Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County
Prostate (All Stages^), 2015-2019
All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages
Sorted by CI*Rank
Explanation of Column HeadersObjective - The objective of *** is from the Healthy People 2020 project done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.
Other Notes
- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
Colorado6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 93.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 91.6 to 94.7 and 2,928 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 3.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 6.9.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- Rate : The incidence rate is 109.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 109.7 to 110.2 and 211,245 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 4.6.
Garfield County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 131.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 113.6 to 151.5 and 44 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 1 (1, 14)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 8.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.6 to 22.1.
Larimer County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 129.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 122.4 to 136.9 and 265 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 2 (1, 9)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 6.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 4.9 to 8.8.
Washington County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 123.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 78.2 to 190.6 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 3 (1, 48)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.0 to 3.9.
Rio Grande County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 122.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 89.6 to 165.0 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 4 (1, 40)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.4 to 3.5.
Eagle County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 118.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 99.7 to 139.6 and 35 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 5 (1, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -3.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.2 to -0.8.
Pitkin County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 116.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.2 to 145.9 and 18 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 6 (1, 34)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.7 to 0.3.
Chaffee County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 115.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 94.2 to 141.1 and 22 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 7 (1, 30)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -3.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.4 to -0.4.
Prowers County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 109.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 78.7 to 149.4 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 8 (1, 46)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.3 to 2.2.
Baca County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 108.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 60.7 to 185.7 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 9 (1, 52)
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Phillips County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 107.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 63.1 to 176.8 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 10 (1, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.8 to 1.6.
Rio Blanco County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 107.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 67.4 to 164.8 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 11 (1, 51)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -5.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -9.6 to -1.4.
El Paso County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 104.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 99.1 to 109.1 and 362 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 12 (6, 21)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -6.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.2 to -5.0.
Pueblo County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 103.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.2 to 112.8 and 115 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 13 (6, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 6.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.4 to 20.6.
Routt County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 101.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 80.6 to 127.1 and 19 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 14 (1, 43)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -5.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.1 to -2.5.
Weld County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 100.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 93.5 to 108.7 and 152 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 15 (7, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 7.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 17.7.
Summit County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 100.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 80.1 to 124.6 and 20 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 16 (2, 44)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 18.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 43.1.
La Plata County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 97.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 83.4 to 113.2 and 39 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 17 (5, 38)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 12.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.7 to 32.4.
Gunnison County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 95.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 69.5 to 128.6 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 18 (1, 49)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 2.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.7 to 12.8.
Moffat County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 94.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 66.0 to 132.5 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 19 (1, 50)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -5.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.9 to -2.8.
Boulder County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 93.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 87.3 to 100.6 and 169 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 20 (12, 31)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 5.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.5 to 19.3.
Broomfield County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 92.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.1 to 108.5 and 34 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 21 (6, 42)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 7.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 1.4 to 12.8.
Otero County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 92.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 69.8 to 121.6 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 22 (2, 49)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.9 to 1.3.
Jefferson County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 91.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 86.9 to 96.1 and 337 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 23 (15, 33)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.8 to 10.6.
San Miguel County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 91.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 52.5 to 148.4 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 24 (1, 52)
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Huerfano County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 90.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 61.6 to 135.6 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 25 (1, 51)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -4.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.0 to -0.8.
Denver County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 90.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 85.3 to 95.0 and 289 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 26 (15, 34)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 2.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 7.4.
Lincoln County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 87.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 50.6 to 142.9 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 27 (1, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 51.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 8.0 to 113.0.
Ouray County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 86.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 55.2 to 143.0 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 28 (1, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.4 to 1.9.
Teller County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 86.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 69.0 to 108.1 and 21 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 29 (7, 48)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -5.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.8 to -3.6.
Mesa County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 85.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 77.8 to 94.2 and 90 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 30 (16, 41)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -6.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.1 to -5.1.
Morgan County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 83.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 64.8 to 106.2 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 31 (7, 50)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -6.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.9 to -4.3.
Custer County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 82.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 46.4 to 146.7 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 32 (1, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -4.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.5 to 0.1.
Logan County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 82.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 62.8 to 106.5 and 12 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 33 (7, 50)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -5.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.3 to -3.2.
Delta County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 80.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.8 to 97.6 and 23 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 34 (12, 48)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -5.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.2 to -2.9.
Grand County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 79.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 56.0 to 111.0 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 35 (5, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -4.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.8 to -1.0.
Douglas County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 79.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 73.5 to 86.1 and 141 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 36 (23, 44)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -5.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.4 to -3.5.
Arapahoe County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 78.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 74.1 to 83.1 and 262 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 37 (26, 43)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.3 to 8.1.
Montrose County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 77.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 64.4 to 93.1 and 26 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 38 (16, 49)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -5.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.6 to -4.1.
Adams County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 75.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 70.5 to 81.5 and 168 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 39 (28, 46)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 4.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.7 to 16.0.
Fremont County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 74.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 62.3 to 87.9 and 29 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 40 (20, 49)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -5.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.9 to -3.1.
Las Animas County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 72.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 51.9 to 99.3 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 41 (11, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.2 to 0.8.
Kit Carson County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 72.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 43.8 to 114.1 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 42 (5, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -6.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -9.3 to -2.7.
Elbert County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 70.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 53.5 to 91.2 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 43 (16, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 13.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.6 to 38.7.
Alamosa County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 68.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 45.3 to 98.5 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 44 (10, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -6.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -10.3 to -1.9.
Conejos County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 67.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 41.6 to 106.4 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 45 (7, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -4.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.3 to -1.8.
Montezuma County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 66.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 51.8 to 86.0 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 46 (20, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -7.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -11.1 to -3.5.
Lake County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 66.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 36.9 to 112.2 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 47 (4, 52)
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Park County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 62.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 46.2 to 85.8 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 48 (21, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -6.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -9.8 to -3.3.
Saguache County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 62.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 35.7 to 106.9 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 49 (7, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -5.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -9.5 to -1.0.
Clear Creek County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 57.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 37.2 to 89.8 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 50 (19, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -18.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -27.6 to -7.4.
Yuma County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 50.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 29.5 to 83.1 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 51 (24, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -7.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -11.2 to -2.9.
Archuleta County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 46.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 31.2 to 68.6 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 52 (40, 52)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -7.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -10.9 to -3.9.
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2023 7:37 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bent, Cheyenne, Costilla, Crowley, Dolores, Gilpin, Hinsdale, Jackson, Kiowa, Mineral, San Juan, Sedgwick
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.