Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 N/A 31.3 (30.7, 32.0) N/A 1,955 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.4 (36.3, 36.4) N/A 140,088 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Adams County 6 Urban 35.8 (33.3, 38.4) 9 (5, 18) 166 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 31.2 (29.4, 33.2) 16 (11, 27) 216 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 2.2)
Boulder County 6 Urban 30.2 (27.7, 32.9) 19 (11, 31) 110 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 26.6 (21.7, 32.3) 29 (12, 38) 21 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.3, -1.3)
Denver County 6 Urban 32.9 (30.9, 34.9) 15 (8, 23) 220 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Douglas County 6 Urban 28.0 (25.6, 30.6) 26 (15, 34) 103 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.1)
El Paso County 6 Urban 30.4 (28.6, 32.3) 18 (12, 29) 220 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.5)
Elbert County 6 Urban 33.5 (24.4, 45.1) 13 (3, 37) 10 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.3, 1.3)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 30.9 (29.0, 32.9) 17 (11, 29) 219 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 3.7)
Larimer County 6 Urban 28.8 (26.4, 31.3) 25 (14, 33) 114 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 2.0)
Mesa County 6 Urban 29.3 (25.9, 33.0) 23 (11, 34) 59 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.4, 1.7)
Park County 6 Urban 26.4 (16.5, 40.5) 30 (4, 41) 6 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.4, -0.9)
Pueblo County 6 Urban 40.4 (36.5, 44.6) 6 (2, 13) 86 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Teller County 6 Urban 29.1 (21.1, 39.6) 24 (5, 39) 11 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 2.3)
Weld County 6 Urban 35.4 (32.4, 38.6) 10 (5, 19) 111 stable stable trend 3.1 (-6.2, 11.6)
Alamosa County 6 Rural 25.3 (14.9, 39.8) 32 (4, 41) 4 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.6, 0.2)
Archuleta County 6 Rural 24.0 (14.4, 38.3) 34 (5, 41) 5 falling falling trend -5.6 (-11.2, -0.5)
Chaffee County 6 Rural 27.5 (19.4, 38.4) 28 (5, 40) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.5, 13.4)
Delta County 6 Rural 42.6 (34.2, 52.7) 4 (1, 23) 21 falling falling trend -35.6 (-54.7, -21.2)
Eagle County 6 Rural 22.0 (16.8, 28.4) 37 (18, 40) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 2.5)
Fremont County 6 Rural 30.0 (24.5, 36.6) 20 (6, 36) 22 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.2, -0.1)
Garfield County 6 Rural 32.9 (26.8, 40.0) 14 (4, 34) 22 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 10.5)
Grand County 6 Rural 23.1 (13.7, 36.8) 35 (5, 41) 4
*
*
Gunnison County 6 Rural 21.7 (12.8, 34.6) 38 (8, 41) 4 stable stable trend -4.4 (-10.7, 2.2)
Huerfano County 6 Rural 27.8 (15.7, 49.0) 27 (2, 41) 4 falling falling trend -6.2 (-11.4, -1.8)
Kit Carson County 6 Rural 41.1 (25.1, 64.7) 5 (1, 39) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.1, 3.7)
La Plata County 6 Rural 25.5 (20.3, 31.7) 31 (12, 39) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Las Animas County 6 Rural 29.4 (19.7, 42.8) 22 (3, 40) 7 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.6, -0.7)
Logan County 6 Rural 29.6 (21.2, 40.4) 21 (4, 39) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.0)
Moffat County 6 Rural 24.3 (14.0, 39.3) 33 (4, 41) 4 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.7, -0.6)
Montezuma County 6 Rural 22.4 (15.9, 31.0) 36 (12, 41) 9 stable stable trend -4.4 (-10.3, 1.1)
Montrose County 6 Rural 39.2 (32.1, 47.6) 7 (2, 26) 24 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Morgan County 6 Rural 38.1 (28.8, 49.3) 8 (2, 33) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.9, 2.0)
Otero County 6 Rural 34.6 (24.8, 47.4) 11 (2, 38) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.7, -1.7)
Pitkin County 6 Rural 14.9 (8.3, 25.0) 40 (25, 41) 3 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.4, 2.6)
Prowers County 6 Rural 53.5 (37.0, 75.0) 3 (1, 25) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.8, 6.4)
Rio Grande County 6 Rural 33.9 (21.5, 51.2) 12 (2, 40) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.7, -0.7)
Routt County 6 Rural 18.9 (12.3, 27.9) 39 (20, 41) 6 falling falling trend -5.9 (-11.1, -0.7)
Summit County 6 Rural 12.8 (7.4, 20.8) 41 (33, 41) 4 falling falling trend -6.4 (-11.5, -1.0)
Washington County 6 Rural 60.8 (36.3, 97.2) 1 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-9.0, 2.3)
Yuma County 6 Rural 57.9 (40.4, 80.8) 2 (1, 18) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.6, 3.1)
Baca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/06/2024 10:14 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Baca, Bent, Cheyenne, Clear Creek, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Custer, Dolores, Gilpin, Hinsdale, Jackson, Kiowa, Lake, Lincoln, Mineral, Ouray, Phillips, Rio Blanco, Saguache, San Juan, San Miguel, Sedgwick

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top