Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 N/A 395.2 (393.0, 397.5) N/A 25,277 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 444.4 (444.1, 444.7) N/A 1,744,459 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Hinsdale County 6 Rural 182.3 (96.5, 353.3) 63 (27, 63) 3 stable stable trend -5.2 (-13.2, 2.8)
Mineral County 6 Rural 207.4 (122.2, 368.4) 62 (14, 63) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-8.3, 5.4)
Saguache County 6 Rural 262.9 (217.0, 317.1) 61 (40, 63) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.0)
Gilpin County 6 Urban 268.9 (212.0, 337.8) 60 (30, 63) 22 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.3, -0.7)
Conejos County 6 Rural 277.4 (231.2, 330.7) 59 (35, 63) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Clear Creek County 6 Urban 286.6 (246.8, 332.2) 58 (36, 63) 44 stable stable trend 1.4 (-8.3, 8.0)
Summit County 6 Rural 287.5 (260.9, 316.1) 57 (42, 62) 103 stable stable trend 7.0 (-0.2, 17.3)
Pitkin County 6 Rural 294.5 (263.7, 328.3) 56 (39, 62) 75 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -0.9)
Grand County 6 Rural 296.3 (260.8, 335.6) 55 (35, 62) 62 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Crowley County 6 Rural 298.6 (240.5, 368.0) 54 (21, 63) 19 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.2)
Bent County 6 Rural 304.8 (251.1, 367.9) 53 (15, 62) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Yuma County 6 Rural 309.5 (266.9, 357.5) 52 (25, 62) 40 falling falling trend -5.3 (-22.7, -2.2)
Lake County 6 Rural 311.6 (257.4, 374.2) 51 (12, 62) 26 falling falling trend -2.6 (-6.8, -0.8)
Archuleta County 6 Rural 311.9 (276.3, 351.5) 50 (31, 61) 72 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Eagle County 6 Rural 314.2 (292.7, 336.9) 49 (36, 59) 185 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 2.1)
Costilla County 6 Rural 317.9 (248.6, 403.1) 48 (4, 63) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 0.8)
Custer County 6 Rural 323.3 (260.8, 399.2) 47 (5, 62) 29 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.1)
Montezuma County 6 Rural 328.6 (301.8, 357.2) 46 (30, 57) 128 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.1)
Logan County 6 Rural 331.1 (300.5, 364.1) 45 (27, 58) 92 falling falling trend -2.6 (-11.0, -0.4)
San Miguel County 6 Rural 333.3 (274.9, 400.6) 44 (5, 62) 29 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.7, 1.7)
Kit Carson County 6 Rural 333.7 (282.1, 392.7) 43 (7, 61) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 0.9)
Gunnison County 6 Rural 334.7 (295.3, 378.1) 42 (15, 59) 58 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.3, 0.0)
Alamosa County 6 Rural 337.3 (298.5, 379.7) 41 (17, 59) 59 stable stable trend -1.8 (-13.3, 0.1)
Rio Grande County 6 Rural 341.3 (299.4, 387.8) 40 (10, 59) 54 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Dolores County 6 Rural 343.2 (258.1, 451.9) 39 (2, 62) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 3.9)
Washington County 6 Rural 348.2 (285.3, 422.0) 38 (3, 61) 24 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 1.5)
Park County 6 Urban 349.1 (312.0, 390.0) 37 (10, 57) 89 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Sedgwick County 6 Rural 352.1 (273.1, 452.3) 36 (2, 62) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.0)
Morgan County 6 Rural 355.6 (327.1, 385.9) 35 (12, 52) 121 falling falling trend -7.7 (-13.5, -1.4)
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural 361.5 (301.0, 430.9) 34 (2, 60) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Las Animas County 6 Rural 362.2 (325.3, 402.7) 33 (6, 52) 84 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.9, 1.0)
Phillips County 6 Rural 371.7 (302.5, 453.0) 32 (2, 61) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
La Plata County 6 Rural 372.7 (352.3, 394.1) 31 (13, 42) 278 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.1, 7.5)
Ouray County 6 Rural 375.1 (311.7, 450.5) 30 (2, 58) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Moffat County 6 Rural 381.1 (336.8, 429.7) 29 (3, 50) 59 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Elbert County 6 Urban 381.9 (350.9, 415.2) 28 (5, 45) 131 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Baca County 6 Rural 384.2 (314.6, 467.5) 27 (1, 58) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.5)
Fremont County 6 Rural 386.8 (366.1, 408.4) 26 (7, 38) 287 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -1.2)
Montrose County 6 Rural 386.9 (364.1, 410.8) 25 (6, 39) 253 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Teller County 6 Urban 387.2 (356.3, 420.5) 24 (4, 42) 150 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.3)
El Paso County 6 Urban 389.4 (383.0, 396.0) 23 (14, 32) 2,903 falling falling trend -1.8 (-5.0, -1.2)
Boulder County 6 Urban 390.5 (381.2, 399.9) 22 (11, 33) 1,440 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Delta County 6 Rural 390.8 (364.8, 418.4) 21 (4, 39) 203 falling falling trend -7.7 (-14.1, -1.4)
Garfield County 6 Rural 391.1 (369.2, 413.9) 20 (6, 38) 260 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Huerfano County 6 Rural 391.3 (336.8, 453.9) 19 (2, 53) 50 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 391.3 (372.0, 411.4) 18 (7, 36) 318 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.1)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 393.1 (386.4, 399.9) 17 (12, 30) 2,744 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Otero County 6 Rural 396.0 (360.5, 434.4) 16 (3, 42) 101 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Routt County 6 Rural 398.5 (365.1, 434.3) 15 (3, 39) 121 stable stable trend 8.0 (-2.9, 15.4)
Douglas County 6 Urban 398.6 (389.3, 408.2) 14 (8, 28) 1,478 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 401.9 (395.2, 408.6) 13 (8, 25) 2,920 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Adams County 6 Urban 402.7 (394.3, 411.1) 12 (7, 25) 1,905 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Denver County 6 Urban 404.1 (397.2, 411.0) 11 (7, 23) 2,746 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 408.5 (344.6, 481.6) 10 (1, 50) 30 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.5)
Weld County 6 Urban 411.3 (401.1, 421.6) 9 (4, 21) 1,321 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.7, -0.5)
Chaffee County 6 Rural 413.5 (379.8, 449.9) 8 (2, 36) 132 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Mesa County 6 Urban 421.5 (408.6, 434.7) 7 (2, 16) 886 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 2.6)
Larimer County 6 Urban 424.2 (415.0, 433.5) 6 (3, 13) 1,744 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.6)
Pueblo County 6 Urban 430.6 (418.0, 443.6) 5 (1, 12) 950 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 2.6)
Prowers County 6 Rural 445.5 (396.1, 499.6) 4 (1, 33) 65 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Kiowa County 6 Rural 475.6 (344.2, 646.1) 3 (1, 59) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.3)
Cheyenne County 6 Rural 525.9 (395.7, 687.9) 2 (1, 45) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.9, 4.6)
Jackson County 6 Rural 526.8 (388.7, 705.2) 1 (1, 49) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-13.2, 13.7)
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top