Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 396.4 (394.1, 398.6) N/A 24,436 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 449.4 (449.1, 449.7) N/A 1,728,431 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
El Paso County 6 412.7 (405.9, 419.6) 11 (5, 19) 2,933 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Jefferson County 6 403.2 (396.4, 410.1) 17 (8, 24) 2,865 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Denver County 6 404.0 (397.1, 411.0) 15 (8, 24) 2,727 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Arapahoe County 6 391.8 (385.0, 398.8) 21 (14, 30) 2,649 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Adams County 6 404.4 (395.9, 413.0) 14 (7, 24) 1,838 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Larimer County 6 423.7 (414.3, 433.2) 8 (2, 15) 1,660 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.8, 2.6)
Boulder County 6 389.5 (380.1, 399.1) 22 (14, 32) 1,377 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Douglas County 6 393.0 (383.1, 403.0) 19 (12, 30) 1,331 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Weld County 6 411.6 (401.1, 422.3) 12 (4, 22) 1,243 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
Pueblo County 6 425.3 (412.7, 438.3) 7 (2, 16) 923 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Mesa County 6 415.4 (402.4, 428.7) 10 (3, 22) 837 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Broomfield County 6 392.8 (372.5, 414.0) 20 (5, 34) 290 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Fremont County 6 400.4 (379.1, 422.8) 18 (3, 33) 286 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Garfield County 6 407.5 (384.5, 431.4) 13 (3, 32) 257 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Montrose County 6 403.9 (380.3, 428.7) 16 (3, 33) 251 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
La Plata County 6 331.3 (311.7, 351.9) 44 (31, 52) 238 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Delta County 6 417.4 (389.9, 446.6) 9 (2, 30) 207 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Eagle County 6 319.2 (296.1, 343.6) 45 (33, 56) 172 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Teller County 6 384.0 (352.6, 417.9) 24 (4, 42) 142 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Morgan County 6 374.2 (344.6, 405.7) 26 (6, 44) 124 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Elbert County 6 371.5 (339.9, 405.4) 28 (7, 47) 123 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Chaffee County 6 382.4 (350.1, 417.4) 25 (4, 43) 121 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Montezuma County 6 308.9 (283.0, 336.6) 47 (34, 59) 120 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.0, -1.9)
Routt County 6 339.0 (307.6, 372.8) 42 (22, 54) 100 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Logan County 6 351.7 (320.4, 385.4) 36 (15, 52) 98 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.2)
Otero County 6 371.0 (336.6, 408.2) 29 (5, 48) 93 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Summit County 6 263.2 (236.7, 291.9) 61 (48, 63) 90 stable stable trend 10.6 (-1.9, 24.7)
Park County 6 297.1 (263.5, 334.3) 51 (35, 62) 79 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
Pitkin County 6 306.8 (275.4, 341.2) 49 (32, 61) 79 stable stable trend -10.7 (-23.6, 4.4)
Las Animas County 6 353.6 (316.6, 394.2) 35 (10, 53) 78 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Prowers County 6 435.1 (387.5, 487.1) 5 (1, 34) 66 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Archuleta County 6 287.3 (252.1, 326.7) 55 (36, 63) 62 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.3)
Gunnison County 6 354.2 (313.4, 399.0) 34 (7, 55) 62 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.5)
Grand County 6 301.5 (264.8, 342.1) 50 (32, 62) 60 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Alamosa County 6 362.4 (320.7, 407.9) 32 (4, 53) 59 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Moffat County 6 367.5 (323.8, 415.5) 30 (3, 53) 56 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Rio Grande County 6 344.3 (301.7, 391.6) 38 (9, 57) 53 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Clear Creek County 6 334.8 (289.9, 385.6) 43 (11, 60) 48 falling falling trend -14.7 (-22.8, -5.8)
Huerfano County 6 342.4 (294.1, 398.5) 40 (7, 59) 46 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.6)
Yuma County 6 356.8 (310.2, 408.8) 33 (4, 56) 45 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
Ouray County 6 385.5 (319.8, 463.4) 23 (1, 56) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.0)
Lincoln County 6 427.3 (361.1, 502.9) 6 (1, 44) 31 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 4.2)
Kit Carson County 6 312.9 (262.8, 370.3) 46 (18, 63) 30 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.4)
Conejos County 6 278.3 (233.7, 329.4) 57 (34, 63) 30 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.2)
Custer County 6 278.1 (226.5, 341.9) 58 (31, 63) 29 falling falling trend -11.3 (-17.3, -4.8)
Saguache County 6 273.1 (224.4, 330.3) 59 (33, 63) 28 falling falling trend -19.3 (-30.3, -6.6)
San Miguel County 6 340.3 (276.8, 413.7) 41 (3, 62) 28 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.2, -0.2)
Rio Blanco County 6 351.0 (292.2, 418.7) 37 (3, 60) 27 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Phillips County 6 442.1 (362.3, 534.8) 4 (1, 45) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Washington County 6 366.1 (302.7, 440.2) 31 (2, 58) 26 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 1.0)
Bent County 6 308.8 (254.6, 372.5) 48 (18, 63) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Lake County 6 269.8 (219.5, 328.3) 60 (34, 63) 22 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.5, 0.6)
Gilpin County 6 253.2 (200.7, 316.9) 62 (37, 63) 22 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.1, -3.2)
Baca County 6 373.5 (299.0, 463.0) 27 (1, 60) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.4)
Costilla County 6 283.8 (222.3, 360.0) 56 (20, 63) 18 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.4)
Crowley County 6 288.5 (231.5, 356.7) 53 (23, 63) 18 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -0.9)
Sedgwick County 6 342.9 (261.0, 447.0) 39 (2, 63) 14 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.0, 0.6)
Cheyenne County 6 479.3 (357.7, 631.5) 2 (1, 55) 12 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.5, 4.6)
Kiowa County 6 507.6 (370.7, 684.1) 1 (1, 54) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 3.8)
Jackson County 6 466.6 (332.5, 642.5) 3 (1, 60) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 5.0)
Dolores County 6 288.3 (203.5, 401.3) 54 (3, 63) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 3.9)
Mineral County 6 289.9 (178.5, 481.9) 52 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.4, 6.2)
Hinsdale County 6 240.1 (133.6, 427.8) 63 (3, 63) 3 stable stable trend -3.7 (-9.6, 2.5)
San Juan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 4:29 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
San Juan

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top