Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 N/A 388.5 (385.4, 391.6) N/A 12,710 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.3, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 421.1 (420.7, 421.5) N/A 856,144 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
El Paso County 6 Urban 387.1 (378.2, 396.2) 20 (10, 30) 1,501 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 397.0 (387.6, 406.4) 15 (6, 27) 1,483 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.1)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 394.8 (385.6, 404.2) 19 (7, 28) 1,457 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.2)
Denver County 6 Urban 395.1 (385.8, 404.7) 18 (7, 27) 1,407 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Adams County 6 Urban 402.0 (390.7, 413.6) 8 (4, 25) 996 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Larimer County 6 Urban 406.8 (394.1, 419.8) 7 (3, 23) 849 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 2.8)
Douglas County 6 Urban 397.4 (384.6, 410.5) 14 (5, 28) 769 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Boulder County 6 Urban 378.9 (366.2, 391.8) 23 (13, 34) 722 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Weld County 6 Urban 398.8 (385.0, 413.1) 12 (5, 28) 652 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.7, -1.0)
Pueblo County 6 Urban 397.7 (380.6, 415.3) 13 (4, 30) 452 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 0.7)
Mesa County 6 Urban 415.5 (397.3, 434.3) 5 (2, 23) 444 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 395.9 (369.3, 424.0) 16 (3, 34) 170 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.6)
Fremont County 6 Rural 408.5 (374.9, 444.7) 6 (2, 33) 137 stable stable trend -0.7 (-10.4, 2.6)
La Plata County 6 Rural 339.3 (311.9, 368.5) 37 (23, 52) 128 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Montrose County 6 Rural 400.9 (367.0, 437.3) 10 (2, 35) 126 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Garfield County 6 Rural 349.6 (320.7, 380.5) 33 (16, 49) 115 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Delta County 6 Rural 385.4 (347.5, 426.7) 21 (3, 43) 97 falling falling trend -8.6 (-13.9, -3.3)
Eagle County 6 Rural 299.8 (270.0, 332.2) 54 (34, 60) 83 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.5, -0.8)
Elbert County 6 Urban 401.5 (356.5, 451.1) 9 (2, 41) 67 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.6)
Teller County 6 Urban 367.8 (324.4, 416.0) 26 (4, 49) 67 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Morgan County 6 Rural 362.3 (321.1, 407.4) 28 (5, 52) 61 stable stable trend -8.9 (-18.2, 0.8)
Montezuma County 6 Rural 306.1 (269.3, 347.0) 51 (28, 60) 59 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Chaffee County 6 Rural 400.7 (349.9, 457.8) 11 (2, 43) 58 stable stable trend -5.2 (-14.2, 0.6)
Routt County 6 Rural 351.0 (306.1, 400.9) 32 (5, 55) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 2.0)
Otero County 6 Rural 349.2 (303.0, 401.0) 34 (5, 55) 46 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Summit County 6 Rural 281.7 (243.1, 325.1) 57 (34, 61) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 2.2)
Logan County 6 Rural 341.5 (294.3, 394.6) 36 (7, 58) 44 stable stable trend -2.5 (-15.6, 0.8)
Park County 6 Urban 361.9 (306.7, 425.1) 29 (3, 56) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 3.3)
Las Animas County 6 Rural 343.5 (290.3, 404.7) 35 (4, 58) 38 stable stable trend 0.6 (-6.4, 2.4)
Archuleta County 6 Rural 323.0 (270.2, 384.2) 44 (7, 60) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 1.0)
Prowers County 6 Rural 474.5 (402.2, 556.3) 3 (1, 31) 35 rising rising trend 10.4 (1.1, 23.3)
Pitkin County 6 Rural 278.7 (234.3, 329.9) 58 (32, 61) 31 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -0.7)
Alamosa County 6 Rural 314.6 (262.6, 373.9) 46 (12, 61) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.2)
Grand County 6 Rural 308.8 (255.4, 370.6) 49 (13, 61) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.6)
Moffat County 6 Rural 369.6 (306.8, 441.5) 25 (2, 56) 27 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.4)
Gunnison County 6 Rural 333.9 (276.7, 399.6) 39 (5, 60) 26 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.8)
Rio Grande County 6 Rural 324.3 (265.0, 393.5) 42 (5, 61) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Yuma County 6 Rural 310.6 (251.4, 380.4) 47 (9, 61) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.6)
Huerfano County 6 Rural 381.8 (297.6, 485.2) 22 (1, 58) 21 rising rising trend 19.0 (0.8, 31.4)
Clear Creek County 6 Urban 293.6 (234.2, 366.0) 55 (17, 61) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.7)
Kit Carson County 6 Rural 309.8 (239.0, 396.3) 48 (4, 61) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 1.9)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 443.3 (341.7, 568.0) 4 (1, 55) 14 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.8, 6.8)
Conejos County 6 Rural 285.8 (218.5, 368.3) 56 (8, 61) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 4.0)
Custer County 6 Rural 315.3 (227.4, 432.3) 45 (2, 61) 13 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 2.1)
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural 371.4 (283.2, 478.8) 24 (1, 60) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Saguache County 6 Rural 269.1 (202.7, 353.4) 59 (24, 61) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.5, 3.4)
Baca County 6 Rural 367.2 (273.8, 489.6) 27 (1, 61) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.4, 3.3)
Gilpin County 6 Urban 307.3 (222.9, 416.3) 50 (3, 61) 12 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.6, -1.4)
Lake County 6 Rural 303.7 (228.2, 396.9) 53 (4, 61) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.9)
Ouray County 6 Rural 306.0 (220.8, 418.6) 52 (3, 61) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.0, 2.4)
Phillips County 6 Rural 331.3 (239.6, 448.5) 40 (2, 61) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.3, 1.2)
Washington County 6 Rural 356.3 (260.4, 477.4) 30 (1, 61) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.8, 1.9)
San Miguel County 6 Rural 256.0 (185.3, 345.6) 61 (22, 61) 11 stable stable trend -4.5 (-8.4, 0.3)
Crowley County 6 Rural 353.0 (248.6, 493.6) 31 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 2.6)
Costilla County 6 Rural 338.0 (231.4, 480.7) 38 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.1, 3.7)
Bent County 6 Rural 260.1 (176.9, 372.0) 60 (8, 61) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 1.5)
Sedgwick County 6 Rural 323.9 (215.1, 480.1) 43 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.3, 4.1)
Kiowa County 6 Rural 538.1 (338.0, 822.2) 1 (1, 60) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.9, 7.4)
Dolores County 6 Rural 325.7 (202.1, 505.4) 41 (1, 61) 5
*
*
Cheyenne County 6 Rural 395.2 (239.0, 621.6) 17 (1, 61) 5 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.0, 8.0)
Jackson County 6 Rural 484.4 (293.2, 767.0) 2 (1, 61) 5
*
*
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 1:50 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top