Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Colorado 6 N/A 412.5 (409.2, 415.9) N/A 12,567 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 481.1 (480.6, 481.5) N/A 888,315 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.0, 0.0)
La Plata County 6 Rural 410.8 (380.1, 443.4) 20 (5, 39) 150 rising rising trend 6.6 (2.7, 12.4)
Clear Creek County 6 Urban 279.8 (227.7, 342.9) 58 (35, 61) 23 stable stable trend 4.2 (-7.5, 12.7)
Garfield County 6 Rural 448.5 (414.0, 485.0) 6 (2, 29) 145 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.2, 12.0)
Summit County 6 Rural 296.9 (260.2, 337.5) 55 (38, 61) 59 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.6, 14.4)
Dolores County 6 Rural 357.2 (248.0, 510.8) 40 (2, 61) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 6.3)
Cheyenne County 6 Rural 648.5 (452.1, 908.1) 1 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.7, 5.7)
San Miguel County 6 Rural 393.8 (306.4, 498.5) 30 (2, 59) 19 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 5.3)
Mesa County 6 Urban 436.0 (417.4, 455.3) 10 (4, 27) 441 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 6.5)
Ouray County 6 Rural 444.4 (353.1, 559.2) 8 (1, 53) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.8)
Las Animas County 6 Rural 393.0 (340.0, 452.9) 31 (3, 51) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Prowers County 6 Rural 422.6 (355.1, 499.5) 13 (2, 50) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.5)
Baca County 6 Rural 408.2 (306.9, 537.8) 22 (1, 60) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.6)
Weld County 6 Urban 433.8 (418.6, 449.4) 11 (5, 23) 669 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Phillips County 6 Rural 421.6 (319.8, 547.8) 14 (1, 58) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural 355.6 (274.0, 454.8) 42 (3, 61) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 6.9)
Pueblo County 6 Urban 476.8 (457.7, 496.6) 3 (1, 10) 498 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Chaffee County 6 Rural 443.0 (396.2, 494.8) 9 (2, 38) 73 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.6)
Bent County 6 Rural 356.7 (280.0, 450.7) 41 (3, 61) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Kit Carson County 6 Rural 365.4 (290.9, 454.6) 37 (3, 60) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.2)
Delta County 6 Rural 405.0 (368.6, 444.5) 24 (5, 42) 106 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Routt County 6 Rural 444.9 (395.8, 498.7) 7 (2, 38) 71 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.4)
Adams County 6 Urban 414.2 (401.5, 427.2) 17 (10, 31) 910 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Denver County 6 Urban 425.2 (414.7, 435.9) 12 (8, 25) 1,339 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Kiowa County 6 Rural 416.1 (260.0, 650.8) 16 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.5, 2.5)
Montrose County 6 Rural 384.8 (353.9, 418.1) 34 (10, 46) 127 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Pitkin County 6 Rural 306.7 (265.4, 353.7) 52 (34, 61) 43 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.4)
Grand County 6 Rural 286.2 (239.6, 340.1) 57 (36, 61) 34 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Otero County 6 Rural 454.6 (400.1, 514.8) 4 (1, 40) 55 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.2)
Douglas County 6 Urban 410.5 (396.3, 425.1) 21 (11, 33) 708 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -0.9)
Eagle County 6 Rural 330.2 (299.2, 363.6) 49 (32, 58) 102 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.7)
Alamosa County 6 Rural 375.3 (316.1, 442.4) 35 (4, 56) 30 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.5, 0.6)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 402.7 (392.5, 413.2) 26 (15, 35) 1,287 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.7)
Washington County 6 Rural 351.7 (268.9, 455.0) 44 (3, 61) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.5, 1.0)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 396.2 (367.4, 426.8) 29 (10, 43) 148 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.0)
Custer County 6 Rural 330.8 (245.8, 443.0) 48 (4, 61) 16 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.3)
Saguache County 6 Rural 255.1 (195.0, 332.0) 60 (36, 61) 15 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.5, 0.3)
Lake County 6 Rural 327.1 (248.9, 422.2) 50 (5, 61) 14 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 1.3)
Moffat County 6 Rural 401.8 (338.3, 474.1) 28 (2, 53) 32 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Rio Grande County 6 Rural 363.4 (304.7, 431.3) 38 (5, 58) 30 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 416.5 (406.6, 426.7) 15 (10, 29) 1,438 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.8, -1.8)
Larimer County 6 Urban 454.3 (440.6, 468.4) 5 (3, 15) 895 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.5, 1.1)
Teller County 6 Urban 406.3 (362.7, 454.5) 23 (4, 46) 83 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.4)
Conejos County 6 Rural 270.4 (209.1, 345.5) 59 (33, 61) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -1.1)
Elbert County 6 Urban 369.1 (325.4, 417.5) 36 (9, 54) 64 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.4)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 404.3 (318.6, 507.5) 25 (1, 58) 16 stable stable trend -2.6 (-15.9, 0.0)
Logan County 6 Rural 342.1 (299.0, 390.0) 45 (19, 58) 47 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.8)
Crowley County 6 Rural 290.4 (210.9, 392.1) 56 (14, 61) 10 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.2)
Gunnison County 6 Rural 336.7 (282.9, 398.1) 47 (13, 60) 32 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.2, 0.0)
Archuleta County 6 Rural 304.8 (256.8, 360.7) 53 (31, 61) 37 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.7)
Boulder County 6 Urban 413.8 (399.8, 428.1) 18 (10, 33) 718 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.1)
Costilla County 6 Rural 304.1 (215.8, 423.8) 54 (5, 61) 10 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.5, -0.2)
Montezuma County 6 Rural 354.9 (316.2, 397.5) 43 (16, 55) 69 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.9)
Morgan County 6 Rural 360.6 (320.4, 404.7) 39 (14, 54) 61 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -2.5)
Park County 6 Urban 338.3 (288.4, 395.2) 46 (17, 59) 47 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.3, -1.5)
Fremont County 6 Rural 388.1 (360.1, 417.9) 33 (12, 44) 149 falling falling trend -3.6 (-13.2, -1.2)
Huerfano County 6 Rural 413.0 (342.7, 498.2) 19 (2, 53) 29 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.6)
El Paso County 6 Urban 402.7 (392.9, 412.6) 27 (15, 35) 1,402 falling falling trend -4.4 (-10.3, -2.0)
Gilpin County 6 Urban 232.7 (159.8, 330.7) 61 (36, 61) 11 stable stable trend -4.5 (-8.9, 0.2)
Yuma County 6 Rural 310.0 (249.7, 381.3) 51 (18, 61) 19 falling falling trend -10.6 (-29.1, -4.5)
Sedgwick County 6 Rural 388.5 (279.5, 539.8) 32 (1, 61) 9 falling falling trend -21.6 (-32.6, -10.7)
Jackson County 6 Rural 579.6 (383.9, 857.4) 2 (1, 54) 7
*
*
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 12:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top