Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 N/A 194.3 (192.6, 196.0) N/A 11,090 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Adams County 6 Urban 194.7 (189.1, 200.4) 22 (11, 35) 947 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 194.4 (189.5, 199.3) 23 (12, 35) 1,264 falling falling trend -0.9 (-3.0, -0.5)
Boulder County 6 Urban 189.2 (182.3, 196.2) 30 (14, 39) 618 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 191.9 (177.7, 207.0) 27 (7, 43) 139 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Clear Creek County 6 Urban 151.0 (119.7, 189.6) 53 (13, 61) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.8)
Denver County 6 Urban 196.9 (192.0, 201.9) 17 (10, 32) 1,269 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Douglas County 6 Urban 198.0 (191.5, 204.6) 16 (9, 33) 733 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
El Paso County 6 Urban 195.2 (190.4, 200.1) 20 (12, 33) 1,337 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.2, -0.9)
Elbert County 6 Urban 177.4 (155.4, 202.0) 34 (8, 53) 57 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Gilpin County 6 Urban 124.1 (86.4, 175.5) 59 (17, 61) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.7)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 195.9 (190.8, 201.1) 19 (10, 33) 1,225 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Larimer County 6 Urban 206.9 (199.8, 214.3) 11 (5, 22) 695 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.8, 0.6)
Mesa County 6 Urban 199.3 (188.9, 210.1) 15 (7, 35) 312 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Park County 6 Urban 191.3 (161.9, 225.3) 28 (4, 52) 41 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.0)
Pueblo County 6 Urban 221.0 (210.6, 231.7) 6 (3, 15) 376 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.8, 1.0)
Teller County 6 Urban 192.4 (168.1, 219.6) 26 (4, 51) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.4)
Weld County 6 Urban 195.2 (188.1, 202.5) 21 (10, 35) 598 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Alamosa County 6 Rural 195.9 (163.4, 233.0) 18 (2, 53) 28 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.2)
Archuleta County 6 Rural 159.0 (128.9, 194.9) 50 (10, 60) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.4)
Baca County 6 Rural 161.0 (108.7, 233.5) 49 (2, 61) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.7)
Bent County 6 Rural 171.0 (126.8, 227.5) 41 (2, 61) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.4)
Chaffee County 6 Rural 193.3 (165.4, 225.2) 24 (3, 51) 41 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Cheyenne County 6 Rural 272.7 (165.5, 425.1) 2 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.5, 7.0)
Conejos County 6 Rural 134.0 (97.9, 179.6) 56 (15, 61) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.0, 1.6)
Costilla County 6 Rural 208.7 (143.7, 296.3) 10 (1, 60) 9 stable stable trend 4.4 (-11.2, 23.8)
Crowley County 6 Rural 110.4 (76.3, 158.0) 60 (37, 61) 7 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.6, -1.1)
Custer County 6 Rural 169.7 (113.6, 246.8) 43 (2, 61) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 3.0)
Delta County 6 Rural 199.6 (176.6, 225.1) 14 (4, 46) 66 falling falling trend -9.5 (-18.7, -4.8)
Dolores County 6 Rural 155.8 (88.5, 258.8) 51 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Eagle County 6 Rural 153.4 (139.4, 168.5) 52 (35, 57) 91 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Fremont County 6 Rural 188.2 (171.4, 206.4) 31 (7, 47) 103 falling falling trend -1.6 (-5.4, -0.7)
Garfield County 6 Rural 189.5 (174.1, 205.9) 29 (7, 45) 119 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Grand County 6 Rural 127.8 (104.3, 155.8) 58 (41, 61) 25 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.5)
Gunnison County 6 Rural 175.3 (146.3, 208.7) 37 (6, 57) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 3.0)
Huerfano County 6 Rural 210.2 (159.9, 273.1) 9 (1, 55) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.2, 5.5)
Jackson County 6 Rural 311.1 (190.7, 488.5) 1 (1, 56) 5
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural 225.1 (118.8, 391.2) 4 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Kit Carson County 6 Rural 165.5 (123.8, 217.3) 45 (4, 60) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.1)
La Plata County 6 Rural 176.1 (160.8, 192.6) 36 (14, 51) 111 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.0, 6.2)
Lake County 6 Rural 168.7 (128.2, 218.5) 44 (4, 60) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.1)
Las Animas County 6 Rural 203.4 (170.3, 241.6) 13 (2, 50) 32 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.8)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 179.3 (133.6, 237.1) 33 (2, 60) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 5.6)
Logan County 6 Rural 163.8 (139.6, 191.1) 46 (11, 58) 36 falling falling trend -11.9 (-25.8, -2.0)
Moffat County 6 Rural 216.3 (179.9, 257.9) 8 (1, 47) 28 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Montezuma County 6 Rural 173.4 (150.7, 198.9) 39 (10, 55) 50 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.2)
Montrose County 6 Rural 204.3 (184.2, 226.2) 12 (3, 40) 89 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.1)
Morgan County 6 Rural 172.5 (150.7, 196.6) 40 (10, 55) 49 stable stable trend -12.5 (-27.4, 1.5)
Otero County 6 Rural 224.8 (193.6, 259.8) 5 (1, 38) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Ouray County 6 Rural 170.7 (120.3, 239.0) 42 (3, 61) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 2.9)
Phillips County 6 Rural 218.3 (155.9, 298.0) 7 (1, 57) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.2)
Pitkin County 6 Rural 162.1 (136.9, 191.3) 47 (12, 58) 33 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Prowers County 6 Rural 258.7 (215.9, 307.5) 3 (1, 29) 29 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.6, 17.1)
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural 177.2 (130.7, 235.1) 35 (3, 60) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.1)
Rio Grande County 6 Rural 193.0 (156.5, 235.9) 25 (2, 55) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.4)
Routt County 6 Rural 181.0 (158.4, 206.3) 32 (6, 53) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Saguache County 6 Rural 106.8 (74.2, 151.0) 61 (43, 61) 9 falling falling trend -14.2 (-38.3, -1.1)
San Miguel County 6 Rural 128.6 (96.5, 169.2) 57 (29, 61) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.5)
Sedgwick County 6 Rural 143.0 (83.2, 236.0) 54 (2, 61) 4 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.9, -0.4)
Summit County 6 Rural 161.9 (142.6, 183.3) 48 (24, 57) 55 stable stable trend 5.0 (-1.1, 17.5)
Washington County 6 Rural 174.1 (122.5, 241.2) 38 (2, 61) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 1.6)
Yuma County 6 Rural 140.5 (108.0, 180.1) 55 (18, 61) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 2.9)
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 3:41 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top