6)
Montrose County 6 *** 378.2 (345.5, 413.3) 26 (4, 42) 115 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Yuma County 6 *** 375.5 (308.4, 453.4) 27 (2, 55) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.6)
Las Animas County 6 *** 374.6 (317.4, 439.9) 28 (2, 52) 38 stable stable trend 2.2 (0.0, 4.4)
Kit Carson County 6 *** 374.1 (296.1, 467.4) 29 (2, 57) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.3)
Morgan County 6 *** 372.2 (330.0, 418.3) 30 (3, 48) 60 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.0)
Boulder County 6 *** 370.1 (357.3, 383.3) 31 (18, 38) 664 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Crowley County 6 *** 369.5 (261.2, 513.0) 32 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.6)
Ouray County 6 *** 365.1 (264.6, 495.4) 33 (1, 60) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.3, 2.1)
Alamosa County 6 *** 363.2 (303.9, 430.5) 34 (2, 55) 29 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.8)
Moffat County 6 *** 351.8 (291.4, 421.3) 35 (3, 57) 26 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.7)
Clear Creek County 6 *** 344.9 (277.5, 425.7) 36 (3, 58) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.7)
Rio Blanco County 6 *** 341.6 (260.7, 440.7) 37 (2, 61) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.0)
Washington County 6 *** 338.6 (248.8, 452.5) 38 (2, 61) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.3, 2.3)
Gunnison County 6 *** 329.2 (273.2, 393.7) 39 (5, 58) 27 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.8, 0.1)
La Plata County 6 *** 325.7 (297.9, 355.6) 40 (26, 54) 112 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Routt County 6 *** 324.3 (280.2, 373.6) 41 (16, 58) 44 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.8)
Otero County 6 *** 321.8 (278.0, 371.1) 42 (16, 57) 43 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Archuleta County 6 *** 321.6 (268.3, 383.8) 43 (8, 59) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Rio Grande County 6 *** 314.0 (256.8, 380.9) 44 (8, 60) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.5)
Park County 6 *** 311.5 (259.6, 371.7) 45 (13, 59) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.6)
Pitkin County 6 *** 310.6 (263.7, 364.1) 46 (19, 59) 36 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.0)
Custer County 6 *** 304.2 (220.9, 417.9) 47 (3, 61) 14 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.8, 0.1)
Lake County 6 *** 303.2 (225.8, 398.7) 48 (4, 61) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.5, 4.0)
Eagle County 6 *** 302.4 (269.8, 337.8) 49 (32, 58) 75 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Montezuma County 6 *** 293.0 (256.9, 333.2) 50 (33, 59) 55 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.7)
Grand County 6 *** 290.1 (238.0, 350.9) 51 (22, 61) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 2.0)
San Miguel County 6 *** 289.2 (209.5, 389.7) 52 (5, 61) 11 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.8, -0.5)
Huerfano County 6 *** 287.0 (225.3, 366.2) 53 (16, 61) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.7)
Bent County 6 *** 272.7 (188.1, 385.8) 54 (5, 61) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.1, 1.5)
Saguache County 6 *** 267.4 (198.1, 355.1) 55 (18, 61) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.6, 2.3)
Dolores County 6 *** 265.0 (144.7, 451.4) 56 (2, 61) 3
*
*
Gilpin County 6 *** 262.2 (184.6, 364.8) 57 (6, 61) 10 falling falling trend -6.5 (-10.2, -2.7)
Conejos County 6 *** 257.4 (196.8, 331.9) 58 (31, 61) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.6, 4.1)
Sedgwick County 6 *** 249.1 (149.3, 398.5) 59 (4, 61) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.7, 5.1)
Summit County 6 *** 236.8 (200.4, 278.1) 60 (47, 61) 37 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.6)
Costilla County 6 *** 235.1 (152.8, 351.3) 61 (11, 61) 7 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.8, 0.6)
Hinsdale County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/16/2022 3:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top