Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 N/A 1,784.2 (1,770.8, 1,797.7) N/A 14,187 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,975.2 (1,973.5, 1,977.0) N/A 1,010,129 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Alamosa County 6 Rural 1,314.3 (1,111.6, 1,543.5) 54 (30, 62) 31 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.7, -3.1)
Archuleta County 6 Rural 1,369.0 (1,185.7, 1,573.2) 50 (29, 61) 46 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.4)
Baca County 6 Rural 1,926.7 (1,529.8, 2,394.5) 7 (1, 54) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.1)
Bent County 6 Rural 1,229.7 (946.8, 1,570.7) 58 (21, 62) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.2)
Chaffee County 6 Rural 1,935.3 (1,755.7, 2,128.4) 6 (1, 32) 90 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Cheyenne County 6 Rural 2,276.1 (1,612.8, 3,115.3) 1 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 4.9)
Conejos County 6 Rural 1,268.5 (1,012.0, 1,570.3) 57 (26, 62) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.2)
Costilla County 6 Rural 1,072.5 (783.6, 1,434.7) 62 (34, 62) 10 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.7, -0.5)
Crowley County 6 Rural 1,599.6 (1,215.5, 2,067.1) 35 (1, 62) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.0)
Custer County 6 Rural 1,385.5 (1,103.2, 1,718.2) 49 (9, 62) 19 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.3, 0.2)
Delta County 6 Rural 1,712.2 (1,584.6, 1,847.4) 29 (8, 41) 136 falling falling trend -7.8 (-13.8, -1.8)
Dolores County 6 Rural 1,638.6 (1,188.2, 2,204.8) 32 (1, 62) 9
*
*
Eagle County 6 Rural 1,425.7 (1,286.9, 1,575.9) 47 (30, 59) 93 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.4)
Fremont County 6 Rural 1,759.6 (1,646.3, 1,878.7) 23 (5, 37) 184 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.9, -1.8)
Garfield County 6 Rural 1,784.3 (1,649.4, 1,927.5) 19 (4, 37) 141 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Grand County 6 Rural 1,460.9 (1,236.2, 1,714.8) 42 (14, 60) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 2.4)
Gunnison County 6 Rural 1,436.7 (1,202.7, 1,703.6) 45 (12, 61) 31 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -1.9)
Huerfano County 6 Rural 1,643.4 (1,403.7, 1,912.7) 31 (3, 56) 34 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -1.8)
Jackson County 6 Rural 2,017.9 (1,370.0, 2,872.8) 3 (1, 62) 6
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural 2,207.3 (1,539.1, 3,063.9) 2 (1, 58) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.8, 1.5)
Kit Carson County 6 Rural 1,496.5 (1,218.3, 1,818.5) 39 (5, 62) 20 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
La Plata County 6 Rural 1,731.6 (1,610.5, 1,859.4) 28 (6, 39) 167 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.4, 9.3)
Lake County 6 Rural 1,299.3 (985.6, 1,684.8) 55 (13, 62) 13 stable stable trend -3.5 (-26.8, 5.6)
Las Animas County 6 Rural 1,459.8 (1,284.3, 1,652.7) 43 (24, 59) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 1,992.1 (1,609.9, 2,436.6) 4 (1, 48) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-19.4, 3.9)
Logan County 6 Rural 1,487.7 (1,315.9, 1,675.4) 40 (20, 58) 56 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.6, 7.2)
Mineral County 6 Rural 1,362.4 (757.1, 2,258.6) 52 (1, 62) 3
*
*
Moffat County 6 Rural 1,520.4 (1,282.8, 1,789.7) 38 (7, 60) 31 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.3)
Montezuma County 6 Rural 1,400.8 (1,262.5, 1,550.1) 48 (32, 59) 79 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.5)
Montrose County 6 Rural 1,648.5 (1,536.8, 1,766.2) 30 (14, 44) 164 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 4.0)
Morgan County 6 Rural 1,621.3 (1,456.8, 1,799.2) 34 (9, 50) 73 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.2)
Otero County 6 Rural 1,579.6 (1,403.7, 1,771.3) 36 (11, 54) 59 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.3)
Ouray County 6 Rural 1,787.7 (1,443.7, 2,189.7) 17 (1, 56) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 3.4)
Phillips County 6 Rural 1,432.0 (1,116.3, 1,809.4) 46 (4, 62) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.7, -0.2)
Pitkin County 6 Rural 1,209.0 (1,043.3, 1,394.3) 60 (40, 62) 42 falling falling trend -13.7 (-27.4, -1.0)
Prowers County 6 Rural 1,737.0 (1,488.7, 2,014.9) 25 (2, 53) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural 1,634.9 (1,293.6, 2,038.9) 33 (1, 61) 16 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.5, 0.0)
Rio Grande County 6 Rural 1,366.0 (1,158.8, 1,599.9) 51 (26, 62) 32 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.9)
Routt County 6 Rural 1,901.9 (1,691.5, 2,131.5) 10 (1, 37) 69 stable stable trend 8.2 (-1.9, 20.0)
Saguache County 6 Rural 1,341.8 (1,068.0, 1,665.8) 53 (17, 62) 19 stable stable trend 11.2 (-4.5, 23.2)
San Miguel County 6 Rural 1,748.6 (1,351.7, 2,225.3) 24 (1, 59) 18 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 1.4)
Sedgwick County 6 Rural 1,797.6 (1,359.1, 2,331.6) 15 (1, 60) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 3.0)
Summit County 6 Rural 1,155.5 (995.3, 1,335.3) 61 (44, 62) 48 stable stable trend 1.8 (-17.0, 20.2)
Washington County 6 Rural 1,551.3 (1,221.8, 1,941.8) 37 (2, 62) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.2)
Yuma County 6 Rural 1,477.7 (1,233.8, 1,755.7) 41 (9, 61) 26 falling falling trend -5.4 (-26.6, -0.3)
Adams County 6 Urban 1,840.3 (1,787.1, 1,894.8) 12 (6, 24) 958 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 1,766.7 (1,725.6, 1,808.5) 22 (13, 31) 1,480 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.3, -1.0)
Boulder County 6 Urban 1,781.9 (1,726.5, 1,838.5) 20 (10, 31) 822 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 1,770.0 (1,654.1, 1,891.9) 21 (5, 37) 179 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.6)
Clear Creek County 6 Urban 1,224.4 (1,002.2, 1,484.4) 59 (32, 62) 25 falling falling trend -6.6 (-19.6, -2.9)
Denver County 6 Urban 1,835.7 (1,793.1, 1,879.1) 13 (7, 25) 1,477 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Douglas County 6 Urban 1,785.9 (1,727.2, 1,846.1) 18 (9, 31) 744 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
El Paso County 6 Urban 1,732.0 (1,693.0, 1,771.6) 27 (16, 33) 1,566 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Elbert County 6 Urban 1,796.0 (1,605.8, 2,002.9) 16 (2, 42) 74 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.1)
Gilpin County 6 Urban 1,269.9 (916.4, 1,721.1) 56 (11, 62) 13 falling falling trend -5.7 (-9.7, -1.3)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 1,825.5 (1,786.0, 1,865.6) 14 (8, 25) 1,695 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Larimer County 6 Urban 1,926.0 (1,873.0, 1,980.1) 8 (2, 15) 1,049 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.4, 5.1)
Mesa County 6 Urban 1,957.4 (1,885.5, 2,031.3) 5 (1, 15) 574 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 4.5)
Park County 6 Urban 1,440.0 (1,232.7, 1,673.0) 44 (20, 61) 48 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.3)
Pueblo County 6 Urban 1,880.1 (1,811.0, 1,951.1) 11 (3, 22) 574 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Teller County 6 Urban 1,734.3 (1,559.3, 1,923.9) 26 (3, 44) 89 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.0)
Weld County 6 Urban 1,904.8 (1,841.6, 1,969.6) 9 (3, 19) 723 falling falling trend -4.7 (-9.8, -0.6)
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 8:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Hinsdale, San Juan

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top