Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Ovary (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 N/A 9.5 (9.0, 10.0) N/A 310 falling falling trend -2.8 (-7.4, -1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 10.1 (10.0, 10.1) N/A 20,027 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.1)
Adams County 6 Urban 9.8 (8.1, 11.8) 6 (1, 14) 25 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.1, 0.1)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 10.4 (9.0, 12.0) 2 (1, 12) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Boulder County 6 Urban 8.5 (6.7, 10.6) 14 (3, 15) 16 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.5, -2.8)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 10.0 (6.1, 15.5) 5 (1, 15) 4
*
*
Denver County 6 Urban 10.3 (8.8, 12.0) 3 (1, 12) 36 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
Douglas County 6 Urban 9.0 (7.1, 11.1) 12 (2, 15) 18 stable stable trend -3.1 (-5.9, 0.1)
El Paso County 6 Urban 9.3 (8.0, 10.8) 9 (2, 14) 36 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.5)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 9.6 (8.1, 11.2) 8 (2, 14) 35 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.4)
Larimer County 6 Urban 9.7 (7.8, 11.9) 7 (1, 14) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.4)
Mesa County 6 Urban 11.5 (8.7, 14.9) 1 (1, 13) 13 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.2)
Pueblo County 6 Urban 8.2 (5.9, 11.1) 15 (2, 15) 9 stable stable trend -5.9 (-31.6, 3.3)
Weld County 6 Urban 8.5 (6.6, 10.8) 13 (2, 15) 14 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.5, -0.1)
Fremont County 6 Rural 9.2 (5.3, 15.8) 10 (1, 15) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-9.4, 4.1)
Garfield County 6 Rural 10.1 (5.9, 16.4) 4 (1, 15) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.2, 3.6)
Montrose County 6 Rural 9.0 (5.1, 15.5) 11 (1, 15) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.8, 7.7)
Alamosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archuleta County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chaffee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eagle County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elbert County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gunnison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huerfano County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Plata County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Las Animas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moffat County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montezuma County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otero County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Park County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pitkin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prowers County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Grande County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Routt County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summit County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Teller County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/10/2024 8:31 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alamosa, Archuleta, Baca, Bent, Chaffee, Cheyenne, Clear Creek, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Custer, Delta, Dolores, Eagle, Elbert, Gilpin, Grand, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Huerfano, Jackson, Kiowa, Kit Carson, La Plata, Lake, Las Animas, Lincoln, Logan, Mineral, Moffat, Montezuma, Morgan, Otero, Ouray, Park, Phillips, Pitkin, Prowers, Rio Blanco, Rio Grande, Routt, Saguache, San Juan, San Miguel, Sedgwick, Summit, Teller, Washington, Yuma

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top