Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 355.2 (349.1, 361.4) N/A 2,862 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) § 1 352.6 (351.8, 353.5) N/A 144,674 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
Teller County 6 421.5 (233.6, 683.7) 1 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Pueblo County 6 403.8 (382.6, 425.9) 2 (1, 14) 283 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Fremont County 6 386.8 (307.6, 479.4) 3 (1, 33) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.5)
Jefferson County 6 386.0 (363.5, 409.5) 4 (1, 18) 246 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Yuma County 6 383.3 (219.7, 612.8) 5 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Weld County 6 383.2 (358.5, 409.1) 6 (1, 20) 209 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Boulder County 6 382.8 (347.3, 420.6) 7 (1, 23) 101 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Otero County 6 381.9 (322.2, 449.4) 8 (1, 29) 30 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.0)
Larimer County 6 381.4 (344.2, 421.2) 9 (1, 24) 89 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Chaffee County 6 377.3 (254.5, 537.3) 10 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 4.6)
El Paso County 6 372.8 (351.1, 395.4) 11 (3, 21) 253 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Las Animas County 6 372.6 (311.2, 443.2) 12 (1, 31) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Denver County 6 366.0 (351.6, 380.9) 13 (6, 21) 531 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Elbert County 6 365.6 (208.1, 584.3) 14 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Montrose County 6 356.4 (290.1, 432.6) 15 (1, 34) 23 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.5, 1.0)
Mesa County 6 356.0 (313.8, 402.1) 16 (2, 29) 55 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Douglas County 6 355.0 (310.8, 403.3) 17 (2, 30) 62 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.7)
Broomfield County 6 351.8 (274.3, 442.7) 18 (1, 37) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.2, 3.5)
Huerfano County 6 348.6 (262.5, 457.6) 19 (1, 37) 12 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.4)
La Plata County 6 348.3 (276.9, 431.3) 20 (1, 36) 18 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.4)
Adams County 6 339.0 (323.3, 355.2) 21 (12, 27) 414 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Prowers County 6 338.0 (252.0, 442.3) 22 (1, 39) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 3.8)
Alamosa County 6 323.7 (262.3, 394.7) 23 (2, 37) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.6)
Arapahoe County 6 319.2 (298.5, 340.9) 24 (15, 32) 227 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Montezuma County 6 312.9 (227.0, 419.9) 25 (1, 40) 9 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.6, -0.5)
Garfield County 6 309.6 (242.6, 387.3) 26 (2, 39) 24 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.8, 6.5)
Park County 6 298.1 (156.7, 522.2) 27 (1, 40) 3
*
*
Rio Grande County 6 298.0 (233.8, 374.4) 28 (4, 39) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.3)
Morgan County 6 283.8 (228.1, 348.4) 29 (10, 39) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 2.0)
Delta County 6 277.2 (204.8, 365.9) 30 (5, 40) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.5)
Moffat County 6 272.2 (162.7, 425.9) 31 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Conejos County 6 271.3 (211.2, 344.6) 32 (12, 40) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.3)
Costilla County 6 269.6 (196.8, 364.9) 33 (6, 40) 10 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.4, -1.4)
Logan County 6 265.7 (177.3, 380.5) 34 (3, 40) 6 stable stable trend -4.5 (-9.3, 0.5)
Bent County 6 260.3 (164.0, 393.0) 35 (2, 40) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.1, -0.1)
Saguache County 6 257.7 (167.1, 378.5) 36 (3, 40) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.4, 1.3)
Archuleta County 6 257.4 (168.4, 375.2) 37 (2, 40) 6 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.7, -1.0)
Lake County 6 249.9 (160.8, 369.2) 38 (3, 40) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.1, 4.2)
Summit County 6 239.0 (92.6, 470.8) 39 (1, 40) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-11.0, 8.7)
Eagle County 6 220.5 (165.0, 286.9) 40 (24, 40) 19 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.7, 2.4)
Baca County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gunnison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pitkin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Routt County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/28/2023 8:43 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top