Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Colon & Rectum (Late Stage^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Percent of Cases with Late Stage
 sort by percent late descending
Colorado 6 N/A 56.9 (55.3, 58.5) N/A 1,026 61.4
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 64.2 (64.0, 64.4) N/A 72,697 59.1
Montezuma County 6 Rural 34.1 (20.0, 54.2) 31 (15, 31) 4 46.3
Eagle County 6 Rural 36.0 (24.6, 51.4) 30 (19, 31) 7 67.3
La Plata County 6 Rural 39.6 (28.2, 54.2) 29 (16, 31) 9 53.8
Douglas County 6 Urban 43.2 (37.5, 49.5) 28 (21, 31) 45 54.1
Chaffee County 6 Rural 45.3 (28.4, 69.0) 27 (6, 31) 5 56.1
Broomfield County 6 Urban 46.6 (34.7, 61.2) 26 (9, 31) 11 60.2
Park County 6 Urban 49.4 (26.2, 84.5) 25 (3, 31) 4 64.3
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 51.4 (46.9, 56.2) 24 (15, 28) 100 55.2
Archuleta County 6 Rural 51.8 (28.1, 86.9) 23 (3, 31) 3 76.2
Larimer County 6 Urban 53.2 (47.3, 59.7) 22 (12, 27) 61 61.3
Logan County 6 Rural 54.9 (34.1, 83.7) 21 (3, 31) 4 53.7
El Paso County 6 Urban 55.6 (51.1, 60.4) 20 (12, 26) 117 63.4
Jefferson County 6 Urban 56.1 (51.5, 60.9) 19 (11, 25) 117 61.3
Denver County 6 Urban 56.4 (51.6, 61.6) 18 (11, 25) 105 58.0
Elbert County 6 Urban 59.7 (37.8, 89.3) 17 (2, 31) 5 56.3
Boulder County 6 Urban 60.0 (53.4, 67.2) 16 (7, 24) 63 65.3
Montrose County 6 Rural 61.6 (46.5, 80.1) 15 (3, 29) 12 54.5
Teller County 6 Urban 63.5 (42.5, 91.1) 14 (2, 30) 7 68.6
Weld County 6 Urban 64.0 (56.5, 72.2) 13 (5, 22) 56 62.7
Adams County 6 Urban 64.3 (58.1, 71.0) 12 (6, 20) 85 61.0
Mesa County 6 Urban 66.1 (57.0, 76.3) 11 (4, 22) 40 75.2
Las Animas County 6 Rural 66.5 (41.4, 101.3) 10 (2, 31) 5 71.9
Fremont County 6 Rural 67.4 (52.5, 85.2) 9 (2, 26) 15 70.9
Garfield County 6 Rural 68.1 (52.0, 87.7) 8 (2, 27) 13 68.8
Delta County 6 Rural 73.7 (53.7, 98.3) 7 (2, 26) 10 50.5
Rio Grande County 6 Rural 74.2 (41.1, 122.3) 6 (1, 31) 3 66.7
Morgan County 6 Rural 77.9 (54.5, 107.8) 5 (1, 27) 7 74.0
Otero County 6 Rural 77.9 (52.2, 111.9) 4 (1, 28) 6 73.2
Pueblo County 6 Urban 79.5 (69.9, 90.1) 3 (2, 12) 51 68.0
Prowers County 6 Rural 113.4 (71.5, 170.7) 2 (1, 22) 5 72.7
Yuma County 6 Rural 128.8 (80.8, 194.5) 1 (1, 17) 5 63.9
Alamosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Baca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Bent County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Cheyenne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Clear Creek County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Conejos County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Costilla County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Crowley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Custer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Dolores County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Gilpin County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Grand County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Gunnison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Huerfano County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Kit Carson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Moffat County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Ouray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Phillips County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Pitkin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Routt County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Saguache County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
San Miguel County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Sedgwick County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Summit County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/18/2025 6:25 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alamosa, Baca, Bent, Cheyenne, Clear Creek, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Custer, Dolores, Gilpin, Grand, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Huerfano, Jackson, Kiowa, Kit Carson, Lake, Lincoln, Mineral, Moffat, Ouray, Phillips, Pitkin, Rio Blanco, Routt, Saguache, San Juan, San Miguel, Sedgwick, Summit, Washington

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates are computed using cancers classified as malignant based on ICD-O-3. For more information see malignant.html.

^ Late Stage is defined as cases determined to be regional or distant. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top