Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 N/A 100.0 (98.4, 101.6) N/A 3,281 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Fremont County 6 Rural 64.8 (53.9, 77.7) 50 (33, 50) 26 falling falling trend -8.3 (-21.8, -5.9)
Alamosa County 6 Rural 65.0 (42.5, 95.3) 49 (14, 50) 6 falling falling trend -6.7 (-12.0, -2.1)
Clear Creek County 6 Urban 69.8 (46.5, 104.5) 48 (10, 50) 6 falling falling trend -13.4 (-41.6, -7.1)
Bent County 6 Rural 70.8 (40.1, 120.0) 47 (5, 50) 3
*
*
Elbert County 6 Urban 72.3 (55.7, 93.1) 46 (17, 50) 15 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.7, -2.8)
San Miguel County 6 Rural 74.0 (46.4, 116.4) 45 (5, 50) 5
*
*
Morgan County 6 Rural 74.8 (57.6, 95.8) 44 (16, 50) 13 falling falling trend -6.8 (-30.6, -4.0)
Lake County 6 Rural 74.9 (43.4, 122.3) 43 (3, 50) 4
*
*
Park County 6 Urban 75.6 (57.9, 99.6) 42 (13, 50) 14 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.1, -2.0)
Delta County 6 Rural 75.8 (62.3, 92.2) 41 (19, 50) 23 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.0, -3.0)
Conejos County 6 Rural 77.5 (48.1, 120.9) 40 (4, 50) 4 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.6, -0.6)
Las Animas County 6 Rural 77.6 (57.0, 104.9) 39 (9, 50) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.3)
Moffat County 6 Rural 77.9 (54.3, 109.6) 38 (6, 50) 8 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.1, -2.3)
Custer County 6 Rural 79.5 (43.3, 145.4) 37 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -4.1 (-8.6, 0.1)
Archuleta County 6 Rural 80.1 (60.7, 106.9) 36 (9, 50) 12 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.1, -2.5)
Montrose County 6 Rural 80.6 (67.5, 95.9) 35 (17, 48) 29 stable stable trend 3.4 (-3.4, 15.6)
Logan County 6 Rural 82.9 (62.7, 108.0) 34 (7, 50) 12 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.9, -2.6)
Mesa County 6 Urban 84.4 (76.7, 92.7) 33 (20, 43) 94 stable stable trend 7.5 (-6.7, 17.2)
Adams County 6 Urban 85.8 (80.2, 91.7) 32 (21, 40) 197 stable stable trend 3.5 (-3.3, 13.4)
Ouray County 6 Rural 86.1 (54.5, 143.0) 31 (2, 50) 5 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.2, 2.6)
Montezuma County 6 Rural 87.2 (70.0, 108.2) 30 (8, 49) 19 stable stable trend 7.0 (-2.8, 29.7)
Saguache County 6 Rural 87.4 (55.5, 136.8) 29 (2, 50) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.6, 2.1)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 87.7 (51.4, 142.1) 28 (1, 50) 4 falling falling trend -6.3 (-12.7, -1.6)
Grand County 6 Rural 87.8 (63.4, 119.5) 27 (4, 50) 11 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.2, 0.6)
El Paso County 6 Urban 88.0 (83.7, 92.6) 26 (20, 38) 328 falling falling trend -6.2 (-8.1, -5.1)
Teller County 6 Urban 88.9 (71.4, 110.6) 25 (7, 48) 22 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.2, -3.5)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 89.2 (84.6, 94.0) 24 (19, 37) 309 stable stable trend 0.8 (-5.6, 10.0)
Washington County 6 Rural 90.8 (52.4, 150.7) 23 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Kit Carson County 6 Rural 92.4 (59.9, 139.3) 22 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend 20.0 (-1.1, 48.4)
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural 95.2 (58.0, 149.7) 21 (1, 50) 4 falling falling trend -5.7 (-10.1, -1.9)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 96.3 (82.9, 111.3) 20 (7, 40) 39 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.6, -2.6)
Douglas County 6 Urban 98.1 (91.6, 105.0) 19 (11, 30) 186 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.8, -2.9)
Prowers County 6 Rural 98.1 (68.5, 137.1) 18 (2, 50) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.4, 2.1)
Huerfano County 6 Rural 101.7 (71.5, 147.5) 17 (1, 49) 8 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.4, -1.1)
Otero County 6 Rural 102.2 (78.3, 131.8) 16 (2, 46) 13 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.0, 1.3)
Denver County 6 Urban 102.3 (97.3, 107.5) 15 (10, 25) 336 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.8)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 104.4 (99.7, 109.3) 14 (9, 24) 395 stable stable trend -6.3 (-14.5, 1.5)
Gunnison County 6 Rural 104.6 (78.1, 138.1) 13 (2, 47) 12 stable stable trend 7.6 (-1.3, 25.1)
Boulder County 6 Urban 105.4 (98.6, 112.5) 12 (7, 25) 196 rising rising trend 5.6 (0.7, 12.2)
Pitkin County 6 Rural 105.7 (83.3, 133.9) 11 (2, 42) 16 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.8)
Weld County 6 Urban 109.5 (102.1, 117.3) 10 (5, 23) 176 stable stable trend 4.7 (-9.3, 19.6)
Rio Grande County 6 Rural 111.1 (80.6, 150.8) 9 (1, 45) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.7, 4.6)
Pueblo County 6 Urban 111.5 (102.7, 120.9) 8 (5, 22) 125 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 8.9)
Eagle County 6 Rural 113.2 (96.3, 132.3) 7 (2, 29) 38 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.6, 0.3)
Garfield County 6 Rural 121.8 (105.2, 140.4) 6 (1, 22) 44 stable stable trend 5.7 (-1.0, 20.2)
La Plata County 6 Rural 125.0 (109.1, 142.8) 5 (1, 19) 50 rising rising trend 10.4 (4.4, 21.4)
Summit County 6 Rural 125.2 (104.3, 149.7) 4 (1, 25) 28 rising rising trend 16.3 (1.6, 45.4)
Larimer County 6 Urban 137.2 (130.1, 144.7) 3 (1, 7) 297 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.3)
Chaffee County 6 Rural 145.2 (121.1, 174.0) 2 (1, 11) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.6)
Routt County 6 Rural 158.9 (132.9, 189.1) 1 (1, 8) 30 rising rising trend 18.8 (0.6, 38.5)
Baca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 4:59 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Baca, Cheyenne, Costilla, Crowley, Dolores, Gilpin, Hinsdale, Jackson, Kiowa, Mineral, Phillips, San Juan, Sedgwick, Yuma

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top