Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

White (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 *** 395.5 (393.1, 397.9) N/A 21,840 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 451.0 (450.7, 451.4) N/A 1,419,027 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Kiowa County 6 *** 510.3 (366.3, 697.0) 1 (1, 57) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.8, 4.7)
Cheyenne County 6 *** 452.4 (329.6, 607.9) 2 (1, 60) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.5)
Phillips County 6 *** 430.2 (350.8, 523.1) 3 (1, 54) 25 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
Mesa County 6 *** 421.1 (407.6, 434.9) 4 (1, 19) 801 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Larimer County 6 *** 417.2 (407.6, 427.0) 5 (2, 17) 1,529 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.4, 2.6)
El Paso County 6 *** 417.0 (409.6, 424.4) 6 (2, 16) 2,584 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.0, -1.0)
Garfield County 6 *** 416.8 (392.8, 441.9) 7 (1, 29) 247 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Pueblo County 6 *** 412.0 (399.0, 425.3) 8 (2, 24) 824 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Lincoln County 6 *** 411.2 (342.8, 490.1) 9 (1, 55) 27 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.2)
Prowers County 6 *** 410.9 (363.9, 462.6) 10 (1, 42) 60 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Fremont County 6 *** 407.3 (384.8, 430.8) 11 (2, 33) 272 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Weld County 6 *** 406.0 (395.2, 417.0) 12 (4, 25) 1,133 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Denver County 6 *** 404.9 (397.2, 412.7) 13 (6, 24) 2,227 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Adams County 6 *** 400.6 (391.6, 409.7) 14 (7, 28) 1,604 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Jefferson County 6 *** 399.6 (392.6, 406.7) 15 (9, 27) 2,662 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Arapahoe County 6 *** 398.3 (390.7, 406.0) 16 (8, 28) 2,217 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Morgan County 6 *** 394.8 (363.5, 428.2) 17 (2, 40) 123 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Teller County 6 *** 393.6 (360.6, 429.1) 18 (2, 42) 136 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Douglas County 6 *** 391.1 (380.7, 401.7) 19 (11, 32) 1,193 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Baca County 6 *** 389.9 (311.2, 484.5) 20 (1, 60) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Montrose County 6 *** 389.7 (366.0, 414.6) 21 (3, 39) 232 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Chaffee County 6 *** 389.5 (355.6, 426.4) 22 (2, 44) 115 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Boulder County 6 *** 388.7 (378.9, 398.7) 23 (13, 33) 1,267 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.5, 5.4)
Broomfield County 6 *** 388.5 (367.0, 410.9) 24 (5, 38) 255 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Delta County 6 *** 384.7 (357.4, 413.6) 25 (4, 43) 181 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Moffat County 6 *** 380.9 (335.8, 430.5) 26 (2, 52) 56 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Yuma County 6 *** 377.4 (329.3, 430.9) 27 (2, 55) 47 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.8)
Ouray County 6 *** 376.2 (307.5, 458.3) 28 (1, 60) 29 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.2)
Jackson County 6 *** 374.5 (253.8, 539.4) 29 (1, 63) 7 rising rising trend 29.6 (3.0, 63.1)
Alamosa County 6 *** 370.2 (326.1, 418.6) 30 (2, 55) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Logan County 6 *** 369.9 (336.7, 405.8) 31 (5, 50) 97 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Elbert County 6 *** 367.6 (334.9, 402.9) 32 (6, 52) 114 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Las Animas County 6 *** 366.8 (327.2, 410.5) 33 (3, 54) 74 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.3)
Washington County 6 *** 364.1 (301.2, 437.8) 34 (1, 60) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.3)
Mineral County 6 *** 363.3 (206.7, 615.7) 35 (1, 63) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-9.0, 6.7)
Kit Carson County 6 *** 355.9 (302.8, 416.3) 36 (2, 59) 34 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Otero County 6 *** 351.2 (317.4, 388.1) 37 (13, 55) 86 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Rio Blanco County 6 *** 350.2 (290.7, 418.7) 38 (2, 61) 26 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
Clear Creek County 6 *** 347.7 (301.2, 400.6) 39 (4, 59) 49 falling falling trend -15.0 (-26.6, -1.6)
Sedgwick County 6 *** 346.1 (259.2, 457.1) 40 (1, 63) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.8)
Gunnison County 6 *** 341.7 (300.5, 387.1) 41 (10, 59) 57 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.8)
Routt County 6 *** 338.8 (306.7, 373.5) 42 (23, 57) 95 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.5)
Pitkin County 6 *** 337.7 (303.4, 375.2) 43 (20, 58) 82 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
La Plata County 6 *** 335.9 (315.1, 357.7) 44 (30, 55) 219 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.8, -1.6)
Huerfano County 6 *** 330.8 (281.7, 388.7) 45 (9, 61) 42 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.6)
San Miguel County 6 *** 330.6 (267.8, 403.6) 46 (3, 63) 26 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.0, -0.5)
Eagle County 6 *** 326.0 (301.7, 351.7) 47 (31, 58) 165 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Hinsdale County 6 *** 325.1 (181.8, 556.4) 48 (1, 63) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-9.9, 3.9)
Saguache County 6 *** 317.0 (261.9, 381.5) 49 (12, 63) 30 stable stable trend -16.4 (-35.3, 8.1)
Park County 6 *** 316.0 (279.6, 356.3) 50 (27, 61) 76 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Rio Grande County 6 *** 314.8 (274.3, 360.2) 51 (27, 62) 48 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.3)
Montezuma County 6 *** 313.1 (285.1, 343.6) 52 (32, 60) 108 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.4, -3.4)
Crowley County 6 *** 312.2 (250.4, 386.4) 53 (7, 63) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.4)
Bent County 6 *** 311.9 (254.4, 380.2) 54 (10, 63) 22 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Grand County 6 *** 311.5 (272.7, 354.6) 55 (28, 62) 57 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Custer County 6 *** 311.5 (255.6, 380.5) 56 (11, 63) 31 falling falling trend -9.5 (-15.2, -3.3)
Archuleta County 6 *** 305.0 (266.7, 347.9) 57 (30, 62) 60 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Lake County 6 *** 275.5 (222.8, 337.1) 58 (30, 63) 21 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 1.1)
Dolores County 6 *** 275.1 (186.0, 396.1) 59 (3, 63) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.0, 3.1)
Gilpin County 6 *** 271.5 (213.0, 342.6) 60 (27, 63) 21 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.1, -2.3)
Costilla County 6 *** 268.3 (206.7, 346.3) 61 (29, 63) 16 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.2, -1.1)
Conejos County 6 *** 265.9 (221.2, 317.8) 62 (39, 63) 27 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.4)
Summit County 6 *** 244.4 (217.9, 273.3) 63 (56, 63) 79 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -1.0)
San Juan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/21/2022 2:09 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top