Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 *** 14.2 (13.8, 14.7) N/A 858 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 17.1 (17.0, 17.1) N/A 64,622 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Adams County 6 *** 17.0 (15.3, 18.8) 5 (2, 12) 78 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Arapahoe County 6 *** 14.7 (13.4, 16.1) 12 (6, 18) 99 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.9)
Boulder County 6 *** 12.2 (10.5, 14.0) 19 (10, 23) 42 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Broomfield County 6 *** 15.6 (11.7, 20.4) 9 (1, 22) 11 rising rising trend 7.3 (3.3, 11.5)
Delta County 6 *** 13.1 (8.3, 19.7) 17 (1, 26) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.6, 2.1)
Denver County 6 *** 15.7 (14.3, 17.1) 8 (3, 15) 103 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Douglas County 6 *** 11.9 (10.2, 13.8) 20 (12, 23) 40 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Eagle County 6 *** 7.9 (4.5, 12.7) 26 (13, 26) 4 falling falling trend -11.7 (-21.8, -0.3)
El Paso County 6 *** 14.4 (13.2, 15.8) 13 (6, 18) 99 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Elbert County 6 *** 9.7 (5.6, 16.4) 22 (6, 26) 4
*
*
Fremont County 6 *** 15.7 (11.6, 21.0) 7 (1, 22) 11 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 6.7)
Garfield County 6 *** 8.4 (5.4, 12.4) 25 (16, 26) 6
*
*
Jefferson County 6 *** 14.3 (13.1, 15.7) 14 (6, 18) 100 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
La Plata County 6 *** 8.7 (5.8, 12.7) 24 (14, 26) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.8, 6.1)
Larimer County 6 *** 13.2 (11.6, 15.0) 16 (8, 21) 49 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Las Animas County 6 *** 20.3 (12.6, 31.8) 2 (1, 22) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-4.1, 8.2)
Logan County 6 *** 15.9 (9.5, 25.0) 6 (1, 26) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-8.3, 3.5)
Mesa County 6 *** 13.8 (11.4, 16.5) 15 (4, 22) 26 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5)
Montezuma County 6 *** 15.3 (9.8, 22.9) 10 (1, 25) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.6, 4.9)
Montrose County 6 *** 14.9 (10.1, 21.3) 11 (1, 24) 7 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.8, 9.6)
Morgan County 6 *** 21.5 (14.7, 30.4) 1 (1, 19) 7 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.4, 9.6)
Pueblo County 6 *** 17.6 (15.0, 20.5) 4 (1, 14) 36 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.1, -1.7)
Routt County 6 *** 12.4 (7.0, 20.4) 18 (1, 26) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.8, 5.6)
Summit County 6 *** 8.9 (4.7, 15.7) 23 (5, 26) 3
*
*
Teller County 6 *** 10.1 (5.8, 16.9) 21 (5, 26) 4 stable stable trend -4.1 (-8.4, 0.5)
Weld County 6 *** 18.3 (16.1, 20.7) 3 (1, 11) 53 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.7, 5.8)
Alamosa County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archuleta County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baca County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chaffee County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gunnison County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huerfano County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moffat County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otero County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Park County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pitkin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prowers County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Grande County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2022 1:27 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alamosa, Archuleta, Baca, Bent, Chaffee, Cheyenne, Clear Creek, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Custer, Dolores, Gilpin, Grand, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Huerfano, Jackson, Kiowa, Kit Carson, Lake, Lincoln, Mineral, Moffat, Otero, Ouray, Park, Phillips, Pitkin, Prowers, Rio Blanco, Rio Grande, Saguache, San Juan, San Miguel, Sedgwick, Washington, Yuma

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top