Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 N/A 16.5 (16.1, 17.0) N/A 1,034 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 71,542 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Logan County 6 Rural 10.8 (6.1, 18.1) 29 (6, 29) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.9, 3.3)
Montezuma County 6 Rural 11.1 (7.0, 17.2) 28 (9, 29) 5 stable stable trend -3.5 (-9.2, 2.0)
Delta County 6 Rural 12.3 (8.1, 18.3) 27 (5, 29) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 3.0)
Summit County 6 Rural 12.9 (7.3, 20.9) 26 (2, 29) 4
*
*
Fremont County 6 Rural 14.4 (10.7, 19.2) 25 (4, 29) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.9, 1.1)
La Plata County 6 Rural 14.5 (10.5, 19.6) 24 (3, 29) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 4.1)
Eagle County 6 Rural 14.6 (9.9, 20.8) 23 (2, 29) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.6, 6.3)
Montrose County 6 Rural 14.8 (10.8, 19.9) 22 (3, 29) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.4, 2.8)
Garfield County 6 Rural 15.1 (10.9, 20.3) 21 (3, 29) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.7)
El Paso County 6 Urban 15.5 (14.3, 16.9) 20 (10, 25) 116 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.5)
Adams County 6 Urban 15.7 (14.1, 17.5) 19 (8, 25) 71 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Mesa County 6 Urban 16.2 (13.8, 18.9) 18 (4, 26) 35 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Teller County 6 Urban 16.4 (10.3, 25.1) 17 (1, 29) 6 stable stable trend -4.4 (-28.6, 2.8)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 16.4 (15.1, 17.8) 16 (7, 24) 117 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.7, -2.0)
Pueblo County 6 Urban 16.6 (14.2, 19.3) 15 (4, 25) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Morgan County 6 Rural 16.6 (10.9, 24.5) 14 (1, 29) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.4, 4.0)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 16.8 (15.4, 18.3) 13 (5, 23) 114 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.4)
Denver County 6 Urban 16.8 (15.4, 18.3) 12 (5, 23) 110 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Pitkin County 6 Rural 17.0 (10.2, 27.3) 11 (1, 29) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.0, 4.3)
Boulder County 6 Urban 17.5 (15.5, 19.6) 10 (3, 23) 62 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Douglas County 6 Urban 17.6 (15.7, 19.7) 9 (3, 22) 64 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Routt County 6 Rural 18.2 (11.3, 27.7) 8 (1, 29) 5
*
*
Elbert County 6 Urban 18.6 (12.1, 27.6) 7 (1, 29) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.1, 5.8)
Larimer County 6 Urban 19.3 (17.4, 21.4) 6 (1, 15) 79 stable stable trend -9.7 (-21.4, 1.2)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 19.4 (15.2, 24.3) 5 (1, 24) 15 stable stable trend 10.3 (-1.1, 28.5)
Weld County 6 Urban 19.4 (17.2, 21.8) 4 (1, 16) 60 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.3)
Otero County 6 Rural 20.2 (12.3, 31.4) 3 (1, 29) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.7, 6.5)
Chaffee County 6 Rural 22.1 (14.1, 33.4) 2 (1, 27) 6 falling falling trend -34.7 (-57.5, -17.7)
Park County 6 Urban 24.6 (15.3, 38.0) 1 (1, 27) 6 stable stable trend -50.1 (-77.7, 6.4)
Alamosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archuleta County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gunnison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huerfano County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Las Animas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moffat County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prowers County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Grande County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 1:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top