Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Breast (Late Stage^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Percent of Cases with Late Stage
 sort by percent late descending
Colorado 6 N/A 43.0 (41.9, 44.0) N/A 1,359 31.3
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 42.0 (41.9, 42.2) N/A 80,548 31.2
Adams County 6 Urban 46.1 (42.3, 50.1) 10 (3, 21) 115 35.6
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 40.2 (37.3, 43.3) 21 (11, 28) 147 29.8
Boulder County 6 Urban 46.1 (41.7, 51.0) 9 (3, 22) 83 30.0
Broomfield County 6 Urban 39.8 (31.6, 49.6) 23 (3, 32) 17 28.8
Denver County 6 Urban 42.6 (39.5, 45.8) 15 (7, 25) 148 32.0
Douglas County 6 Urban 42.9 (38.9, 47.3) 13 (5, 26) 86 28.0
El Paso County 6 Urban 47.4 (44.2, 50.7) 8 (2, 17) 179 35.3
Elbert County 6 Urban 39.4 (26.5, 56.9) 24 (1, 33) 7 32.1
Jefferson County 6 Urban 42.8 (39.7, 46.1) 14 (7, 24) 154 29.8
Larimer County 6 Urban 48.2 (43.8, 53.0) 6 (2, 19) 95 29.4
Mesa County 6 Urban 36.6 (31.2, 42.8) 27 (10, 32) 37 27.7
Park County 6 Urban 29.8 (17.0, 50.8) 32 (3, 33) 4 30.4
Pueblo County 6 Urban 34.7 (29.7, 40.5) 28 (15, 33) 37 27.6
Teller County 6 Urban 50.4 (35.4, 70.5) 3 (1, 31) 9 37.6
Weld County 6 Urban 44.1 (39.6, 49.1) 12 (4, 25) 71 33.4
Archuleta County 6 Rural 39.8 (21.7, 68.3) 22 (1, 33) 4 30.2
Chaffee County 6 Rural 45.9 (28.3, 71.0) 11 (1, 33) 5 24.5
Delta County 6 Rural 41.1 (27.8, 58.6) 18 (1, 33) 8 26.3
Eagle County 6 Rural 29.6 (21.1, 40.5) 33 (13, 33) 9 27.0
Fremont County 6 Rural 42.4 (31.1, 56.6) 16 (1, 32) 12 29.7
Garfield County 6 Rural 32.5 (24.1, 43.0) 31 (9, 33) 11 32.5
Grand County 6 Rural 40.7 (22.5, 68.3) 19 (1, 33) 3 33.3
La Plata County 6 Rural 47.7 (37.7, 59.8) 7 (1, 29) 17 32.6
Las Animas County 6 Rural 58.9 (35.7, 91.7) 2 (1, 32) 5 42.9
Logan County 6 Rural 37.3 (22.8, 58.0) 26 (1, 33) 5 40.0
Montezuma County 6 Rural 37.7 (24.8, 55.2) 25 (2, 33) 6 31.4
Montrose County 6 Rural 40.3 (29.7, 53.6) 20 (2, 33) 12 29.1
Morgan County 6 Rural 33.5 (21.5, 49.8) 29 (3, 33) 5 34.2
Otero County 6 Rural 50.0 (33.0, 73.0) 4 (1, 32) 6 42.5
Pitkin County 6 Rural 32.6 (18.3, 54.4) 30 (2, 33) 3 27.0
Prowers County 6 Rural 62.0 (36.8, 97.7) 1 (1, 32) 4 37.5
Routt County 6 Rural 49.2 (33.4, 70.2) 5 (1, 32) 7 35.8
Summit County 6 Rural 41.5 (28.3, 59.3) 17 (1, 33) 7 31.8
Alamosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Baca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Bent County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Cheyenne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Clear Creek County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Conejos County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Costilla County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Crowley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Custer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Dolores County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Gilpin County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Gunnison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Huerfano County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Kit Carson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Moffat County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Ouray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Phillips County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Rio Grande County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Saguache County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
San Miguel County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Sedgwick County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Yuma County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/07/2024 8:21 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alamosa, Baca, Bent, Cheyenne, Clear Creek, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Custer, Dolores, Gilpin, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Huerfano, Jackson, Kiowa, Kit Carson, Lake, Lincoln, Mineral, Moffat, Ouray, Phillips, Rio Blanco, Rio Grande, Saguache, San Juan, San Miguel, Sedgwick, Washington, Yuma

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates are computed using cancers classified as malignant based on ICD-O-3. For more information see malignant.html.

^ Late Stage is defined as cases determined to be regional or distant. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top