Incidence Rates Table
Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County
All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65
Sorted by Rate
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado 6 | N/A | 194.3 (192.6, 196.0) | N/A | 11,090 |
falling 
|
-0.5 (-0.7, -0.4) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) | N/A | 734,330 |
stable 
|
-0.3 (-1.7, 0.0) |
| Saguache County 6 | Rural | 106.8 (74.2, 151.0) | 61 (43, 61) | 9 |
falling
|
-14.2 (-38.3, -1.1) |
| Crowley County 6 | Rural | 110.4 (76.3, 158.0) | 60 (37, 61) | 7 |
falling
|
-3.6 (-6.6, -1.1) |
| Gilpin County 6 | Urban | 124.1 (86.4, 175.5) | 59 (17, 61) | 10 |
falling
|
-3.2 (-5.9, -0.7) |
| Grand County 6 | Rural | 127.8 (104.3, 155.8) | 58 (41, 61) | 25 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-4.1, 0.5) |
| San Miguel County 6 | Rural | 128.6 (96.5, 169.2) | 57 (29, 61) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-3.3, 1.5) |
| Conejos County 6 | Rural | 134.0 (97.9, 179.6) | 56 (15, 61) | 10 |
stable
|
-2.0 (-6.0, 1.6) |
| Yuma County 6 | Rural | 140.5 (108.0, 180.1) | 55 (18, 61) | 14 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-5.1, 2.9) |
| Sedgwick County 6 | Rural | 143.0 (83.2, 236.0) | 54 (2, 61) | 4 |
falling
|
-3.7 (-7.9, -0.4) |
| Clear Creek County 6 | Urban | 151.0 (119.7, 189.6) | 53 (13, 61) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.5, 1.8) |
| Eagle County 6 | Rural | 153.4 (139.4, 168.5) | 52 (35, 57) | 91 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.6, 0.2) |
| Dolores County 6 | Rural | 155.8 (88.5, 258.8) | 51 (1, 61) | 4 |
|
|
| Archuleta County 6 | Rural | 159.0 (128.9, 194.9) | 50 (10, 60) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-3.0, 1.4) |
| Baca County 6 | Rural | 161.0 (108.7, 233.5) | 49 (2, 61) | 7 |
stable
|
0.3 (-3.1, 3.7) |
| Summit County 6 | Rural | 161.9 (142.6, 183.3) | 48 (24, 57) | 55 |
stable
|
5.0 (-1.1, 17.5) |
| Pitkin County 6 | Rural | 162.1 (136.9, 191.3) | 47 (12, 58) | 33 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.3, 0.4) |
| Logan County 6 | Rural | 163.8 (139.6, 191.1) | 46 (11, 58) | 36 |
falling
|
-11.9 (-25.8, -2.0) |
| Kit Carson County 6 | Rural | 165.5 (123.8, 217.3) | 45 (4, 60) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-3.0, 2.1) |
| Lake County 6 | Rural | 168.7 (128.2, 218.5) | 44 (4, 60) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-3.6, 2.1) |
| Custer County 6 | Rural | 169.7 (113.6, 246.8) | 43 (2, 61) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-4.7, 3.0) |
| Ouray County 6 | Rural | 170.7 (120.3, 239.0) | 42 (3, 61) | 10 |
stable
|
0.4 (-2.3, 2.9) |
| Bent County 6 | Rural | 171.0 (126.8, 227.5) | 41 (2, 61) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.5, 2.4) |
| Morgan County 6 | Rural | 172.5 (150.7, 196.6) | 40 (10, 55) | 49 |
stable
|
-12.5 (-27.4, 1.5) |
| Montezuma County 6 | Rural | 173.4 (150.7, 198.9) | 39 (10, 55) | 50 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-3.0, -0.2) |
| Washington County 6 | Rural | 174.1 (122.5, 241.2) | 38 (2, 61) | 8 |
stable
|
-2.2 (-6.3, 1.6) |
| Gunnison County 6 | Rural | 175.3 (146.3, 208.7) | 37 (6, 57) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-3.0, 3.0) |
| La Plata County 6 | Rural | 176.1 (160.8, 192.6) | 36 (14, 51) | 111 |
stable
|
1.7 (-2.0, 6.2) |
| Rio Blanco County 6 | Rural | 177.2 (130.7, 235.1) | 35 (3, 60) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-3.5, 2.1) |
| Elbert County 6 | Urban | 177.4 (155.4, 202.0) | 34 (8, 53) | 57 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.1, 0.7) |
| Lincoln County 6 | Rural | 179.3 (133.6, 237.1) | 33 (2, 60) | 11 |
stable
|
2.2 (-0.6, 5.6) |
| Routt County 6 | Rural | 181.0 (158.4, 206.3) | 32 (6, 53) | 51 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.6, 1.2) |
| Fremont County 6 | Rural | 188.2 (171.4, 206.4) | 31 (7, 47) | 103 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-5.4, -0.7) |
| Boulder County 6 | Urban | 189.2 (182.3, 196.2) | 30 (14, 39) | 618 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
| Garfield County 6 | Rural | 189.5 (174.1, 205.9) | 29 (7, 45) | 119 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.5, 1.4) |
| Park County 6 | Urban | 191.3 (161.9, 225.3) | 28 (4, 52) | 41 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.9, 2.0) |
| Broomfield County 6 | Urban | 191.9 (177.7, 207.0) | 27 (7, 43) | 139 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.7, 1.0) |
| Teller County 6 | Urban | 192.4 (168.1, 219.6) | 26 (4, 51) | 61 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.8, 1.4) |
| Rio Grande County 6 | Rural | 193.0 (156.5, 235.9) | 25 (2, 55) | 22 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.3, 2.4) |
| Chaffee County 6 | Rural | 193.3 (165.4, 225.2) | 24 (3, 51) | 41 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.1, 1.3) |
| Arapahoe County 6 | Urban | 194.4 (189.5, 199.3) | 23 (12, 35) | 1,264 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-3.0, -0.5) |
| Adams County 6 | Urban | 194.7 (189.1, 200.4) | 22 (11, 35) | 947 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-0.7, 0.0) |
| Weld County 6 | Urban | 195.2 (188.1, 202.5) | 21 (10, 35) | 598 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.7, 0.3) |
| El Paso County 6 | Urban | 195.2 (190.4, 200.1) | 20 (12, 33) | 1,337 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-3.2, -0.9) |
| Jefferson County 6 | Urban | 195.9 (190.8, 201.1) | 19 (10, 33) | 1,225 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-0.8, -0.3) |
| Alamosa County 6 | Rural | 195.9 (163.4, 233.0) | 18 (2, 53) | 28 |
stable
|
1.4 (-1.1, 4.2) |
| Denver County 6 | Urban | 196.9 (192.0, 201.9) | 17 (10, 32) | 1,269 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.5) |
| Douglas County 6 | Urban | 198.0 (191.5, 204.6) | 16 (9, 33) | 733 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.3, 0.0) |
| Mesa County 6 | Urban | 199.3 (188.9, 210.1) | 15 (7, 35) | 312 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.3, 0.0) |
| Delta County 6 | Rural | 199.6 (176.6, 225.1) | 14 (4, 46) | 66 |
falling
|
-9.5 (-18.7, -4.8) |
| Las Animas County 6 | Rural | 203.4 (170.3, 241.6) | 13 (2, 50) | 32 |
rising 
|
1.9 (0.1, 3.8) |
| Montrose County 6 | Rural | 204.3 (184.2, 226.2) | 12 (3, 40) | 89 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.8, 1.1) |
| Larimer County 6 | Urban | 206.9 (199.8, 214.3) | 11 (5, 22) | 695 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-4.8, 0.6) |
| Costilla County 6 | Rural | 208.7 (143.7, 296.3) | 10 (1, 60) | 9 |
stable
|
4.4 (-11.2, 23.8) |
| Huerfano County 6 | Rural | 210.2 (159.9, 273.1) | 9 (1, 55) | 16 |
stable
|
1.7 (-2.2, 5.5) |
| Moffat County 6 | Rural | 216.3 (179.9, 257.9) | 8 (1, 47) | 28 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.2, 0.2) |
| Phillips County 6 | Rural | 218.3 (155.9, 298.0) | 7 (1, 57) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-4.0, 2.2) |
| Pueblo County 6 | Urban | 221.0 (210.6, 231.7) | 6 (3, 15) | 376 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-4.8, 1.0) |
| Otero County 6 | Rural | 224.8 (193.6, 259.8) | 5 (1, 38) | 41 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.7, 1.8) |
| Kiowa County 6 | Rural | 225.1 (118.8, 391.2) | 4 (1, 61) | 3 |
|
|
| Prowers County 6 | Rural | 258.7 (215.9, 307.5) | 3 (1, 29) | 29 |
rising
|
5.7 (1.6, 17.1) |
| Cheyenne County 6 | Rural | 272.7 (165.5, 425.1) | 2 (1, 59) | 5 |
stable
|
2.0 (-2.5, 7.0) |
| Jackson County 6 | Rural | 311.1 (190.7, 488.5) | 1 (1, 56) | 5 |
|
|
| Hinsdale County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mineral County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| San Juan County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/01/2025 9:33 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Hinsdale, Mineral, San Juan
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/01/2025 9:33 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Hinsdale, Mineral, San Juan
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.